means "either X
or
Y"
where X and Y
don't
automatically rule each
other
out.
Thus,
ager
idoneus
vel
malis
vel
piris
(a field suitable for
either apple trees
or
pear trees), the implication being
that
the field
could be used for either or both.
Ager idoneus aut
malis
aut
piris
(a field suitable either for apple trees
or
else for pear trees) implies
that
if
you plant one kind
of
tree, you've had it as far as the other is
concerned. In the language
of
logic,
it's
the distinction between
"inclusive" and "exclusive 'or's.' "
For
"both
...
and
...
" the basic possibilities are these in Latin.
You can use
et
or
et
...
et .
..
, as in nauta
et
agricola
sunt
in
agro
(both the sailor and the farmer are in the field) and et
in
Galliii
et
in
Britannia
nauta
nauta
et
matella matella
(in
both
Gaul and Britain,
a sailor is a sailor and a chamber pot
is
a chamber pot).
Et
is the all·
purpose joiner. Somewhat more specialized
"ands"
are
-que
and
atque (sometimes known as plain
ac).
The frrst
of
these, ·que, is an
enclitic, that is, something
of
a linguistic parasite. The specialized
task
that
-que
performs is
to
join parts
to
form a whole. Thus, while
et can join practically anything together,
-que
usually joins things
which already have something
to
do with each other, things which
complement each other.
Thus,fi1iae
fi1iique
(daughters and sons),
unus
alterque
(both
the one and the other). A tque essentially serves
to emphasize the word which follows
it,
as in Catullus's elegy
on
the
death
of
his brother,
"Frater,
Ave atque
Vale"
("Brother, Hail and
Farewell").
Having considered
I,
2, and
"and,"
and having promised
to
have
a look
at
the number
3,
can we
put
it
off
any longer? In fact, we
can.
For
we
can slip the third declension in frrst,
not
only
on
the
admittedly
flimsy
grounds that
it
has the number 3 in the title,
but
more convincingly because
"three"
just so happens
to
be a third
declension
nomen in Latin. Besides,
you
have
to
learn about the
third declension sooner
or
later, and this declension has all the good
words in it anyway.
Most Latin books make a big deal
out
of
the third declension.
The fact
is,
if
you
don't
mind having
to
learn two stems per nomen,
41