MWD and LWD
1009
The volume of hydrocarbons in place at reservoir conditions is
Q,
=
7758
9
Q,
ShC
h
where
Q,
=
volume
of
hydrocarbons in bbl/acre
CP
=
porosity in fraction
h
=
formation thickness in ft
ShC
=
hydrocarbon saturation in fraction
(4-2 12)
Apparent Water
Reslstlvlty
R,.
Some MWD/LWD log sets display a curve
labeled
R,. Rwa
is computed using Equation
4-210
assuming that
S,
=
1
(100%).
Consequently
we
have
R
t
R,
=
R,
=
-
F
Since
(4-213)
(4-214)
where F
=
formation factor
a
=
constant depending on the formation, generally
1
or
0.81
or
0.62
m
=
cementation factor, generally
2
or
2.15
Finally,
Rt
cpm
R,
=
-
a
(4-2 15)
The true porosity
@
is determined with the neutron-density Pe logs.
Rt
is
generally given by the deep investigation resistivity curve.
Rwa
equals
R,
in the
water formations. It increases rapidly in hydrocarbon saturated formations.
Permeablllty.
Permeable zones can be identified with the resistivity measure-
ments made with different radius of investigation.
A
departure between the
curves of deep and shallow investigation is a qualitative indication of permeability.
The charts mentioned in the section titled “Measuring While Tripping: Wiper
Logs” can be used to estimate quantitatively the permeability if several measure-
ments during tripping are made with resistivity devices that can give the inva-
sion diameter.
Surface measurements on the mud can be used to estimate the mudcake
characteristics. If the formation pressure is known, the differential pressure can
be calculated, and a chart similar to Figures
4-293a
and b can be plotted.
The invasion diameters at various times should follow one of the permeability
curves. Note that the permeability effect is seen only for formations with
1
md
or less permeability. Above
1
md, the invasion diameter is dependent mostly
on porosity.
Log
Samples.
Figure
4-300
shows samples
of
gamma ray and spectral gamma
ray logs. The boundaries of the clean (not shaly) zone can be seen very clearly: