256 Charged Particle and Photon Interactions with Matter
the FET as a reaction of a diversity of (rotational) conformers (instead of one uniform molecule
type), which by the electron jump forms a diversity of ionization products, replaces the commonly
used picture of mesomerism (Beyer and Walter, 1991) of substituted aromatic molecules in this case.
If at all such a mesomerism exists, then it is a property of the encounter complex, for which a rigid
and
energetically favored structure should exist.
The
main feature of FET consists in the fact that the femtosecond dynamic motions of (donor)
molecules are reected in a diffusion-controlled reaction taking place at the nanosecond tim-
escale. Therefore, with the used time-resolved spectroscopy, a steady state observation of the
transients, which appear in nanoseconds (see bimolecular reaction), is performed. However,
their structure is determined by femtosecond dynamics. Insofar, the FET is a new phenomenon
of reaction kinetics.
10.4.7 coMpariSon of et theorieS
Here, the classical ET models are sketched briey, mainly under the aspect of the distribution of
excess
energy of ET.
As
already mentioned, common interpretations of ET reactions are based on sum kinetics and use
equilibria for the energetic description (cf. reaction 10.8). To describe the dependence of the ET trans-
fer rate constant, k
s
(rate of the gross reaction), on the free energy change, ΔG
o
, two empirical attempts
formulated by Marcus (Marcus, 1964; Marcus and Sutin, 1964) and alternatively by Rehm and Weller
(1969) are used. In both models, the excess energy is distributed either within the reactant molecules or
in the solvent surroundings. In polar media, this reorganization energy concerns primarily the solvent
rearrangement, taking into account mainly excitation of the low-energy modes of the solvent.
In contrast to the situation discussed above, for nonpolar media, the solvent reorganization energy
is expected to play a minor role, and, hence, the reorganization of high-frequency intramolecular
vibrational modes will determine the ET rate. Taking into account the quantum nature of these
vibrations, the description of k
s
was modied. Using the concept of Ulstrup and Jortner (1975), the
ET in alkanes and alkyl chlorides (Brede etal., 1987) has been described. Taking C-H modes of the
solvent radical cation/solute couple, and treating the solvent part in a classical way as proposed by
Levich
and Dogonadze (1961), an expression for k
s
could be obtained.
In principle, the FET phenomenon can use parts of both theories discussed above. However,
the theory developed for nonpolar systems is more appropriate (Brede etal., 1987). It should be
noted that in FET, molecular dynamics plays a decisive role (Brede and Naumov, 2006) com-
pared to the classical descriptions of ET, which are based on a kinetic analysis using thermo-
dynamic data. The FET process, however, can only be understood in terms of intramolecular
mobility (vibrations and bending motions) of the donor. With the peculiarity of a prompt electron
jump taking place in the rst approach of the reaction partners, instead of one type of donor mol-
ecules, we have to take into account a dynamic diversity of conformers with different electron
distributions in the momentum of the electron jump. This leads to the distinction of two types of
rotation conformers. These conformers react with solvent radical cations, forming at rst donor
radical cations of different stability (dissociative and metastable), which nally result in different
products (fragments and metastable radical cations). Most of these events occur in the femtosec-
ond time domain (dissociation), or even faster (electron jump). Considering bimolecular FET, a
kinetic paradox is observed, that is, instead of the slowest step, the fastest one determines the
reaction path.
Overall, FET is an electron transfer process that is governed by molecular dynamics. Apart from
the unusual “two-product” situation, it is also noteworthy that the endergonic fragmentation prod-
ucts derived from the dissociative radical cations do not follow the rules of the classical energetic
analysis
(Baidak etal., 2008a).
To
illustrate the discussion on the time range of FET and common ETs, in Figure 10.14, relevant
processes are assigned to a logarithmic timescale. This should visualize the crucial distinction