Substrate Oxidation by Cytochrome P450 Enzymes
197
the nitrogen, and thus is more consistent with a HAT
than a SET mechanism.
4-Phenyl-rra«5'-l-(2-phenylcyclopropyl)-l,2,
3,6-tetrahydropyridine (20) is oxidized by rat hver
microsomes to cinnamaldehyde and A/-dealky-
lated tetrahydropyridine in addition to conven-
tional metabolites (Figure 6.13). The first two
metabolites have been postulated to be formed via
the nitrogen radical cation, cyclopropyl ring open-
ing, electron abstraction, proton elimination to
form the double bond, and hydrolysis of the
iminium link to release the aldehyde^^^
The oxidation potential for an amide nitrogen
is higher than that of an amine due to the electron-
withdrawing effect of the carbonyl group. The
P450-catalyzed 7V-dealkylation of amides with a
deuterated and undeuterated A^-methyl substituent,
RCON(CH3)(CD3), are subject to intramolecular
isotope effects of 4-7^^^' ^^^. The corresponding
isotope effect for the iV-dealkylation catalyzed
by a model porphyrin was 5.6^^^, a much higher
value than that observed for the electrochemical
reaction that proceeds via a nitrogen radical cation
intermediate^^^. These results suggest that amide
A^-dealkylation occurs by direct carbon hydroxyla-
tion as a result of the higher oxidation potential of
the amide nitrogen.
P450-catalyzed oxygen transfer to amines to
give the N-oxidQ or 7V-hydroxyl product is gener-
ally considered to involve nitrogen radical cation
formation followed by recombination with the
ferryl oxygen (Figure 6.11)^^^' ^^^. As these reac-
tions are less amenable to direct investigation with
mechanistic probes, the postulate of a radical
cation mechanism rests largely on the evidence for
such intermediates in A^-dealkylation reactions.
However, the reported absence of a systematic
relationship between the electronic properties of
substituents and the rates of oxidation of anilines
and dimethylanilines to hydroxylamines and
A^-oxides, respectively, provides no support for
such a mechanism^^^' ^^^. One as yet unproven
explanation for the absence of
a
correlation is that
the stability of the 7V-oxide-iron complex makes
dissociation of the
A^-oxide
partially rate limiting^ ^^.
Hlavica has also proposed that iV-oxide formation
is mediated by the P450-ferric hydroperoxide
rather than ferryl species based, in part, on the
observation that the oxidation of A^,A/-dimethylani-
line to the corresponding A^-oxide mediated by
CYP2B4 is both inhibited by superoxide dismutase
and supported by
H202^^^.
However, these criteria
do not differentiate between the ferric hydroper-
oxide and ferryl species, as one is the precursor of
the other. In the absence of more direct evidence,
it is not possible to determine whether A^-oxide
and hydroxylamine formation proceeds by a
mechanism other than reaction with the ferryl
species to give a transient nitrogen radical cation
intermediate.
The conversion of thioethers to sulfoxides or
iS-dealkylated products, as noted for the oxidation
of amines, could involve the formation of a tran-
sient sulfur radical cation or direct oxygen trans-
fer to either the sulfur or the adjacent carbon. If
any function can be oxidized by direct reaction
with the P450 ferric hydroperoxide species, it
would appear to be a thioether sulfur. The ratio
of *^-dealkylation to sulfoxidation products was
reported in early work to correlate well with the
acidity of the protons adjacent to the sulfur^^^.
Furthermore, electron-donating groups modestly
accelerate the rate of formation of sulfoxides from
substituted thioanisoles (Hammett p^ = —0.16),
and of the sulfoxides to the corresponding
sulfones (Hammett p+ = -0.2)^2^' ^^^ in an
intramolecular competition experiment, it has
been found that the thioether of thianthrene-5-
oxide is oxidized in preference to the symmetry-
related thioether sulfoxide function, confirming
the expected higher reactivity of the sulfide than
sulfoxide ^^^. Unfortunately, although these results
indicate that sulfoxidation occurs most readily at
electron-rich sulfur atoms, the magnitudes of the
effects are such that they cannot be used to unam-
biguously differentiate between radical cation and
oxygen transfer mechanisms for sulfur oxidation.
Bacciochi et al. have shown that a radical
cation localized on the trimethoxy-substituted
phenyl ring is generated when a thioether, with a 2-
(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)ethyl on one side and a
phenyl group on the other, is chemically oxidized.
They have then shown that liver microsomes
exclusively oxidize a thioether with a 3,4,5-
trimethoxyphenyl group on one of the sulfur-
bearing carbons to a sulfoxide rather than to the
products expected from formation of the trimetho-
xyphenyl radical cation^^"^. In view of the finding
that chemical oxidation yields the trimetho-
xyphenyl radical cation, they conclude that the sul-
foxide is formed by direct oxygen transfer from the
P450 to the sulfur because oxygen rebound to the