10
1. GEOMETRICAL OPTICS
to be in a medium with index n
1
, the image point P
2
in the medium with index
n
2
. We assume that n
2
>n
1
, and that the convex spherical surface has the radius
of curvature r>0.
For our derivation we assume that all angles are small; that is, we use the
approximation of the paraxial theory. To find out what is small, one may look at
a table of y
1
sin θ and compare it with y
1
θ. The angle should be in radians
and then one may find angles for which y
1
and y
2
are equal to a desired accuracy.
We consider a cone of light emergingfrom point P
1
.The outermost ray,making
an angle α
1
with the axis of the system, is refracted at the spherical surface, and
makes an angle α
2
with the axis at the image point P
2
(Figure 1.4). The refraction
on the spherical surface takes place with the normal being an extension of the
radius of curvature r, which has its center at C. We call the distance from P
1
to
the spherical surface the object distance x
o
, and the distance from the spherical
surface to the image point P
2
, the image distance x
i
. In short, we may also use
x
o
for “object point” and x
i
for “image point.”
The incident ray with angle α
1
has the angle θ
1
at the normal, and pene-
trating in medium 2, we have the angle of refraction θ
2
. Using the small angle
approximation, we have for the law of refraction
θ
2
n
1
θ
1
/n
2
. (1.27)
From Figure 1.4 we have the relations:
α
1
+ β θ
1
and α
2
+ θ
2
β. (1.28)
For the ratio of the angles of refraction we obtain
θ
1
/θ
2
n
2
/n
1
(α
1
+ β)/(β − α
2
). (1.29)
We rewrite the second part of the equation as
n
1
α
1
+ n
2
α
2
(n
2
− n
1
)β. (1.30)
The distance l in Figure 1.4 may be represented in three different ways.
tan α
1
l/x
o
, tan α
2
l/x
i
, and tan β l/r. (1.31)
Using small angle approximation, we substitute Eq. (1.31) into Eq. (1.30) and get
n
1
l/x
o
+ n
2
l/x
i
(n
2
− n
1
)l/r. (1.32)
FIGURE 1.4 Coordinates for the derivation of the paraxial imaging equation.