8.4 H¨older Continuity of Second Derivatives 323
and D
2
u, respectively. Since Δu
(1)
j
= f on Ω, Δu = f on B
−
x
1
,ρ
1
.Consider
now the sequence {u
(1)
j
} on B
x
2
,ρ
2
. The above argument applies to this case
also and there is a subsequence {u
(2)
j
} of the {u
(1)
j
} sequence such that the
sequences {u
(2)
j
}, {Du
(2)
j
},and{D
2
u
(2)
j
} converge uniformly on B
−
x
2
,ρ
2
to con-
tinuous functions v, Dv,andD
2
v, respectively, on B
−
x
2
,ρ
2
with Δv = f on
B
−
x
2
,ρ
2
. The functions u and v must agree on B
−
x
1
,ρ
1
∩ B
−
x
2
,ρ
2
and v can be
relabeled as u so that u is defined on B
−
x
1
,ρ
1
∪ B
−
x
2
,ρ
2
. By an induction argu-
ment, for each i ≥ 2, there is a subsequence {u
(i)
j
} of the {u
(i−1)
j
} sequence
such that the sequences {u
(i)
j
}, {Du
(i)
j
},and{D
2
u
(i)
j
} converge uniformly
on
i
k=1
B
−
x
k
,ρ
k
to continuous functions u, Du,andD
2
u with Δu = f on
i
k=1
B
−
x
k
,ρ
k
. Finally, the diagonal sequence {u
(j)
j
} is a subsequence of every
sequence discussed above and there is a function u ∈ C
2
(Ω) such that the
sequences {u
(j)
j
}, {Du
(j)
j
},and{D
2
u
(j)
j
} converge uniformly on each compact
set Γ ⊂ Ω to the continuous functions u, Du,andD
2
u with u ∈ C
2
(Ω)and
Δu = f on Ω.
The requirement that f be bounded in Theorem 8.3.1 can be relaxed in
case Ω is a ball. The proof of the following theorem necessitates looking
at the effect of truncation of a function satisfying a H¨older condition. If
a, b, c are any real numbers, it is easily seen that |min (a, b) − min (a, c)|≤
|b − c|.Iff ∈ H
α
(Ω), 0 <α<1andk is any real number, then
|min (k, f(x)) − min (k, f(y))|≤|f(x) − f (y)| from which it follows that
the function min (f, k) ∈ H
α
(Ω).Thesameresultistrueofmax(f, k). In
particular, the functions f
j
in the following proof belong to H
α,loc
(B).
Theorem 8.4.4 If B is a ball in R
n
,b ∈ (−1, 0),α ∈ (0, 1),andf ∈
H
α,loc
(B) satisfies [f; d]
(2+b)
0,B
< +∞, there is then a unique function u ∈
C
0
(B
−
) ∩ C
2
(B) satisfying Δu = f on B and u =0on ∂B. Moreover,
[u; d]
(b)
0,B
≤ C[f; d]
(2+b)
0,B
(8.27)
where C = C(b, ρ).
Proof: Let B = B
x
0
,ρ
,r = |x − x
0
|,K =[f ; d]
(2+b)
0,B
,andv =(ρ
2
− r
2
)
−b
for
r ≤ ρ. Using the polar form of the Laplacian as in Section 1.3 and using the
fact that −n +2(1+b) < 0,
Δv =2b(ρ
2
− r
2
)
−b−2
n(ρ
2
− r
2
)+2(1+b)r
2
≤ 4b(1 + b)ρ
2
(ρ
2
− r
2
)
−b−2
≤ 4b(1 + b)ρ
−b
(ρ − r)
−b−2
.
Since d(x)
2+b
|f(x)|≤K by hypothesis and d(x)=ρ − r,
|f(x)|≤Kd(x)
−2−b
= K(ρ − r)
−b−2
≤ C
0
KΔv