100
Impoundment Volume (cu. m): 300,000
Incident Information:
Date: 07-19-1985 Incident Type: 1A Cause: SI
Quantity of Tailings Released (cu. m): 190,000
Tailings Travel Distance (m): 4,000
Incident Description:
Two upstream-type impoundments had been
constructed with the upper embankment founded
partially on the slimes deposit of the lower.
Embankment slopes ranged from 1.2:1 to 1.5:1.
Failure of the upper embankment caused the
lower embankment to also fail, with the loss of
269 lives in the resulting tailings flowslide.
Mechanisms that triggered the failure may have
included excess pore pressures in soft foundation
tailings due to embankment raising, seepage of
ponded water into embankment sands,
pressurization of a blocked decant conduit, or
excess pore pressures in natural foundation soils
in response to rainfall or embankment seepage.
For more details, see Section 6.
Source: Berti, et al, 1988; Chandler RJ and
Tosatti G (1995) The Stava tailings dam failure,
Italy, July 1985. Geotechnical Engineering, Pub
Instn Civil Engrs, London, vol. 113, no 2, pp 67-
79.
Incident No.: 211
Dam/Mine Name: Balka Chuficheva
Mine Location: Lebedinsky (Kursk Magnetic
Anomaly), Russia
Ore/Tailings Type: iron/chalk, sand
Dam Height (m): 25
Dam Type: US
Dam Fill Material: Hydraulic fill sand
Impoundment Volume (cu. m): 27,000,000
Incident Information:
Date: 1-20-1981 at 06:30
Incident Type: lA Cause: SI
Quantity of Tailings Released (cu. m): 3,500,000
Tailings Travel Distance (m): 1,300
Incident Description:
The dam retained hydraulically placed chalky and
sandy overburden from mine stripping. A breach,
which occurred at right end of dam where it
joined the valley side, became 55m wide.
Resulting ravine formed in the impoundment up
to 20m deep, max. width 400m and 1km long.
Primary cause: violation of technology in
performing hydrodumping works caused pond to
be moved down to the dam.
Source: ICOLD Tailings Committee.
Incident No.: 94
Dam/Mine Name: No.3 Tailings Dam,
Phelps-Dodge
Mine Location: Tyrone, NM, USA
Ore/Tailings Type: copper
Dam Height (m): 66
Dam Type: US Dam Fill Material: CST
Impoundment Volume (cu. m): 2,500,000
Incident Information:
Date: 10-13-1980, night
Incident Type: 1A Cause: SI
Quantity of Tailings Released (cu. m): 2,000,000
Tailings Travel Distance (m): 8,000
Incident Description:
The embankment was being raised continuously
by constructing perimeter dikes of cycloned sand
tailings and discharge of slimes cyclone overflow
to the impoundment. During the night,
flowsliding occurred through a breached section
215m wide and 35m deep. Tailings flowed down
slope and up opposite side, then 8km down the
valley. The failure is attributed to a rapid raising
rate and insufficient dissipation of pore pressures
in the embankment. Alternative explanations
advanced include breach due to pipeline rupture
as a triggering mechanism for the flowslide.
Source: New Mexico State Engineers Office;
Phelps Dodge, Phoenix.
Incident No.: 96
Dam/Mine Name: Pit No. 2
Mine Location: Western Australia, Australia
Ore/Tailings Type: rare earth
Dam Height (m): 9
Dam Type: US Dam Fill Material: T
Impoundment Volume (cu. m):
Incident Information:
Date: 1977 Incident Type: 1A Cause: SI
Quantity of Tailings Released (cu. m):
Tailings Travel Distance (m):
Incident Description:
Tailings produced by mining of ocean beach
sands for ilmenite, rutile, and zircon were
deposited in a mined-out pit. The pit bottom
sloped upward at a 3-4 degree angle, and
deposition of tailings by direct spigotting
proceeded from the lowest end of the pit and
progressed upward in increments behind low
tailings dikes. This procedure resulted in
deposition of slimes beneath the dikes. An initial
localized dike failure in 1976 was attributed to a
high phreatic surface in the dike resulting from
rainfall and high pond operating levels. A larger
failure one year later showed evidence of
upthrusting at the toe of the pit, block-type
downslope movement of tailings and sand boils
within the failed mass. This larger failure had no
obvious trigger mechanism, and it was concluded
that excess pore pressures in permeable layers