although flagging tape can be used to thread through the punched holes in the
sample bag. These bags are tough and wet-resistant so rarely end up soggy or torn
at the end of the day.
For twigs and foliage [also mull, humus or peat] a fabric bag is preferred but not
essential. An example of a suitable bag is the ‘‘Sentry Sample Bag’’ (or similar),
that can be seen on webpage www.csinet.ca/files/catflyer/CFE-Catalog.pdf. These
bags are made from spun-bonded polypropylene that is a strong and very light-
weight fabric with excellent filtration qualities, such that moisture is readily re-
leased from the enclosed materials. They have a white polished drawstring making
them easy to close under all weather conditions. They can be easily marked with
indelible felt markers. The bags are rot and mildew resistant, and are supplied in
five sizes of which the most suitable for biogeochemical samples are 14 22 cm
and 18 33 cm. Their current cost is approximately $1 each. Chemical analysis
of these bags shows that they have trace metal concentrations below the detection
limit of ICP-MS, except for barely detectable (sub-ppm) concentrations of Cu, Pb
and Zn. Consequently, the bags can be used with the assurance that they will not
transfer any detectable contamination to the contained samples.
Heavy-duty coarse brown paper bags (e.g., 7–9 kg hardware bags) can be used if
conditions are dry, but they are somewhat more cumbersome. A size of
20 30 cm is usually suitable. Even lightweight brown paper lunch bags can be
used in dry conditions, but double-bagging is recomm ended and samples with a
high moisture content (such as leaves) degrade the paper to a pulp in quite a short
period of time. Consequently, these bags should be used in emergency situations,
only, and the vegetation transferred to more robust bags as soon as possible
(preferably the same day). Paper bags can vary considerably in composition, and
since brown paper is typically recycled from pulp, the meta l content can be sub-
stantially higher than that contained in fabric bags. This is not a problem provided
none of the paper bag itself gets processed with the vegetation samples.
Plasticized aerated bags with drawstrings are tough, light and convenient, but
less desirable, because samples should not be left in these bags for several weeks or
they will grow mould. If mould should develop, the samples are unpleasant to
handle and some remobilization of elements from the plant tissues to the mould
takes place.
Calico cloth bags should be avoided because they may rot and contaminate the
sample from the fungicide with which they are commonly treated. Organic samples
from the tropics are highly biologically active and acidic, such that natural ma-
terials (e.g., cotton bags) readily decompose. Analysis of these bags has reveal ed up
to 50 ppm As and/or 50 ppm Sb in the material of dry, new calico bags that have
been treated with fungicides. Othe r elements somewh at enriched are Ba, Fe, Mg,
Na, Au and Sn. Whereas leachin g of As and Sb from the bag to its contents may be
of concern, concentrations of the other elements are not likely to be of signi ficance,
because either they are already present in relatively high concentrations (e.g., Ba,
Fe, Mg) or relative to the bulk of the vegetation sample, the addition of metals
from the bag to the vegetation is likely to be insignificant (e.g ., Au, Sn).
112
Field Guide 2: Sample Selection and Collection