
172
U.
ZIMMERMAN
et
al.
later, does not apply in our case. In the following
paragraphs we will often specify the positions of the
metal atoms relative to the central CW molecule. This
is done for clarity and is not meant to imply any di-
rect interaction between the
c60
and the atoms of the
second layer.
In constructing the second layer, it seems reason-
able to expect this layer to preserve some of the char-
acteristic symmetry elements
of
the first layer (Le., the
fivefold axes). The second layer on
c60
contains
72
atoms, a number being indivisible by 5. This requires
that each of the five-fold symmetry axes passes
through two metal atoms. Consequently, in the sec-
ond layer there must be one metal atom situated above
each of the
12
pentagonal faces of
c60.
Let
us
first
assume that the second layer has the full icosahedral
symmetry
I,,
of the first layer. The remaining 60 at-
oms may then be arranged basically in two different
ways. The first would be to place the atoms such that
they are triply coordinated to the atoms of the first
layer (i.e., placing them above the carbon atoms of the
C6,
molecule as shown in Fig.
4
on the upper left).
The atoms above the pentagons of
c60
(black) consti-
tute the vertices of an icosahedron, the other atoms
(white) resemble the C,,-cage. This structure can also
be visualized as twelve caps, each consisting of a
5-atom ring around an elevated central atom, placed
at the vertices
of
an icosahedron. This structure, how-
ever, does not result in an even coverage: there are
20
large openings above the hexagonal faces of
Cm
while
neighboring caps overlap above the double bonds
of
C,,.
Pictured on the upper right in Fig.
4
is a second
way to arrange the 60 atoms with Ih symmetry, ob-
tained by rotating each of the caps described above by
Fig.
4.
Three possible geometries for arranging the
72
atoms
of the second layer: the atoms above the pentagons
of
Cs0
are shaded. The structure on the upper left can be trans-
formed into the more evenly distributed arrangement of
atoms on the upper right by
36"
turns of the caps around the
five-fold axes. From this, the structure on the bottom can be
obtained by rotating each triangular face of atoms
by
19".
one-tenth of
a
turn (36") around the 5-fold axis
through its center. The coordination to the atoms of
the first layer will then be only two-fold, but the cov-
erage will be quite even, making the latter of these two
structures the more probable one.
The latter structure could be described as an 'edge-
truncated icosahedron' with
20
triangular faces, each
face consisting of the three atoms at the icosahedral
vertices with
a
smaller, almost densely packed trian-
gle of three atoms set in between (exemplarily, one of
these triangles has been shaded). Note that this layer,
having no atoms right on the edges, is not identical to
a
Mackay icosahedron[l6] which is formed by pure al-
kaline earth metal clusters[lO,l
l].
However, in this
structure the two rows
of
atoms forming the truncated
edges are not close-packed within the layer. This might
be a hint that with the structure depicted on the up-
per right in Fig.
4
we have not yet found the most sta-
ble configuration of the second layer.
Up to this point, we have assumed that the second
layer of atoms preserves the full symmetry (Ih) of
the fullerene inside. Let
us
now allow the second layer
to lower its symmetry. This can be done in a simple
way: model the interaction between metal atoms by a
short-range pair potential with an appropriate equi-
librium distance and let the atoms
of
the second layer
move freely within this potential on top of the first
layer. This allows the atoms to move to more highly
coordinated positions. Starting with atoms in the ar-
rangement with Ih-symmetry, the layer will relax
spontaneously by rotating
all
20
triangular faces of at-
oms around their three-fold axes by approximately
19". The resulting structure is shown at the bottom of
Fig.
4.
One of the rotated triangles has been shaded
and the angle of rotation marked. In a projection on
a plane perpendicular to the threefold axis, each pair
of atoms at the edges of the triangle lie on a straight
line with one of the three atoms on the surrounding
icosahedral vertices. The two rows
of
atoms along the
former truncated edges have now shifted by the radius
of one atom relative to each other in direction of the
edge, leading to close packing at the edges. Of course,
the triangles could have been rotated counterclockwise
by the same angle, resulting in the stereoisomer
of
the
structure described above. This structure no longer has
Ih-symmetry. There are no reflection planes and no
inversion symmetry. Only the two-, three-, and five-
fold axes remain. The structure belongs to the point
group
I
(order 60).
I
is the largest subgroup of I,,.
The layer has, thus, undergone the minimum reduc-
tion in symmetry.
Of the three arrangements of atoms in the second
layer shown in Fig.
4,
we find the one on the bottom
(symmetry I) the most probable. It optimizes the co-
ordination of neighboring atoms within the layer and,
as we will see further down, this arrangement can also
be well extended to C,, coated with metal.
Of course, after having observed two complete layers
of
metal around a fullerene, we searched for evidence
for the formation of additional layers. However, be-
fore looking at experimental data, let
us
try to con-