
310 Giorgio Rovero and Norberto Piccinini
a function of D, H, θ , d
p
, and U/U
ms
. The sensitivity analysis of the last variable demon-
strated that, by moderately increasing the gas velocity, additional solids circulation was
obtained with more convective heat transfer to the annulus and an improved reaction
rate, sufficient to compensate for increased gas bypassing in the spout.
A dynamic analysis
10
with 10 percent changes in temperature and inlet concentration
demonstrated different responses for the spout and annulus, because of their different
thermal capacity and particle/fluid interaction. New steady states were obtained after a
20- to 30-min transition. A moderate flow rate increase at the inlet initially caused an
inverse response, followed by overall similar dynamics. The operability goals defined
the control system design: the output concentration was selected as the control variable,
with the inlet concentration as the main disturbance and the temperature or inlet flow
rate as manipulated variables. Several control schemes were simulated and compared.
In a concise communication,
11
it was demonstrated that the “one-dimensional model”
and “streamtube model” do not provide different overall conversions when a first-order
reaction is considered, provided that the same hydrodynamic representations and the
same mass transfer assumptions are included in both models. Based on general reactor
engineering considerations, it was proved that the one-dimensional model predicts higher
overall conversions for reactions of order less than unity, whereas the streamtube model
generates higher conversions for reaction orders greater than one. It was noted that if the
problem were tackled by a detailed experimental program, radial concentration profiles
at different depths in the annulus would be helpful in discriminating between the models.
A fur ther simple model was based on a phenomenological evaluation of the gas
hydrodynamics, with the spout having well-defined plug flow, whereas some mixing
was inferred in the annulus. This description
12
was defined as “semicompartmental,” as
the annulus was represented by two perfectly mixed regions in series. By assuming an
annulus gas velocity profile as given by the Mamuro and Hattori equation,
4
evaluated at
the dimensionless bed heights, z/H, of 0.25 and 0.75, the description of the two stages was
straightforward. The predicted overall gas conversion was a function of d
p
, k, U/U
ms
, and
a spout–annulus mass transfer coefficient. No maximum conversion was predicted with
increasing bed depth, unlike the original model.
2
The experimental results available at
that time were in s atisfactory ag r eement, although the semicompartmental representation
makes no allowance for radial variations in the reacting species concentration.
19.2 Applied studies
An exothermic reaction, CO oxidation over a Co
3
O
4
/α-Al
2
O
3
catalyst, was used to
demonstrate the validity of a reactor model
13
for an adiabatic spouted bed. The theoretical
description was based a priori on the definition of all variables acting in a spouted bed
reactor. Considering a flat-based vessel, the model refers to an inlet region in which the
gas expands before generating the actual spout, the peripheral annulus, a fountain core
as an extension of the spout, and an axisymmetric downflowing fountain. The model
predicted that the fountain contributed significantly to the reaction. Heat generated on
the catalyst particles was then transferred to the gas by convection, as in a slowly moving