casting for machining. The casting was repeat-
edly re-checked, re-orienting it slightly with
shims to test whether wall thicknesses were
adequate, and whether all the surfaces required
to be machined would in fact clean up on
machining. After the 2 hours, it was common to
see it, our most expensive casting, dumped on
the scrap heap; no orientation could be found to
ensure that it was dimensionally satisfactory
and could be completely cleaned up on
machining. All this changed on the day when the
new foundry came on stream. A formal system
of location points to define the position of the
casting was introduced. After this date, no
casting was subjected to dimensional checking.
All castings were received from the foundry and
on entering the machine shop were immediately
thrown on to a machine tool, pushed up against
their location points, clamped, and machined.
No tedious measurement time was subsequently
lost, and no casting was ever again scrapped for
machining pick-up problems.
It is essential that every casting has defined
locations that will be agreed with the machinist
and all other parties who require to pick up the
casting accurately.
For instance, it is common for an accurate
casting to be picked up by the machinist using
what appear to be useful features, but which
may be formed by a difficult-to-place core, or a
part of the casting that requires some dressing
by hand. Thus although the whole casting has
excellent accuracy, this particular local feature is
somewhat variable in location. The result is a
casting that is picked up inaccurately, and does
not therefore clean up on machining. As a result
it is, perhaps rather unjustly, declared to be
dimensionally inaccurate.
The author suffered precisely this fate after
the production of a complex pump body casting
for an aerospace application that achieved
excellent accuracy in all respects, except for a
small region of the body that was the site where
three cores met. The small amount of flash at
this junction required dressing with a hand
grinder, and so, naturally, was locally ground to
a flat, but at various slightly different depths
beneath the curved surface of the pump body.
This hand-ground location was the very site that
that machinist chose to locate the casting. The
result was disaster. Furthermore, it was not
easily solved because of the loss of face to the
machinist who then claimed that the location
options suggested by the foundry were incon-
veniently awkward. The fault was not his of
course. The fundamental error lay in not
obtaining agreement between all parties before
the part was made. If the location point used by
the machinist really was the only sensible option
for him, the casting engineer and toolmaker
needed to ensure that the design of the core
package would allow this.
Ultimately, this Rule is designed to ensure
that all castings are picked up accurately, and
conveniently if possible, so that unnecessary
scrap is avoided.
Different arrangements of location points are
required for different geometries of casting. Some
of the most important systems are listed below.
10.2.1 Rectilinear systems
1. Six points are required to define the position
of a component with orthogonal datum
planes that is designed for essentially recti-
linear machining, as for an automotive
cylinder head or block. (Any fewer points
than six are insufficient to define the position
of the casting, and any more than six will
ensure that one or more points are potentially
in conflict.)
On questioning a student on how to use a six-
point system to locate a brick-shaped casting,
the reply was `Oh easy! Use four points around
the outside faces and one top and one bottom.'
This shows how easy it is to get such concepts
wildly wrong!
In fact, the six points are used in a 3, 2, 1
arrangement as shown in Figure 10.2. The sys-
tem works as follows: three points define plane A,
two define the orthogonal plane B, and one
defines the remaining mutually orthogonal
plane C (Figure 10.2). The casting is then picked
up on a jig or machine tool that locates against
these six points. Example (a) shows the basic use
of the system: points 1, 2 and 3 locate plane A;
points 4 and 5 define plane B; and point 6
defines plane C. Planes A, B and C may be the
datum planes. Alternatively, it is often just as
convenient for them to be parallel to the datum
planes, but at accurately specified distances away.
Clearly, to maximize accuracy, points 1, 2 and
3 need to define a widely based triangle, and
points 4 and 5 similarly need to be as widely
spaced as possible. A close grouping of the
locations will result in poor reproducibility of the
pickup of the casting; tiny errors in the position
or surface roughness of the tooling points would
be magnified if they were not widely spaced.
Example (b) shows an improved arrangement
whereby the use of a tooling lug on the long-
itudinal centreline of the casting allows the
dimensions along the length of the casting to be
halved. The largest dimension of the casting is
usually subject to the largest variability, so
halving its effect is a useful action.
Rule 10. Provide location points 177