Vaccines "&%
(iv) The crowding-out effect: Vaccines may be inactivated when multiple vaccines are
administered.
(v) Choice of test animal: The test animal in evaluating a vaccine is of paramount impor-
tance. The vaccine must be able to induce antibody production in the animal being used.
(vi) The route of administration: This may be important in determining the efficiency of
the response.
27.6 VACCINE PRODUCTION VERSUS OTHER ASPECTS
OF INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY
It is important that some differences between vaccine production and routine industrial
fermentations be discussed in order to emphasize its uniqueness.
(i) The cells used in vaccine manufacture are usually pathogenic and therefore complete
sterility must be maintained. Furthermore, while contaminants may merely hinder
production in other industrial fermentations, in vaccine production, contaminants
may mean the introduction of an undesirable organism into the human body.
(ii) The fermentation is usually small (25-1,000 liters) compared to, say, antibiotic
fermentation (500,000 liters). This is because the amount required per person is
usually small.
(iii) Potency cannot be determined during cultivation, hence reproducibility during
production is viewer the less very essential.
SUGGESTED READINGS
Anon, 1979. Microbial Processes: Promising Technologies for the Developing countries. National
Academy of Science, Washington, DC, USA.
Dove, A. 2004. Making Prevention Pay Nature Biotechnology, 72, 387-391.
Fraser, C.M., Rappuoli, R. 2005. Application of Microbial Genomic Science To Advanced
Therapeutics. Annual Review of Medicine, 56, 459-474.
Gurunathan, S., Klinman, D.M., Seder, R.A. 2000. DNA VACCINES: Immunology, Application,
and Optimization. Annual Review of Immunolology, 18, 927–974.
Kuby, J. 1997. Immunology 3
rd
Ed W H Freeman and Co. New York, USA.
Meinginer, B., Mongeot, H., Favre, H. 1980. Development in Biological Standardization, 46, 249-
256.
Mora, M, Veggi, D., Santini, L., Pizza, M., Rappuoli, R. 2003. Reverse Vaccinology Drug Discovery
Today 8, 459-464.
Rappuoli, R. 2001. Reverse Vaccinology, a Genome-based Approach to Vaccine Development.
Vaccine, 19, 2688-91.
Robertson, B.H., Nicholson, J.K.A. 2005. New microbiology Tools For Public Health And Their
Implications. Annual Review of Public Health. 26, 281–302.
Spier, R.E. 1980. Adv. Biochem. Eng. 14, 141-162.
Stoughton, R.B. 2005. Applications of DNAmicroarrays in Biology. Annual Reviews of
Biochemistry 74, 53–82.
Telford, J.L., Pizza, M., Grandi, G., Rappuoli, R. 2002. Reverse Vaccinology: From Genome to
Vaccine In: Methods in Microbiology. Vol 33, Academic Press. Amsterdam the Netherlands:
pp. 258–269.
Yewdell, J.W., Haeryfar, S.M.M. 2005. Understanding Presentation of Viral Antigens To Cd8+ T
Cells In Vivo: The Key to Rational Vaccine Design. Annual Review of Immunology 23, 651–82.
Zinkernagel, R.M. 2003. On Natural And Artificial Vaccinations. Annual Review of
Immunolology, 21, 515–46.