HUMAN PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO SELECTION
REFERENCES
1. De Sutter P, Gerris J, Dhont M. A health-economic decision-analytic
model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI.
Hum Reprod 2002; 15: 402–9.
2. Gerris J, De Sutter P, De Neubourg D et al. A real-life prospective
health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-
embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod 2004; 19:
917–23.
3. Lukassen HG, Schonbeck Y, Adang EM et al. Cost analysis of singleton
versus twin pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2004;
81: 1240–6.
4. Nyboe Andersen A, Gianaroli L, Nygren KG. Assisted reproductive
technology in Europe, 2000. Results generated from European regis-
ters by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 490–503.
5. Giorgetti C, Terriou P, Auquier P et al. Embryo score to predict
implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo
transfers. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 2427–31.
6. Ziebe S, Petersen K, Lindenberg S et al. Embryo morphology or cleav-
age stage: how to select the best embryos for transfer after in-vitro
fertilization. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1545–9.
7. Rijinders PM, Jansen CAM. The predictive value of day 3 embryo
morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy, and implan-
tation rate after day 5 transfer following in vitro fertilization or intra-
cytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 2869–73.
8. Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, De Neubourg D et al. Characterization
of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer. Hum
Reprod 1999; 14: 2345–9.
9. Milki AA, Hinckley MD, Gebhardt J et al.Accuracy of day 3 criteria for
selecting the best embryos. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 1191–5.
10. Scott L, Alvero R, Leondires M et al. The morphology of human
pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development
and implantation. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 2394–403.
11. Neuber E, Mahutte NG, Arici A et al. Sequential embryo assessment
outperforms investigator-driven morphological assessment at select-
ing a good quality blastocyst. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 794–6.
12. Munne S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z et al. Diagnosis of major chromosome
aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod 1993;
8: 2185–91.
13. Delhanty JD, Harper JC, Ao A et al. Multicolour FISH detects frequent
chromosomal mosaicism and chaotic division in normal preimplanta-
tion embryos from fertile patients. Hum Genet 1997; 99: 755–60.
14. Laverge H, De Sutter P, Verschraegen-Spae MR et al. Triple colour
fluorescent in-situ hybridization for chromosomes X, Y and 1 on
spare human embryos. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 809–14.
15. Iwarsson E, Lundqvist M, Inzunza J et al. A high degree of aneuploidy
in frozen-thawed human preimplantation embryos. Hum Genet 1999;
104: 376–82.
16. Voullaire L, Slater H, Williamson R et al. Chromosome analysis of
blastomeres from human embryos by using comparative genomic
hybridization. Hum Genet 2000; 106: 210–7.
17. Wells D, Delhanty JD. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of
human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification
and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod
2000; 6: 1055–62.
18. Sandalinas M, Sadowy S, Alikani M et al. Developmental ability of
chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blasto-
cyst stage. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1954–8.
19. Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical and struc-
tural chromosome abnormalities. Reprod Biomed Online 2002; 4:
183–96.
20. Boue J, Boue A, Lazar P. Retrospective and prospective epidemiological
studies of 1500 karyotypes human spontaneous abortions. Teratology
1975; 12: 11–26.
21. Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J et al. A cytogenetic study of 1000
spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet 1980; 44: 151–78.
22. Menasha J, Levy B, Hirschhorn K et al. Incidence and spectrum of
chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortions: new insights
from a 12-year study. Genet Med 2005; 7: 251–63.
23. Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP et al. Preimplantation diagnosis
for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a
poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be
proposed. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 837–44.
24. Munne S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T et al.Improved implantation after
preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reprod Biomed
Online 2003; 7: 91–7.
25. Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A et al. Preimplantation genetic diag-
nosis for aneuploidy screening in women older than 37 years. Fertil
Steril 2005; 84: 319–24.
26. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D et al. Comparative genomic
hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors.
Science 1992; 258: 818–21.
27. Telenius H, Carter NP, Bebb CE et al. Degenerate oligonucleotide-
primed PCR: general amplification of target DNA by a single degener-
ate primer. Genomics 1992; 13: 718–25.
28. Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH et al. Detailed chromosomal and
molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplifica-
tion and comparative genomic hybridisation. Nucleic Acids Res 1999;
27: 1214–8.
29. Voullaire L, Wilton L, McBain J et al. Chromosome abnormalities
identified by comparative genomic hybridization in embryos from
women with repeated implantation failure. Mol Hum Reprod 2002; 8:
1035–41.
30. Wilton L, Voullaire L, Sargeant P et al. Preimplantation aneuploidy
screening using comparative genomic hybridization or fluorescence in
situ hybridization of embryos from patients with recurrent implanta-
tion failure. Fertil Steril 2003; 80: 860–8.
31. Bahce M, Cohen J, Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of
aneuploidy: were we looking at the wrong chromosomes? J Assist
Reprod Genet 1999; 16: 176–81.
32. Munne S, Bahce M, Sandalinas M et al. Differences in chromosome
susceptibility to aneuploidy and survival to first trimester. Reprod
Biomed Online 2004; 8: 81–90.
33. Wilton L, Williamson R, McBain J et al. Birth of a healthy infant after
preimplantation confirmation of euploidy by comparative genomic
hybridization. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1537–41.
34. Wells D, Escudero T, Levy B et al. First clinical application of compar-
ative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplanta-
tion genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 543–9.
35. Wells D, Steuerwald N, Chu L et al. Microarrays for analysis and diag-
nosis of human embryos. In: Papp Z, Rodeck C, eds. Recent Advances
in Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis. Bologna: Medimond, 2004: 9–17.
36. Hu DG, Webb G, Hussey N. Aneuploidy detection in single cells using
DNA array-based comparative genomic hybridisation. Mol Hum
Reprod 2004; 10: 283–9.
37. Le Caignec C, Spits C, Sermon K et al. Single-cell chromosomal imbal-
ances detection by array CGH. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34: e68.
38. Wittwer CT, Herrmann MG, Moss AA et al. Continuous fluorescence
monitoring of rapid cycle DNA amplification. BioTechniques 1997;
22: 130–8.
39. Wells D, Bermudez MG, Steuerwald N et al. Expression of genes regu-
lating chromosome segregation, the cell cycle and apoptosis during