and the corresponding brake fuel conversion efficiency. It should
be
stressed that
there are many different engine configurations and uses, and that for each of
these there are variations in design and operating characteristics. However, these
representative values of performance parameters illustrate the following trends:
1.
Within a given category of engines (e.g., naturally aspirated four-stroke SI
engines) the values of maximum bmep, and bmep and
S,
at maximum rated
power, are closely comparable. Within an engine category where the range in
size is substantial, there is an increase in maximum bmep and a decrease in
minimum bsfc as size increases due to the decreasing relative importance of
friction and heat loss per cycle. There is also
a
decrease in
Sp
at maximum
power as engine size increases. Note the higher bmep of naturally aspirated SI
engines compared to equivalent
NA
diesels "due to the fuel-rich operation of
the former at wide-open throttle.
2.
Two-stroke cycle spark-ignition engines have sigmficantly lower bmep and
higher bsfc than four-stroke cycle SI engines.
\
3.
The effect
of
increasing inlet air density by increasing inlet air pressure
increases maximum bmep values substantially. Turbocharging with after-
cooling gives increased bmep gains relative to turbocharging without after-
cooling at the same pressure level. The maximum bmep of turbocharged SI
engines is knock-limited. The maximum bmep of turbocharged
compression-
ignition engines is stress-limited. The larger CI engines are designed to accept
higher maximum cylinder pressures, and hence higher boost.
4.
The best efficiency values of modern automobile SI engines and ID1 diesel
engines are comparable. However, the diesel has
a significant advantage at
lower loads due to its low pumping work and leaner air/fuel ratio. Small DI
diesels have comparable (or slightly lower) maximum bmep to equivalent
ID1
diesels. The best bsfc values for DI diesels are
10
to
15
percent better, however.
5.
In the DI diesel category (which is used over the largest size rangeless than
100
mm bore to almost
1
m), maximum bmep and best brake fuel conversion
efficiency steadily improve with increasing engine size due to reduced impact
of friction and heat loss per cycle, higher allowable maximum cylinder pres-
sure so higher boost can
be
used, and (additionally in the larger engines)
through turbocompounding.
PROBLEMS
15.1. The schematics show three different four-stroke cycle spark-ignition engine com-
bustion chambers. A and B are two-valve engines,
C
is
a four-valve engine (two
inlet valves which open simultaneously, two exhaust valves). Dimensions in milli-
meters are indicated. A and
C
have normal inlet ports and do not generate any
swirl,
B
has a helical inlet port and generates substantial swirl. Spark plug locations
are indicated. All three engines operate at the same speed (3000 revjmin), with the
same
inlet mixture composition, temperature, and pressure, and have the same dis-
placed volume.
ENGINE
OPERATING
CHARACTERISTICS
889
(a)
Rank the chambers 1,2, 3 in the order of their volumetric efficiency (1
=
highest
7l3
(b) Rank the chambers in order (1,
2,
3)
of their flame frontal area
(1
=
highest)
when the mass fraction burned is about 0.2 and the piston is
at
TC.
(c) Given this relative flame front area ranking, discuss whether the ranking by
mass burning rate
dmddt
will be different from the flame area ranking.
(d)
Briefly discuss the knock implications of these three chamber designs. Which is
likely to have the worst knock problem?
$
spark
plug
&-loo----j
t/
~loo-----cj
+1oomm+
A.
2-valve
B.
Zvalve
C.
4-valve
Side
plug
Plug
16
am
fmm
axis
Center
plug
Nonnal
port
Helical
port
No-
ports
FIGURE
PI54
15.2 Figures 15-23 and 15-10 show the variation in brake specific fuel consumption
(bsfc) for a swirl-chamber ID1 automobile diesel (D) and a conventional automobile
spark-ignition (SI) engine
as
a function of load and speed, respectively. From these
graphs determine, and then plot, brake fuel conversion efficiency: (1)
as
a function
of speed at
full
load
and (2) as a function of load at a mid-speed of 2500 revjmin.
Both engines are naturally aspirated. Assume the engine details are:
Compression
Equivalence
Displacement,
ratio
ratio
range
dm3
Diesel
22
0.34.8
2.3
SI
engine
9
1.0-1.2 1.6
(a)
List the major engine design and operating variables that determine brake fuel
conversion efficiency.
(b) Explain briefly the reasons for the shapes of the curves you have plotted and the
relative relationship of the
D
and SI curves.
(c)
At
2500 revjmin, estimate which engine will give the higher maximum brake
power.
153. The diesel system shown in the figure consists of a multicylinder reciprocating
diesel engine, a turbocharger (with a compressor
C
and turbine
T,
mechanicaily
connected to each other), an intercooler
(I),
and a power turbine
(T,)
which is
geared to the engine drive shaft. The gas and fuel flow paths and the gas states at
the numbered points are shown. You can assume that the specific heat at constant
pressure
c,
of the gas throughout the entire system is 1.2 kJ/kg.
K
and
y
=
cdc,
=
1.333. The engine operates at
1900
revjmin. The fuel has a lower heating value of
42
MJ/kg
of fuel,