CHAPTER 5. GUIDELINES FOR GENERAL IMAGING
190
Some studies have shown decreased accuracy in predicting future cardiac
events in patients who have undergone thrombolytic therapy for acute
myocardial infarction.
(c) Assessment of myocardial viability
One of the more important factors in deciding whether to refer a patient
with left ventricular dysfunction due to coronary artery disease for revasculari
-
zation (whether coronary bypass or angioplasty) is the presence or absence of
viable myocardium. The term ‘viable myocardium’, in its broadest sense,
denotes any myocardium that is not infarcted. This includes normal, stunned or
hibernating myocardium. For the cardiologist, however, the search for
myocardial viability is primarily a quest for myocardial hibernation.
Myocardial hibernation is classically defined as chronic hypoperfusion and
dysfunction that reverses after revascularization. It can be distinguished from
myocardial stunning, which denotes acute but transient hypoperfusion and
dysfunction, typically after a myocardial infarction in adjacent tissue that does
not require intervention because it recovers spontaneously. It is now accepted,
however, that the line separating hibernation from stunning is not as clear as
was once thought.
Various modifications to basic myocardial perfusion imaging protocols
have been devised in order to distinguish hibernating, viable myocardium from
non-viable, infarcted myocardium. These include late redistribution, re-
injection imaging (both protocols using
201
Tl) and nitrate augmented rest
imaging (using either
201
Tl or
99m
Tc labelled agents).
The current best non-invasive method of detecting myocardial viability is
the comparison of perfusion and metabolism using PET tracers, although this still
underestimates the presence of viable myocardium in roughly 10% of patients.
(d) Assessment of ventricular function
Combining myocardial perfusion imaging with the ECG gating technique
(synchronization of acquisition to the ECG signal) allows the investigation of
ventricular wall motion and thickening throughout a typical cardiac cycle. This
may then be evaluated qualitatively by viewing the images in an endless loop
cine-display, or quantitatively using commercially available software. By
drawing ROIs around the endocardial boundaries of the ventricle, either
manually or through automatic edge detection algorithms, a volume curve can
also be generated for the entire cardiac cycle, from which quantitative
parameters such as end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes as well as ejection
fraction can be derived.