42
Richardson noted in his Theory of Painting (1715), likeness was simply not
enough: the portrait painter's aims should be 'to raise the Character: To divest
an Unbred Person of his Rusticity, and give him something at least of a
Gentleman. To make one of a moderate Share of good Sense appear to have a
Competency, a Wise Man to be mere Wise, and a Brave Man to be more so ... is
absolutely necessary to a good Face-Painter'.
The instant success of Van Loo on his arrival from Paris in 1737 resulted
not only from the prevailing French fashion but also from his ability to capture
a more distinct likeness than his native rivals. The exception is Hogarth, whose
success as a portrait painter in the 17408 was partly inspired by the French
challenge. His achievement lay in a fresh, direct and solid appreciation of the
sociability of his sitters, who were often middle-class. Only Highmore could
occasionally match Hogarth's vein of informality. Informality is also the most
distinguishing characteristic of the Conversation Piece – portraiture in a social
context – which became increasingly popular from the 1720s.
In the mid-century fashionable portraiture was dominated by the prolific
Hudson, and by Ramsay, who both employed the services of Van Aken for their
drapery painting. Ramsay, with his Italian training, could at his most
accomplished rival the best in Europe, and until the young Reynolds returned
from Italy in 1753 his supremacy was unchallenged. Despite his technical
shortcomings, Reynolds was the most original and creative portrait painter of
the century. In attempting to elevate portraiture from the mundane level of 'face
painting' to the more esteemed academic genre of History, Reynolds used his
breadth of learning and knowledge of the Old masters to achieve that almost
inexhaustible variety of pose that occasioned Gainsborough's envious outburst,
'Damn him, how various he is!'.
Gainsborough and Reynolds, the supreme portrait painters of the later 18
century could hardly be more different. Unlike Reynolds (who used assistants)
Gainsborough revelled in painting sumptuous draperies and shimmering
reflections on rich surface textures with a delicacy 4nd ease of handling rarely
found in the work of his fellow countrymen. His mature style of the 1760s and
1770s owes much to Van Dyck.
Rommey, who in the late 1770s seriously challenged his elder rivals, seems
to have modelled his style on the casual nonchalance of Batoni, whose works he
saw in Rome in 1773 – 5. After the death of Gainsborough and Reynolds the
vacuum was filled by Beechey and Hoppner until the dazzling and vivacious
talent of Lawrence eclipsed his rivals in the last years of the century.
ANALYSING
Revise the information about portraiture and make a table ‘The Evolution
of British Portraiture’.