lucrative; the bishops had drained their parishes to appease the King;
and no gold poured in from America such as daily succored England's
enemy, the Emperor. Yet one institution in England was wealthy,
suspect, decrepit, and defenseless: the monasteries. They were suspect
because their ultimate allegiance was to the pope, and their
subscription to the Act of Supremacy was considered insincere and
incomplete; they were, in the eyes of the government, a foreign body
in the nation, bound to support any Catholic movement against the
King. They were decrepit because they had in many cases ceased to
perform their traditional functions of education, hospitality, and
charity. They were defenseless because the bishops resented their
exemption from episcopal control; because the nobility, impoverished
by civil war, coveted their wealth; because the business classes
looked upon monks and friars as idling wasters of natural resources;
and because a large section of the commonalty, including many good
Catholics, no longer believed in the efficacy of the relics that the
monks displayed, or in the Masses that the monks, if paid, offered for
the dead. And there were excellent precedents for closing monasteries;
Zwingli had done it in Zurich, the Lutheran princes in Germany, Wolsey
in England. Parliament had already (1533) voted authority to the
government to visit the monasteries and compel their reform.
In the summer of 1535 Cromwell sent out a trio of "visitors," each
with a numerous staff, to examine and report on the physical, moral,
and financial condition of the monasteries and nunneries of England,
and, for good measure, the universities and episcopal sees as well.
These "visitors" were "young, impetuous men, likely to execute their
work rather thoroughly than delicately"; `06254 they were not immune
to "presents"; `06255 "the object of their mission was to get up a
case for the Crown, and they probably used every means in their
power to induce the monks and the nuns to incriminate
themselves." `06256 It was not difficult to find, among the 600
monasteries of England, an impressive number that showed sexual-
sometimes homosexual- deviations, `06257 loose discipline, acquisitive
exploitation of false relics, sale of sacred vessels or jewelry to add
to monastic wealth and comforts, `06258 neglect of ritual,
hospitality, or charity. `06259 But the reports usually failed to
state the proportion of offending to meritorious monks, and to