
Introduction to Derivatives 307
of $10. Reducing this gain by the cost of the option ($2), the inves-
tor will realize a net profit from this position of $8.
4. The intrinsic value is $110 – 100 = $10. That is, an option buyer
exercising the option and simultaneously selling the underlying asset
would realize $110 from the sale of the underlying, which would be
covered by acquiring the underlying from the option writer for $100,
thereby netting a $10 gain. This option is “in the money.” When the
exercise price of a call option exceeds the current price of the underly-
ing, the call option is out-of-the money and has no intrinsic value. If
the exercise price is equal to the current price it is at-the-money and
also has no intrinsic value (0).
For a put option, the intrinsic value is equal to the amount by
which the current price of the underlying is below the exercise price:
$100 – 90 = $10. The buyer of the put option who exercises the put
option and simultaneously sells the underlying will net $10 by exer-
cising. The asset will be sold to the writer for $100 and purchased in
the market for $90. For the put option, it would be: in-the-money
when the price of the underlying is less than exercise price, out-of-the
money when the current price exceeds the exercise price, and at-the-
money when the exercise price is equal to the current price.
5. Consider a corn farmer and a canning company that uses the corn in
the operation of its business. The concern of the farmer is that the
price of corn will decline, thereby forcing him (or her) to sell his corn
at a lower price. The concern of the canning company is that the price
of corn will increase, resulting in a rise in its production costs. Con-
sider first the farmer; suppose the corn will be available at a time
when the farmer can sell a corn futures contract to deliver corn for
$X per bushel. The number of bushels expected to be sold will deter-
mine how many bushels of corn the farmer will seek to deliver. By
selling futures, the farmer has locked in a price of $X per bushel.
Consequently, even if the price of corn is $X – 2 per bushel, the
farmer will receive $X per bushel. If instead, the price of corn is $X +
2 per bushel, the farmer has given up the opportunity to benefit from
a higher price because he has agreed to accept $X per bushel.
Now let’s look at the canner. By buying a corn futures contract,
the canner can assure that the price at which it must purchase corn
will be no higher than $X per bushel. So, if corn increases to $X + 2
per bushel, the canner only needs to pay $X per bushel. In contrast, if
the price of corn decreases to $X – 2 per bushel, the canner gave up
the opportunity to benefit from a lower cost for corn.
SolCh4 Page 307 Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:24 AM