A Personal View of the Early Days of Mechatronics in Relation to Aerospace 239
From the systems experience and the confidence gained, a new approach to the
design process evolved, top-down design across all systems. It was at this point
that the essence of mechatronics came into play, although it was not seen as such.
There was a reluctance to embrace what was seen as a discipline in name only,
and there was a difficulty in accepting that what the aviation industry was
involved with was anything other than systems engineering.
Personal early experiences did nothing to allay that feeling. All mechatronics
meetings could be guaranteed to commence with a debate on the latest thoughts on
the subject! It is interesting that Google, on being asked for information on the
subject, asks the question, “Did I mean macaroni?”. The Experimental Aircraft
Programme (EAP), the forerunner to the Typhoon, was the first occasion where
from personal experience the various mechanical and electronic systems were
viewed as an entity where common software and computing modules were shared.
This approach enabled a true top-down design to be implemented. For the first
time, the aircraft was treated as a whole, with the interactions between all systems
being considered.
To aid understanding, consider a typical situation where the aircraft is coming
in to land and the pilot selects ‘undercarriage down’. Consider what is involved.
Prior to the selection of ‘undercarriage down’, the aircraft is in a clean
configuration with the relevant flight programme engaged. As the landing gear
comes down, there is a considerable change in the aerodynamics and a
corresponding change in handling characteristics. In the past, this required the
pilot to manually change the trim at a particularly busy time in the flight. With the
new approach, the selection of ‘undercarriage down’ not only deployed the
undercarriage, but also selected a matching aerodynamic programme, much
reducing the pilot workload!
Through this holistic approach, the role of the pilot was now able to be
reassessed. Much of the routine housekeeping could now be left to the system with
the pilots’ role focussed on doing what humans are best at, creative thinking.
Artificial intelligence has since come a long way and much of routine flying can
now be safely left to the system.
Other developments which have taken place in recent years, such as intelligent
skins and structures, were always considered a possibility as were such things as
eyeball and neural control, all of which could certainly be considered as being
mechatronic. There is, however, a time lag between the development of concepts
such as these and the availability of technologies capable of implementing them.
Part of the task at BAe Systems is that of being aware of the research being
undertaken in academic institutes, especially ‘Blue Skies’ research. Part of that
responsibility is to establish contacts at universities, to be aware of developments
and what they might offer in the future. This is by no means a one way exercise
and both sides benefit from the relationships so formed!
At a personal level, it has been my long held belief that in military systems, the
pilot or operator would be better placed on the ground than in the machine as they
are more valuable than a machine, take longer to replace and can be upgraded
much more cost effectively!