
Here
(12.23)
Expressing v
L
, through we obtain the flux flow conductivity
With the microscopic values of and taken for dirty superconductors, we
find
(12.24)
As already mentioned, the first term in eqn (12.23) is due to the dissipation
caused by relaxation of the order parameter after passage of a vortex, while the
second one comes from the normal-current dissipation in the vortex core. In the
TDGL model with u ~ 1, both mechanisms give comparable contributions to
f
.
The numerical calculations using the vortex order parameter obtained by solving
the GL equation give for the first term (see the review by Gor’kov and Kopnin
(1975) and references therein)
which is independent of u. The second term, however, does depend on u. For
example, for u = 5.79 we have
To calculate a
2
we need first to solve eqn (12.20). In this case, the total
coefficient is a
0.502. The flux flow conductivity becomes
end p.239
(12.25)
It is close to t ho expression
f
=
n
H
c2
/B known as the Bardeen–Stephen model
(Bardeen and Stephen 1965). This simple prediction implies that the flux flow
resistivity is just a normal-state resistivity times the fraction of space occupied by
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com)
© Copyright Oxford University Press, 2003-2010. All Rights Reserved
Oxford Scholarship Online: Theory of Nonequilibrium Supe... http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/private/content/phy...
第5页 共6页 2010-8-8 16:01