
40 CHE GUEVARA
As he saw things, this situation refl ected the fact that the new govern-
ment’s leaders were not solving the root causes of Bolivia’s problems.
They were merely trying to ameliorate the effects of these problems
and calm the country’s discontented masses. Thus, in the case of the
peasants, the government was spraying them to rid them of lice rather
than pursuing policies that would genuinely improve the social and eco-
nomic conditions that were the cause of their poverty and their lack of
proper hygiene.
At this point in his political development, Ernesto was neither a
Marxist nor a revolutionary. He was defi nitely a political nonconformist
with a keen sense of social justice, but these traits had not yet led him
to espouse any particular political cause or ideology. Rojo recalls that,
when they fi rst met, Ernesto was uncertain about what he wanted to
do with his life, although he was very sure about what he did not want
to do with it. According to Rojo, Ernesto demanded that his traveling
companions be willing to walk interminably, be devoid of any concern
for the condition of their clothing, and accept without anguish the state
of being absolutely without money.
In September 1953, Ernesto and Calica left Bolivia for Peru. They
went to visit Machu Picchu, the lost city of the Incas, and Cuzco, both
of which Ernesto wanted to revisit. He noted in his diary that he missed
Alberto. He wrote: “Despite Calica’s enthusiasm for this place, I still miss
Alberto’s company,” and, he added, “the way in which our characters
were so suited to each other is becoming more obvious to me here in
Machu-Picchu” (page 13). They went to Lima, where they visited Dr. Pesce
and the people at the leprosarium, who received them very cordially.
They bumped into Rojo in Lima and made plans to meet up again in
Guayaquil, Ecuador. While in Lima, Ernesto wrote his leftist friend from
medical school in Buenos Aires, Tita Infante, an interesting letter on
September 3, 1953, in which he described his visit to Bolivia. He wrote:
“Bolivia is a country that has given a major example to the American
continent,” and “the fi ghting still goes on, and almost every night people
are wounded by gunfi re on one side or the other. But the government is
supported by the armed people, so there is no possibility of liquidating an
armed movement from outside; it can succumb only as a result of inter-
nal dissensions” (page 17).
As Richard Gott notes: “Guevara was intrigued by what he saw [in
Bolivia], but he was far from impressed by the caliber of Bolivia’s revo-