Cambridge Histories Online © Cambridge University Press, 2008
P1: GDZ
0521812909bbs CB929-Bulmer 052181290 9 September 30, 2005 16:39
704 Bibliographical Essays
la emigraci
´
on espa
˜
nola, 1880–1930 (Madrid, 1995) (also the article “Those Who
Left and Those Who Stayed Behind: Explaining Emigration from the Regions of
Spain, 1880–1914,” Journal of Economic History 60, 3 [2000], 730–55) for Spain; and
Joachim Costa Leite, “Portugal and Emigration, 1855–1914,” (Ph.D. dissertation,
Columbia University, 1993).
Section II
Immigration policies in LatinAmerica havebeen studied from national perspectives
and there is not any comparative study. Ashley Timmer and Jeffrey G. Williamson,
“Immigration Policy Prior to the 1930s: Labor Markets, Policy Interactions, and
Globalization Backlash,” Population and Development Review 24, 4 (1998), 739–
71 include Argentina and Brazil in their index of migratory policies in the New
World. James Foreman-Peck also provides a general analysis of immigration policies
(James Foreman-Peck, “A Political Economy Model of International Migration,
1815–1914,” The Manchester School 60, 4 [1992], 359–76).
A basic reading on legislation and immigration policies for Southern Cone
countries is Hern
´
an A. Silva, ed., Legislaci
´
on y pol
´
ıtica inmigratoria en el cono
sur de Am
´
erica: Argentina, Brasil, Uruguay (M
´
exico, 1987). Both Argentinean and
Brazilian policies have received special attention, particularly the Brazilian pro-
gram of subsidized immigration. See Thomas H. Holloway, “Creating the Reserve
Army? The Immigration Program of Sao Paulo, 1886–1930,” International Migra-
tion Review 22, 2 (1978), 187–209;Holloway, Immigrants on the Land. Coffee and
Society in S
˜
ao Paulo, 1886–1934 (Chapel Hill, 1980); and Fernando J. Devoto,
“Pol
´
ıticas migratorias argentinas y flujo de poblaci
´
on europea, 1876–1925,” in F.
Devoto, ed., Estudios sobre la emigraci
´
on italiana a la Argentina en la segunda mitad
del siglo XIX (Napoli, 1991). See also Chiara Evangelista, La braccia per la fazenda:
immigrati e “caipiras” nella formazione del mercato di lavoro paulista (1850–1930)
(Milan, 1982), for an interesting comparison on the distortion in the immigra-
tion flow caused by Brazilian subsidies. The short-lived Argentinean program for
subsidizing immigration in the late 1880sisanalyzed by M. Silvia Ospital, “La
inmigraci
´
on subsidiada y las oficinas de informaci
´
on, 1887–1890,” in Jornadas de
Inmigraci
´
on (Buenos Aires, 1985), 441–56.
The consequences of different immigration policies for the receiving countries
are analyzed by Alan M. Taylor, “Mass Migration to Distant Southern Shores.
Argentina and Australia, 1870–1939,” (previously cited); and Alan M. Taylor,
“External Dependence, Demographic Burden and Argentine Economic Devel-
opment After the Belle Epoque,” Journal of Economic History 52 (1992), 907–36,
comparing Argentina and Australia.
For comparisons with the United States and Australian policies, see Claudia
Goldin, “The Political Economy of Immigration Restriction in the United States,
1890 to 1921,” in Claudia Goldin and Gary Libecap, eds., The Regulated Economy,
AHistorical Approach to Political Economy (Chicago, 1994), 223–57;Roger Daniels
and Otis L. Graham, Debating American Immigration, 1882–Present (Lanham, MD,
2001); and David Pope, “Population and Australian Economic Development,