68
Chapter
2
I
I
I
I
I
Figure
23
Tube rows multiples arrangement; (a) four rows-two pass; (b)
six
rows-two pass.
Values of F for four rows, two passes, and six rows, two passes are shown in Figs.
24
and
2
5,
re spec ti vel
y
.
6.4.
Thermal Relations for Various TEMA Shells and Others
The thermal effectiveness relations for various
TEMA
shells and others are presented next,
using the following simplifying assumptions given at the beginning of this section and the
additional assumption of perfect transverse mixing of the shell fluid. Since the shell-side flow
arrangement is unique with each shell type, the exchanger effectiveness is different for each
shell even though the number of tube passes may be the same. The P-NTU, or LMTD method
is commonly used for the thermal analysis of shell and tube exchangers. Therefore, thermal
relation formulas and effectiveness charts are presented as for the P-NTU, method.
E
Shell
The basic case of the
E
shell, one shell pass and one tube pass with parallel flow and counter-
flow arrangement, is shown in Fig. 26. For the counterflow case with more than five baffles,
the
F
value can be taken as
1.
Thermal effectiveness charts shown in Fig. 6 can be used for
parallel flow arrangement and Fig. 7 for counterflow arrangement.
Multipassing
on
the
Tube
Side.
On the tube side, any number of odd or even passes is
possible. Increasing the even number of tube passes from two to four, six, etc., decreases the
exchanger effectiveness slightly, and in the limit when the number of tube passes approaches
infinity with one shell pass, the exchanger effectiveness approaches that for a single-pass cross-
flow exchanger with both fluids mixed. The odd number of tube passes per shell has slightly
better effectiveness when the shell fluid flows countercurrent to the tube fluid for more than
half the tube passes. However, this is an uncommon design and may result in structural and
thermal problems in manufacturing and design. Common tube-side multipass arrangements for
TEMA El.?,
El-3,
and
El..,
shells are shown in Fig. 27.
Even Number
of
Tube Passes. One shell pass and two tube passes as shown in Fig. 4 using
a U-tube bundle is one of the most common flow arrangements used in the single-pass TEMA
E
shell. The heat exchanger with this arrangement is also simply referred to as a conventional
1-2 heat exchanger. If the shell fluid is idealized as well mixed, its temperature is constant at
any cross section. In this case, reversing the tube fluid flow direction will not change the
idealized temperature distribution and the exchanger thermal effectiveness. Possible flow pat-
terns of the
E,.:
shell were already shown in Fig.
4.
This is referred as “stream symmetric.”
The 1-2 and
1-4
cases were solved long ago by Bowman
[
111, Underwood
[
121, and
Nagle
[30].
The 1-N geometry for even number of passes was solved by Back
[31].
Thermal
effectiveness formula for the El.: case is given by
Eq.
T13 in Table 6 and the thermal effective-
ness chart is given in Fig.
28
along with the
Fmln
curve. Thermal effectiveness formulas for
4
and N tube-side passes are given by
Eqs.
T14 and
T15,
respectively, in Table 6. The thermal