
is set by the elevation of the waterfall, and the design procedures should
be the same as for manmade sources where the head is established by the
characteristics of the site.
Natural sources may have aesthetic value, which should be considered.
‘-'For example,
if all the water flow from a waterfall or a stream is to be
used for power production,
the waterfall or a portion of the stream will be
.
.dried up.
If only a portion of the flow is used, aesthetic and other
environmental effects are minimized.
Natural sources are subject to annual stream variation. For Category 2
developers, power generating potential will vary with the flow.
2.6.2 Manmade Sources
Existing manmade sources can generally be modified to install a micro-
hydropower system without much of an environmental impact. The construction
of a dam for the sole purpose of developing microhydropower systems is gen-
erally economically prohibitive.
However, if a dam is being built for other
purposes, a microhydropower system may be a logical and economica:l addition
'\
ta the project. Small dams typically have a relatively small change in
elevation (head), 35 feet or less. With a small head, the-flow has .to be
larger to produce a given amount of power, and larger flow means bigger
turbines--and thus more expense than for installations operating with a
larger head to produce the same amount of power. Figure 2-12 shows a possi-
ble installation at an old mill site.
Figure 2-13 shows a siphon penstock
that could be used on an existing dam at which there is no way to draw the
water out of the reservoir.
.I
.’
In certain parts of the country,
manmade structures suctvas canal drops
provide excellent opportunities for hydropower production. Flow can be
t
seasonal, but it is generally constant during the months of operation.
For
canals where the flow is seasonal,
care should be taken to ensure that
enough energy can be produced annually to justify the expense.
Figure 2-14
shows such an installation,
.
.
2-20