118 High-temperature superconductors
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40
1
2
43X
© Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2011
behavior is discussed in detail in section 3.4.1. The topic discussed in section
3.4.2 covers the general optical signatures when moving from the pseudogap state
towards the overdoped regime. Section 3.4.3 makes a special discussion on the
normal state gap in electron-doped materials.
3.4.1 The pseudogap in the optical response
Besides being a spin gap, the pseudogap also represents an equally strong gap in
the charge excitation channel. However, the pseudogap is only a partial gap at the
Fermi level. By partial gap, one has to understand that there are directions on the
Brillouin zone where the Fermi surface survives and other directions that show no
states at the Fermi energy. ARPES showed that below T* the antinodal directions
are gapped and the nodal directions are metallic. This observation led to the term
‘nodal metal’ to describe the pseudogap state. The first question to address then is
what happens to the optical conductivity.
If states are lost at the Fermi level, the low frequency optical conductivity
should decrease. In section 3.3.4 we discussed what happens for a density wave
and for a superconducting gap. In both cases, finite low frequency spectral weight
is lost. The difference between the two situations is the final destination of this
spectral weight (either high frequencies or the
δ
(
ω
) function). But, again, low
frequency spectral weight is lost in the two situations. Therefore, it is natural to
look for such an effect in the pseudogap state.
Panel (a) of Fig. 3.8 shows the real part of the optical conductivity for four
different dopings in YBCO ranging from slightly overdoped to heavily underdoped
(Lee et al., 2005). This data is measured with the electric field of light lying on the
CuO
2
planes. The room temperature spectra is shown as dashed lines for all
samples. It shows the Drude-like peak observed in the strongly correlated cuprates.
The zero frequency limit of these data decreases when going towards the
underdoped side, as expected by the higher dc resistivity in this region. The shape
of all curves are nevertheless similar. The solid line in these figures show the
optical conductivity in the normal state just above T
c
. One common characteristic
is that for all samples the zero frequency limit of
σ
1
increases. This increase
follows very well the decrease in the resistivity. The striking difference between
the near optimal doped (x = 7.00) sample and all the underdoped samples is the
dip around 500 cm
–1
. On first sight, we would say that this is the normal low
frequency loss of spectral weight due to the pseudogap. This is not the case! As
we discuss below, this conclusion was reached for Bi2212 (Santander-Syro et al.,
2002) but the same result is valid for all hole-doped cuprates.
The first hint that we are not facing a spectral weight loss is that we cannot see
a gain of spectral weight at higher energies as expected for a density wave gap
(Fig. 3.5). Transfer to a zero frequency
δ
function is most certainly not reasonable
as the system is not entering the superconducting state. Panels (b) and (c) of Fig.
3.8 shed some light on what is happening. They show the RSW for an underdoped