123
Impoundment Volume (cu. m): 1,230,000
Incident Information:
Date: 1969 Incident Type: 2A Cause: SE
Quantity of Tailings Released (cu. m):
Tailings Travel Distance (m):
Incident Description:
The tailings dam was constructed as a
conventional water-retention type structure with
an internal core, clayey gravel shells, and a
blanket drain. Operation of the dam was such
that ponded water accumulated directly against
the upstream face of the dam. Excessive seepage
through the dam occurred during the first few
years of operation. The reservoir was lowered, an
asphalt emulsion was placed on the upstream
face, and seepage was substantially reduced.
During operation of subsequently constructed
downstream dam raises, tailings were spigotted
from the embankment crest as a primary
seepage-control measure.
Source: Smith, et. al., 1977
Incident No.: 146
Dam/Mine Name: Unidentified
Mine Location: United Kingdom
Ore/Tailings Type: sandstone
Dam Height (m): 30
Dam Type: DS Dam Fill Material: E
Impoundment Volume (cu. m):
Incident Information:
Date: 1967 Incident Type: 2A Cause: SE
Quantity of Tailings Released (cu. m):
Tailings Travel Distance (m):
Incident Description:
Shortly after filling of the first stage of the dam,
small slips on the downstream slope, high
piezometer pressures, and a break in the decant
pipe passing through the dam occurred. These
conditions were repaired by placing a filter and
buttress on the downstream slope. Following
subsequent downstream raising of the dam,
seepage occurred at the interface between the new
and original fill on the downstream dam slope
during impoundment of runoff. This was repaired
by placing a synthetic membrane on the exposed
upstream face of the dam.
Source: Little and Beavan, 1976
Incident No.: 52
Dam/Mine Name: Granisle
Mine Location: British Columbia, Canada
Ore/Tailings Type: copper
Dam Height (m): 24
Dam Type: DS Dam Fill Material: MW
Impoundment Volume (cu. m):
Incident Information:
Date: Incident Type: 2A Cause: SE
Quantity of Tailings Released (cu. m):
Tailings Travel Distance (m):
Incident Description:
The initial stage of the tailings dam was
constructed across a bay of a large lake by
dumping mine waste, and tailings were
discharged into the bay from the dam crest. A
sudden piping failure occurred when the tailings
beach reached a level one foot above the lake
tailwater elevation, carrying a significant quantity
of tailings and effluent through the mine waste
and into the lake. The condition was repaired by
placing a wide zone of cycloned sand over the
spigotted tailings beach, thereby pushing ponded
water back from the dam. The combined effects
of drainage by cycloned sands and reduction of
internal seepage gradients prevented further
piping, and subsequent dam raises incorporated
an upstream filter zone against the placed mine
waste.
Source: Klohn, 1979; Klohn, 1980
Incident No.: 157
Dam/Mine Name: Unidentified
Mine Location: British Columbia, Canada
Ore/Tailings Type:
Dam Height (m):
Dam Type: DS Dam Fill Material: CST
Impoundment Volume (cu. m):
Incident Information:
Date: Incident Type: 2A Cause: SE
Quantity of Tailings Released (cu. m):
Tailings Travel Distance (m):
Incident Description:
Piping developed at the abutment of a cycloned
sand tailings dam when ponded water rose in
response to spring runoff and came into direct
contact with the sand tailings embankment fill.
This condition had been predicted, and an
upstream impervious zone had been added to
prevent its occurrence. However, careless
spigotting of tailings had eroded this zone at the
abutment contact. Repairs consisted of dumping
impervious fill on the upstream dam face and
filling the downstream eroded piping exit area
with sand and gravel filter material.
Source: Klohn, 1979
Incident No.: 158
Dam/Mine Name: Unidentified
Mine Location: British Columbia, Canada
Ore/Tailings Type:
Dam Height (m): 30
Dam Type: DS Dam Fill Material: MW
Impoundment Volume (cu. m):
Incident Information:
Date: Incident Type: 2A Cause: SE
Quantity of Tailings Released (cu. m):
Tailings Travel Distance (m):