556 12. Iodination Reagents
enzymatic approach utilizes lactoperoxidase in the presence of H
2
O
2
to oxidize
125
I
to I
2
. The
iodine thus formed may react with tyrosine or histidine sites within proteins, forming radiola-
beled complexes. Unlike the use of chemical oxidants for iodination, the enzymatic reaction is
very pH dependent—the optimum being between pH 6 and 7. If H
2
O
2
is directly added to the
reaction medium, it must be highly pure with no stabilizing agents such as metals, since they
inhibit the oxidation process.
An alternative to direct addition of H
2
O
2
is to form it in situ through the use of a second enzy-
matic reaction. Enzymobeads (originally from Bio-Rad, but no longer commercially available)
used immobilized lactoperoxidase along with immobilized glucose oxidase to create the neces-
sary oxidative environment. The glucose oxidase reaction transformed added glucose in the iodin-
ation medium to the required H
2
O
2
. As it was formed, the lactoperoxidase (coupled in tandem
to the same beads) would catalyze the formation of I
2
( Figure 12.6 ). The immobilized enzymes
create an iodination environment that is more oxidatively gentle than direct addition of a soluble
chemical oxidant like chloramine-T.
5. Iodinatable Modifi cation and Crosslinking Agents
Radioiodination can be done by an indirect approach that utilizes a radiolabeled crosslin–
king or modifi cation reagent which is then used to label the target molecule. One advantage of
indirect labeling over direct modifi cation of tyrosine or histidine residues in proteins is to be
able to control the iodination to occur with functional groups other than just using indigenous
amino acids. In addition, the ability to add a radiolabeled modifi cation agent to a molecule can
facilitate the radioactive tagging of substances that normally do not have radioiodinatable sites.
Another major advantage of using iodinatable modifi cation agents is to eliminate the potential
for oxidative damage to sensitive biological molecules, as may occur when an oxidant is used
in direct iodination procedures.
For instance, an amine-reactive modifi cation reagent can be radiolabeled and subsequently
used to couple with - and N-terminal amines on a protein molecule. The protein is not
exposed to oxidative conditions, and the level of radiolabeling can be discretely controlled by
the molar ratio of modifi cation reagent addition. The use of iodinatable crosslinking reagents
can similarly provide radioactive tags incorporated into conjugates at the time of formation.
In addition, iodinatable bioconjugation reagents that react with groups such as sulfhydryls, alde-
hydes, or other functionalities of limited occurrence in proteins or other macromolecules, can
be used to direct the point of radiolabeling to areas away from active centers or binding sites,
thus better preserving biological activity. Finally, some photoreactive crosslinking agents can be
iodinated, used to label a targeting molecule, photolyzed at the point of binding to its target,
and the cross-bridge of the resulting complex chemically cleaved, resulting in the transfer the
radiolabel to the targeted component (Chapter 5, Section 3). This process can be used to fol-
low the targeted molecule in vivo or in cellular systems.
Direct iodination of proteins and other molecules does not provide the range of experi-
mental options available through indirect labeling. The main disadvantage of the indirect
labeling process is the additional steps needed to prepare the radiolabeled crosslinker or modi-
fi cation reagent before iodination of the desired molecule. The following sections discuss some
of the major indirect iodination methods, including the reagents available for doing such
procedures.