Alternatively, spacer arms can be introduced into a macromolecule to extend a reactive
group away from its surface. The extra length of a spacer can provide less steric hindrance to
conjugation and often yields more active complexes.
The use of modifi cation reagents to create specifi c functionalities is an important technique
to master. In one sense, the process is like using building blocks to construct on a target mol-
ecule any desired functional groups necessary for reactivity. The success of many conjuga-
tion schemes depends on the presence of the correct chemical groups. Care should be taken in
choosing a modifi cation strategy, however, since some chemical changes will radically affect
the native structure and activity of a macromolecule. A protein may lose its capacity to bind
a specifi c ligand. An enzyme may lose the ability to act upon its substrate. A DNA probe may
no longer be able to hybridize to its complementary target. In many cases, the potential for
inactivation relates to changing conformational structures, blocking active sites, or modifying
critical functional groups. Trial and error and careful literature searches are often necessary to
optimize any modifi cation tactic.
4.1. Introduction of Sulfhydryl Residues (Thiolation)
The sulfhydryl group is a popular target in many modifi cation strategies. Crosslinking agents
that have more than one reactive group often employ a sulfhydryl-reactive functionality at one
end to direct the conjugation reaction to a particular part of a target macromolecule. The fre-
quency of sulfhydryl occurrence in proteins or other molecules is usually low (or nonexistent)
compared to other groups like amines or carboxylates. The use of sulfhydryl-reactive chemistries
thus can restrict modifi cation to only a limited number of sites within a target molecule. Limiting
modifi cation greatly increases the chances of retaining activity after conjugation, especially in
sensitive proteins like some enzymes. Unfortunately, sulfhydryl groups often need to be gener-
ated (from reduction of indigenous disulfi des) or created (from use of the appropriate thiolation
reagent systems). The following sections describe the most popular techniques of creating these
functionalities. Some of these reagent systems are specifi cally designed to form SH groups,
while others are crosslinkers that also can serve the dual purpose of sulfhydryl-generating agents.
Sulfhydryl groups are susceptible to oxidation and formation of disulfi de crosslinks. To pre-
vent disulfi de bond formation, remove oxygen from all buffers by degassing under vacuum and
bubbling an inert gas (i.e., nitrogen) through the solution. In addition, EDTA (0.01–0.1 M)
may be added to buffers to chelate metal ions, preventing metal-catalyzed oxidation of sulf-
hydryls. Some proteins of serum origin (particularly bovine serum albumin (BSA)) contain so
much contaminating metal ions (presumably iron from hemolyzed blood) that 0.1 M EDTA is
required to prevent this type of oxidation.
Modifi cation of Amines with 2-Iminothiolane (Traut ’ s Reagent)
Perham and Thomas (1971) originally prepared an imidoester compound containing a thiol
group, methyl 3-mercaptopropionimidate hydrochloride. The imidoester group can react with
amines to form a stable, charged linkage (Chapter 2, Section 1.10), while leaving a sulfhydryl
group available for further coupling ( Figure 1.59 ). Traut et al. (1973) subsequently synthesized an
analogous reagent containing one additional carbon, methyl 4-mercaptobutyrimidate. Later, this
compound was found to cyclize as a result of the sulfhydryl group reacting with the intrachain
4. Creating Specifi c Functionalities 67