making an irrevocable commitment was of great importance in
protecting the political position of the Jafnid and Nas
rid elites.
Chapter 3, ‘Empires, Clients, and Politics’, explores the political
development of the Jafnids and the Nas
rids from a number of per-
spectives, including that of the integration of barbarians into the
Roman Empire in Late Antiquity. Here, the discussion also uses the
example of the H
˙
ujrids of central Arabia to highlight the processes
being analysed. The chapter shows how state support for particular
pre-eminent individuals encouraged political power to crystallise
around single ruling dynastic families. These families—the Jafnids,
H
˙
ujrids and Nas
rids—derived much of their power from ongoing
state sponsorship. This type of centralisation of power also improved
the functioning of links between client and sponsor. This chapter gives
particular attention to the literary, epigraphic, and limited archaeo-
logical evidence which shows how the Jafnids integrated into the world
of Roman late antique elites. At the same time, it also shows how
integration into the two empires produced a perhaps unintended
consequence—an increasing sense of political and diplomatic auton-
omy for the Jafnids and Nas
rids, up to the last quarter of the sixth
century. The general processes at work here are also found within the
more general schema of Near Eastern centre–periphery relationships,
showing how the Jafnids and Nas
rids can be integrated into broad
historical concerns.
Chapter 4, ‘Arabic, Culture, and Ethnicity’, is the last of the three
thematic chapters. It examines the extremely problematic question of
whether or not Arabic stood as a distinct marker of ethnic identity,
before the advent of Islam and the Muslim conquests of the Near East
developed the association between language and identity in a new
direction. The chapter discusses the evidence for Old Arabic, includ-
ing the three Arabic-language and Arabic-script inscriptions of the
sixth century, as well as the evidence for the corpus of oral poetry. It
also addresses the Nemāra inscription, with its problematic phrase,
‘king of all of (the) Arab(s)’. I suggest here that, although it is not
possible to answer definitively the question posed at the beginning of
the chapter, it is productive to approach the question of what sig-
nificance should be attached to the numerous linguistic developments
within the broader political concerns discussed in the previous chap-
ter. I suggest here that the appearance of Arabic on monumental elite
inscriptions, the production of poetry, and developments in the script
are perhaps best understood in parallel with the growth in status and
viii Preface