territories and allies, there was a serious clash between rhetoric and
the reality of Japanese control and economic exploitation.The latter
included the setting of exchange rates so as to enable Japan to gain
food, raw materials and manufactured goods cheaply.The notion of
racial equality did not match the treatment of the Chinese and
others. Possibilities for more benign developments were wrecked as
much by the logic of Japanese control as by the impact of Japanese
failures, and the Japanese gained relatively little willing support.
22
Thailand, which had briefly resisted the Japanese landings on 8
December 1941, ceased to do so the following day, and declared war
on Britain and the USA on 25 January 1942. It was rewarded by
Japan with territory in Malaya (1942) and Burma (1943), but
brought scant benefit to Japan in terms of industrial capacity or mili-
tary assistance.
Japan’s gains had been won at the cost of relatively few fatalities: a
total of about 15,000. Seizing and keeping the initiative had enabled
them to translate numerical inferiority into a more favourable posi-
tion at the point of engagement. The Japanese, however, suffered
from the lack of a realistic war plan. This, in part, arose from the
confusion in Japanese policymaking, with differences between mili-
tary and civilian populations, and between army and navy,
interacting with rifts over strategy. As with Hitler and both Britain
and the Soviet Union, a conviction of the weakness of the opposing
system led to a failure to judge resolve.The initial Japanese ability to
mount successful attacks, to gain great swathes of territory, and to
establish an apparent stranglehold on the Far East did not deter the
Americans from the long-term effort of driving back and destroying
their opponents. The American government and public were not
interested in the idea of a compromise peace with the power that
had attacked Pearl Harbor. Japan, the weaker power, had gone to war
with the one power that could beat her, and in a way most calcu-
lated to ensure that she did so. As Hector Bywater had predicted in
his novel The Great Pacific War: A History of the American–Japanese
Campaign of 1931–1933 (London and New York, 1925), despite
initial Japanese victories, the more powerful state finally won.
There were also serious deficiencies in particular areas of Japanese
doctrine, weaponry and military-industrial infrastructure. For
example, Japanese air power could not compete in the long term,
THE WAR WIDENS
102