Existence of additive identity: there is an element in F notated 0, sometimes
called the sum of no numbers, such that a + 0 = a.
Existence of multiplicative identity: there is an element in F notated 1 different
from 0, sometimes called the product of no numbers, such that .
Existence of additive inverse: there is an element in F associated with a notated
− a such that a − a = 0.
Existence of multiplicative inverse: there is an element in F associated with a (if
a is nonzero), notated 1 / a such that .
These are called the field axioms. The field that we deal with, by far the most common
one, is the real field. The set associated with the real field is the set of real numbers, and
addition and multiplication are the familiar operations that everyone knows about.
Another example of a set that can form a field is the set of rational numbers, numbers
which are expressible as the ratio of two integers. An example of a common set that
doesn't form a field is the set of integers: there generally is no multiplicative inverse
since the reciprocal of an integer generally is not an integer.
Note that when we say that an object is in F, what is meant is that the object is a member
of the set associated in the field and that it complies with the field axioms.
The Vector
Most non-mathematics students are taught that vectors are ordered groups ("tuples") of
quantities. This is not complete, vectors are a lot more general than that. Informally, a
vector is defined as an object that can be scaled and added with other vectors. This
will be made more specific soon.
Examples of vectors:
The real numbers.
Pairs, triples, etc of real numbers.
Polynomials.
Most functions.
Examples of objects that are not vectors:
Members of the extended real numbers. Specifically, the infinity and negative
infinity elements neither scale nor add.
The integers, at least when scaled by real numbers (since the result will not
necessarily be an integer).
An interesting (read: confusing) fact to note is that, by the definition above, matrices and
even tensors qualify as vectors since they can be scaled or added, even though these
objects are considered generalizations of more "conventional" vectors, and calling a
tensor a vector will lead to confusion.