In one dimension, recall that the second derivative measures concavity. Suppose y = f(x);
if f''(x) is positive, y is concave up, and if f''(x) is negative, y is concave down. The
Laplacian may be thought of as a generalization of the concavity concept to multivariate
functions.
This idea is demonstrated at the right, in one dimension: u(x) = x
3
− x. To the left of x = 0,
the Laplacian (simply the second derivative here) is negative, and the graph is concave
down. At x = 0, the curve inflects and the Laplacian is 0. To the right of x = 0, the
Laplacian is positive and the graph is concave up.
Concavity may or may not do it for you. Thankfully, there's another very important view
of the Laplacian, with deep implications for any equation it shows itself in: the Laplacian
compares the value of u at some point in space to the average of the values of u in the
neighborhood of the same point. The three cases are:
If u is greater at some point then the average of its neighbors, .
If u is at some point equal to the average of its neighbors, .
If u is smaller at some point then the average of its neighbors, .
So the laplacian may be thought of as, at some point (x
0
,y
0
,z
0
):