Banner A. The Calculus Lifesaver: All the Tools You Need to Excel at Calculus
Подождите немного. Документ загружается.
176 • Exponentials and Logarithms
seems as if we can’t do much better than about 2.718, even if we compound
many many times a year. Our number e, which is the limit as n → ∞ of the
numbers in the second row of the above table, turns out to be an irrational
number whose decimal expansion begins like this:
e = 2.71828182845904523 . . .
It looks like there’s a pattern near the beginning, with the repeated string
“1828,” but that’s just a coincidence. In practice, just knowing that e is a
little over 2.7 will be more than enough.
Now if x = e
r
, then r = log
e
(x). It turns out that taking logs base
e is such a common thing to do that we can even write it a different way:
ln(x) instead of log
e
(x). The expression “ln(x)” is not pronounced “lin x” or
anything like that—just say “log x,” or perhaps “ell en x,” or if you’re feeling
particularly geeky, “the natural logarithm of x.” In fact, most mathematicians
write log(x) without a base to mean the same thing as log
e
(x) or ln(x). The
base e logarithm is called the natural logarithm. We’ll see one of the reasons
why it’s so natural when we differentiate log
b
(x) with respect to x in the next
section.
Since we have a new base e, and a new way of writing logarithms in that
base, let’s take another look at the log rules and formulas we’ve seen so far.
See if you can convince yourself that the following formulas are all true for
x > 0 and y > 0:
e
ln(x)
= x ln(e
x
) = x ln(1) = 0 ln(e) = 1
ln(xy) = ln(x) + ln(y) ln
x
y
= ln(x) − ln(y) ln(x
y
) = y ln(x)
(Actually, in the second formula, x can even be negative or 0, and in the last
formula, y can be negative or 0.) In any case, it’s really worth knowing these
formulas in this form, since we will almost always be working with natural
logarithms from now on.
One more point before we move on to differentiating logs and exponentials.
PSfrag
replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shado
w
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror
(y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y =
(x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same
height
−
x
Same
length,
opp
osite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y =
2
x
y =
10
x
y =
2
−x
y =
log
2
(x)
4
3
units
mirror
(x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
=
0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opp
osite
adjacen
t
0
(≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
I
I
I
II
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference
angle
reference
angle =
π
6
sin
+
sin −
cos
+
cos −
tan
+
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this
angle is
5π
6
clo
ckwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y =
sin(x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y =
sin(x)
y =
cos(x)
−
π
2
π
2
y =
tan(x), −
π
2
<
x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y =
tan(x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y =
sec(x)
y =
csc(x)
y =
cot(x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y =
tan
−1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
,
x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 <
x < 0.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x +
2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangen
t at x = a
b
tangen
t at x = b
c
tangen
t at x = c
y = x
2
tangen
t
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u +
∆u
v +
∆v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆u
∆v
u∆v
v∆u
∆u∆v
y = f(x)
1
2
−2
y = |x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −2x + 5
y = g(x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f (x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
Suppose you take the important limit
lim
n→∞
1 +
r
n
n
= e
r
,
and this time substitute h = 1/n. As we noticed in the previous section, when
n → ∞, we have h → 0
+
. So, replacing n by 1/h, we get
lim
h→0
+
(1 + rh)
1/h
= e
r
.
This is a right-hand limit. In fact, you can replace h → 0
+
by h → 0 and the
two-sided limit is still true. All we need to show is that the left-hand limit is
e
r
, and then, since both the left-hand and right-hand limits are the same, the
two-sided limit equals e
r
as well. So consider
lim
h→0
−
(1 + rh)
1/h
= ?
Section 9.3: Differentiation of Logs and Exponentials • 177
Replace h by −t; then t → 0
+
as h → 0
−
. (When h is a small negative
number, t = −h is a small positive number.) So
lim
h→0
−
(1 + rh)
1/h
= lim
t→0
+
(1 − rt)
−1/t
.
Since A
−1
= 1/A for any A 6= 0, we can rewrite the limit as
lim
t→0
+
1
(1 + (−r)t)
1/t
.
The denominator is just the classic limit but with interest rate −r instead of
r. This means that in the limit as t → 0
+
, the denominator goes to e
−r
. So
altogether we have
lim
h→0
−
(1 + rh)
1/h
= lim
t→0
+
(1 − rt)
−1/t
= lim
t→0
+
1
(1 + (−r)t)
1/t
=
1
e
−r
= e
r
.
The last step works because e
−r
= 1/e
r
. So we have shown what we want
to show. Let’s change r to x in all our formulas (why not?) and summarize
what we’ve found:
lim
n→∞
1 +
x
n
n
= e
x
and lim
h→0
(1 + xh)
1/h
= e
x
.
When x = 1, we get two formulas for e:
lim
n→∞
1 +
1
n
n
= e and lim
h→0
(1 + h)
1/h
= e.
These are important! We’ll look at some examples at how to use them in
Section 9.4.1 below. We’ll also use one of them to differentiate the log function,
right now.
9.3 Differentiation of Logs and Exponentials
Now the plot thickens. Let g(x) = log
b
(x). What is the derivative of g? Using
the definition,
g
0
(x) = lim
h→0
g(x + h) − g(x)
h
= lim
h→0
log
b
(x + h) − log
b
(x)
h
.
How do we simplify this mess? We use the log rules, of course! First, use rule
#4 from Section 9.1.4 above to turn the difference of logs into the log of the
quotient:
g
0
(x) = lim
h→0
1
h
log
b
x + h
x
.
We can simplify the fraction down to (1 + h/x), but we also need to use log
rule #5 to pull the factor 1/h up to be an exponent. So
g
0
(x) = lim
h→0
log
b
1 +
h
x
1/h
.
178 • Exponentials and Logarithms
Forget about the log
b
for the moment. What happens to
1 +
h
x
1/h
as h goes to 0? That is, what is
lim
h→0
1 +
h
x
1/h
?
In the previous section, we saw that
lim
h→0
(1 + hr)
1/h
= e
r
;
so if we replace r by 1/x, then this leads to
lim
h→0
1 +
h
x
1/h
= e
1/x
.
So, if we go back to our expression for g
0
(x), we see that
g
0
(x) = lim
h→0
log
b
1 +
h
x
1/h
= log
b
(e
1/x
).
In fact we can even make the expression simpler by using log rule #5 again—
the power 1/x comes down out front and we have shown that
d
dx
log
b
(x) =
1
x
log
b
(e).
Now, let’s set b = e, so that we are taking the derivative of the log function
of base e. We get
d
dx
log
e
(x) =
1
x
log
e
(e).
But wait a second—by log rule #2, log
e
(e) is simply equal to 1. So this means
that
d
dx
log
e
(x) =
1
x
.
That’s pretty nice. It’s actually really really nice. Kind of amazing, really.
Who would have thought that the derivative of log
e
(x) is just 1/x? This is
one of the reasons why the logarithm base e is called the natural logarithm.
Writing log
e
(x) as ln(x) (we made this definition in the previous section), we
get the important formula
d
dx
ln(x) =
1
x
.
Also, the above expression
1
x
log
b
(e) for the derivative of log
b
(x) can be written
in terms of natural logarithms by using the change of base formula (that’s #6
in Section 9.1.4 above). You see, by changing to base e, we get
log
b
(e) =
log
e
(e)
log
e
(b)
=
1
ln(b)
.
Section 9.3.1: Examples of differentiating exponentials and logs • 179
So we have
d
dx
log
b
(x) =
1
x ln(b)
.
This is the nicest way to express the derivative of a logarithm of a base other
than e. Now watch this: if y = b
x
, then we know that x = log
b
(y). Now
differentiate with respect to y; using the above formula with x replaced by y,
we get
dx
dy
=
1
y ln(b)
.
By the chain rule, we can flip both sides to get
dy
dx
= y ln(b).
Since y = b
x
, we have proved the nice formula
d
dx
(b
x
) = b
x
ln(b).
In particular, if b = e, then ln(b) = ln(e) = 1. (That is just log rule #1 in
disguise—remember, ln(e) = log
e
(e) = 1.) So if b = e, this formula becomes
d
dx
(e
x
) = e
x
.
This is a pretty freaky formula. If h(x) = e
x
, then h
0
(x) = e
x
as well—the
function h is its own derivative! Of course, the second derivative of e
x
(with
respect to x) is also e
x
, as are the third derivative, the fourth derivative, and
so on.
9.3.1 Examples of differentiating exponentials and logs
Now let’s look at how to apply some of the above formulas. First, if y = e
−3x
,
what is dy/dx? Well, if u = −3x, then y = e
u
. We have
PSfrag
replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shado
w
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror
(y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y =
(x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same
height
−
x
Same
length,
opp
osite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y =
2
x
y =
10
x
y =
2
−x
y =
log
2
(x)
4
3
units
mirror
(x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
=
0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opp
osite
adjacen
t
0
(≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
I
I
I
II
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference
angle
reference
angle =
π
6
sin
+
sin −
cos
+
cos −
tan
+
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this
angle is
5π
6
clo
ckwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y =
sin(x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y =
sin(x)
y =
cos(x)
−
π
2
π
2
y =
tan(x), −
π
2
<
x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y =
tan(x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y =
sec(x)
y =
csc(x)
y =
cot(x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y =
tan
−1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
,
x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 <
x < 0.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x +
2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangen
t at x = a
b
tangen
t at x = b
c
tangen
t at x = c
y = x
2
tangen
t
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u +
∆u
v +
∆v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆u
∆v
u∆v
v∆u
∆u∆v
y = f(x)
1
2
−2
y = |x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −2x + 5
y = g(x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f (x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
dy
du
=
d
du
(e
u
) = e
u
and
du
dx
=
d
dx
(−3x) = −3.
By the chain rule,
dy
dx
=
dy
du
du
dx
= e
u
(−3) = −3e
−3x
;
notice that we replaced u by −3x in the last step. In fact, this is a special
case of a nice rule: if a is constant, then
d
dx
e
ax
= ae
ax
.
This formula can be proved in the same way by letting u = ax. In fact,
it’s exactly the same as the principle we saw at the end of Section 7.2.1 in
Chapter 7: if x is replaced by ax, then there is an extra factor of
180 • Exponentials and Logarithms
a out front when you differentiate. So it should be no problem, for
example, to differentiate ln(8x) with respect to x. In fact,
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u + ∆
u
v + ∆
v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆
u
∆
v
u
∆v
v∆
u
∆
u∆v
y = f(
x)
1
2
−
2
y = |
x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −
2x + 5
y = g(
x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
y = f (
x)
3
−
3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
d
dx
(ln(8x)) = 8 ×
1
8x
,
since the derivative of ln(x) with respect to x is 1/x. Now, the factors of 8
cancel and we see that
d
dx
(ln(8x)) = 8 ×
1
8x
=
1
x
.
That’s weird—the derivative of ln(8x) is the same as the derivative of ln(x)!
Not so weird when you think about it: ln(8x) = ln(8) + ln(x), so in fact the
quantities ln(8x) and ln(x) just differ by a constant and therefore have the
same derivative with respect to x.
Here’s a harder example:
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u + ∆
u
v + ∆
v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆
u
∆
v
u
∆v
v∆
u
∆
u∆v
y = f(
x)
1
2
−
2
y = |
x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −
2x + 5
y = g(
x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f (x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
if y = e
x
2
log
3
(5
x
− sin(x)), what is
dy
dx
?
Let’s use the product rule and the chain rule. Start off by setting u = e
x
2
and
v = log
3
(5
x
−sin(x)), so y = uv. For the product rule, we need to differentiate
u and v (with respect to x), so let’s do them one at a time. Starting with
u = e
x
2
, let t = x
2
so that u = e
t
; then, using the chain rule, we have
du
dx
=
du
dt
dt
dx
= e
t
(2x) = 2xe
x
2
.
As for v, let s = 5
x
− sin(x) so that v = log
3
(s). By the chain rule,
dv
dx
=
dv
ds
ds
dx
=
1
s ln(3)
(5
x
ln(5) − cos(x)) =
5
x
ln(5) − cos(x)
ln(3)(5
x
− sin(x))
.
Here we’ve used the formulas from the previous section for the derivatives of
log
b
(x) (with b = 3) and b
x
(with b now equal to 5). Anyway, since y = uv,
we have
dy
dx
= v
du
dx
+ u
dv
dx
= log
3
(5
x
− sin(x))2xe
x
2
+ e
x
2
5
x
ln(5) − cos(x)
ln(3)(5
x
− sin(x))
.
As usual, it’s a bit of mess, but the example does illustrate the main points
involved; as long as you know the basic formulas for differentiating exponen-
tials and logs (they are the boxed equations in the previous section), then
you’ll be all set.
9.4 How to Solve Limit Problems Involving
Exponentials or Logs
Now it’s time to see how to solve a bunch of limit problems. As in the case of
all the previous limits we’ve looked at, it’s really important to note whether
you are evaluating functions near 0 (that is, at small arguments), near ∞ or
−∞ (large arguments), or somewhere else that’s neither small nor large. We’ll
examine some of these cases in some detail with respect to exponentials and
logarithms. Let’s start off, though, with limits involving the definition of e.
Section 9.4.1: Limits involving the definition of e • 181
9.4.1 Limits involving the definition of e
Consider the following limit:
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u + ∆
u
v + ∆
v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆
u
∆
v
u
∆v
v∆
u
∆
u∆v
y = f(
x)
1
2
−
2
y = |
x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −
2x + 5
y = g(
x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
y = f (
x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
lim
h→0
(1 + 3h
2
)
1/3h
2
.
It looks pretty similar to the limit involving e from Section 9.2.3 above:
lim
h→0
(1 + h)
1/h
= e.
If we take this limit, and replace h by 3h
2
everywhere we see it, then we get
lim
3h
2
→0
(1 + 3h
2
)
1/3h
2
= e.
This is almost exactly what we want. All we have to do is note that 3h
2
→ 0
as h → 0, so
lim
h→0
(1 + 3h
2
)
1/3h
2
= e.
Using the same logic, we can show (for example) that
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u + ∆
u
v + ∆
v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆
u
∆
v
u
∆v
v∆
u
∆
u∆v
y = f(
x)
1
2
−
2
y = |
x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −
2x + 5
y = g(
x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f (x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
lim
h→0
(1 + sin(h))
1/ sin(h)
= e.
Indeed, if you replace h by any quantity that goes to 0 as h → 0, such as 3h
2
or sin(h), then the limit is still e. So how about
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u + ∆
u
v + ∆
v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆
u
∆
v
u
∆v
v∆
u
∆
u∆v
y = f(
x)
1
2
−
2
y = |
x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −2x + 5
y = g(x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f (x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
lim
h→0
(1 + cos(h))
1/ cos(h)
?
You can’t just repeat the previous argument, since cos(h) → 1 as h → 0. In
fact, if you just substitute h = 0 into the expression (1 + cos(h))
1/ cos(h)
then
you get (1 + 1)
1
= 2, so the above limit is in fact equal to 2.
Now consider
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u + ∆
u
v + ∆
v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆
u
∆
v
u
∆v
v∆
u
∆
u∆v
y = f(x)
1
2
−2
y = |x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −2x + 5
y = g(x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f (x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
lim
h→0
(1 + h
2
)
1/3h
2
.
There is a mismatch between an h
2
term and a 3h
2
term. They are similar,
but the coefficients aren’t the same. We need to write the exponent 1/3h
2
as
(1/h
2
) × (1/3) and use an exponential rule:
lim
h→0
(1 + h
2
)
1/3h
2
= lim
h→0
(1 + h
2
)
(1/h
2
)×(1/3)
= lim
h→0
(1 + h
2
)
1/h
2
1/3
.
Since the h
2
terms match up, the part inside the big parentheses goes to e,
and the whole limit is therefore e
1/3
.
Here’s a slightly harder example: what is the value of
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u + ∆u
v + ∆v
(u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆u
∆v
u∆v
v∆u
∆u∆v
y = f(x)
1
2
−2
y = |x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −2x + 5
y = g(x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f (x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
lim
h→0
(1 − 5h
3
)
2/h
3
?
It’s annoying, but the small quantities −5h
3
and h
3
don’t quite match, and
there’s also that 2. We need to match them up by fiddling with the exponent
2/h
3
to match the −5h
3
term. The best way to look at it is to see how nice
everything would be if we instead wanted to find
lim
h→0
(1 − 5h
3
)
1/(−5h
3
)
,
182 • Exponentials and Logarithms
because this limit is just e. Yup, the −5h
3
terms match and so this is nothing
more than our classic limit
lim
h→0
(1 + h)
1/h
= e,
with h replaced by −5h
3
. Unfortunately, we have to do a little more work.
Somehow we need to turn 1/(−5h
3
) into 2/h
3
. To do that, we have to multiply
by −5 to get rid of the −5 in the denominator, and then multiply again by
2 to fix up the numerator. The overall effect is that we should multiply by
−10. So, we have
lim
h→0
(1 − 5h
3
)
2/h
3
= lim
h→0
(1 − 5h
3
)
(1/(−5h
3
))×(−10)
= lim
h→0
(1 − 5h
3
)
1/(−5h
3
)
−10
= e
−10
.
9.4.2 Behavior of exponentials near 0
We’d like to understand how e
x
behaves when x is really close to 0. In fact,
since e
0
= 1, we know that
lim
x→0
e
x
= e
0
= 1.
Of course, you can replace x by another quantity that goes to 0 when x → 0
and get the same limit. For example,
lim
x→0
e
x
2
= e
0
2
= 1
as well. So, we can find
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u + ∆
u
v + ∆
v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆
u
∆
v
u
∆v
v∆
u
∆u∆v
y = f(x)
1
2
−2
y = |x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −2x + 5
y = g(x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f (x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
lim
x→0
e
x
2
sin(x)
x
by splitting up like this:
lim
x→0
e
x
2
sin(x)
x
= lim
x→0
e
x
2
sin(x)
x
.
Both factors tend to 1 as x → 0, so the overall limit is 1 ×1 = 1. Now, here’s
a trickier example:
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u + ∆u
v + ∆v
(u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆u
∆v
u∆v
v∆u
∆u∆v
y = f(x)
1
2
−2
y = |x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −2x + 5
y = g(x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f (x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
lim
x→∞
2x
2
+ 3x − 1
e
1/x
(x
2
− 7)
.
As x gets very large, 1/x gets very close to 0; so e
1/x
is very close to 1 and
can be ignored. Your best bet is to write the limit as
lim
x→∞
1
e
1/x
×
2x
2
+ 3x − 1
x
2
− 7
.
The first fraction goes to 1, and using the techniques from Section 4.3 of
Chapter 4, you can show that the second factor goes to 2; so the limit is 2.
Section 9.4.3: Behavior of logarithms near 1 • 183
This sort of approach works well if your exponential term appears in a
product or a quotient, but it fails miserably with something like this:
lim
h→0
e
h
− 1
h
.
It’s tempting to replace the e
h
by 1, which is fair enough, except that you
get a useless 0/0 case. The problem is that we have a difference between e
h
and 1, which gets very small when h is near 0. So what do we do? As we
saw in Section 6.5 in Chapter 6, when the dummy variable is by itself on the
bottom, your limit might be a derivative in disguise. Try setting f(x) = e
x
,
so that f
0
(x) = e
x
as well (as we saw in Section 9.3 above). In this case, the
standard formula
lim
h→0
f(x + h) − f(x)
h
= f
0
(x)
becomes
lim
h→0
e
x+h
− e
x
h
= e
x
.
Now all we need to do is replace x by 0. Since e
0
= 1, we get the useful fact
that
lim
h→0
e
h
− 1
h
= 1.
Once again, you can replace h by any small quantity. For example,
lim
s→0
e
3s
5
− 1
s
5
= lim
s→0
e
3s
5
− 1
3s
5
× 3 = 1 × 3 = 3.
The standard matching trick works; this is really the same trick we used
in poly-type limits (Chapter 4), trig limits where the arguments are small
(Chapter 7), and the limits in Section 9.4.1 above.
9.4.3 Behavior of logarithms near 1
Now let’s look at how logs behave near 1. It turns out that the situation is
pretty similar to the case of exponentials near 0. We know that ln(1) = 0,
but what is
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u + ∆
u
v + ∆
v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆u
∆v
u∆v
v∆u
∆u∆v
y = f(x)
1
2
−2
y = |x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −2x + 5
y = g(x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f (x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
lim
h→0
ln(1 + h)
h
?
Believe it or not, this is another example of a limit which is a derivative
in disguise (see Section 6.5 in Chapter 6). Set f (x) = ln(x) and note that
f
0
(x) = 1/x, as we saw in Section 9.3. Now the equation
lim
h→0
f(x + h) − f(x)
h
= f
0
(x)
becomes
lim
h→0
ln(x + h) − ln(x)
h
=
1
x
for any x. All that’s left is to put x = 1 and get
lim
h→0
ln(1 + h) − ln(1)
h
=
1
1
.
184 • Exponentials and Logarithms
Since ln(1) = 0, this simplifies to
lim
h→0
ln(1 + h)
h
= 1.
Once again, h can be replaced by any quantity which goes to 0 as h → 0 and
the limit will still be 1. For example, to find
lim
h→0
ln(1 − 7h
2
)
5h
2
,
you have to mess with the denominator to make it look like −7h
2
as follows:
lim
h→0
ln(1 − 7h
2
)
5h
2
= lim
h→0
ln(1 − 7h
2
)
−7h
2
×
−7h
2
5h
2
.
It’s just our old trick of multiplying and dividing by a useful quantity (−7h
2
in this case). Anyway, the first fraction has limit 1 since the small quantity
−7h
2
matches, and the second fraction just cancels down to be −7/5. So the
limit is −7/5.
9.4.4 Behavior of exponentials near ∞ or −∞
Now we want to understand what happens to e
x
when x → ∞ or x → −∞.
Let’s take another look at the graph of y = e
x
:
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f(
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u + ∆
u
v + ∆
v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆
u
∆
v
u
∆v
v∆
u
∆
u∆v
y = f(
x)
1
2
−
2
y = |
x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −2x + 5
y = g(x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f(x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
y = e
x
5
10
1
2 3 4
0
−1−2−3−4
Beware: the curve above looks as if it touches the x-axis at the left side of
the graph, but it doesn’t; remember, e
x
> 0 for all x, so there are no x-
intercepts. (This is a good argument against relying too strongly on graphing
calculators in order to understand what’s going on!) In any case, it seems
that we should at least have
lim
x→∞
e
x
= ∞ and lim
x→−∞
e
x
= 0.
What if the base e is replaced by some other base? For example, consider
PSfrag replacements
(
a, b)
[
a, b]
(
a, b]
[
a, b)
(
a, ∞)
[
a, ∞)
(
−∞, b)
(
−∞, b]
(
−∞, ∞)
{
x : a < x < b}
{
x : a ≤ x ≤ b}
{
x : a < x ≤ b}
{
x : a ≤ x < b}
{
x : x ≥ a}
{
x : x > a}
{
x : x ≤ b}
{
x : x < b}
R
a
b
shadow
0
1
4
−
2
3
−
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
g(
x) = x
2
f(
x) = x
3
mirror (
y = x)
f
−
1
(x) =
3
√
x
y = h
(x)
y = h
−
1
(x)
y = (
x − 1)
2
−
1
x
Same height
−
x
Same length,
opposite signs
y = −
2x
−
2
1
y =
1
2
x − 1
2
−
1
y = 2
x
y = 10
x
y = 2
−
x
y = log
2
(
x)
4
3 units
mirror (
x-axis)
y = |
x|
y = |
log
2
(x)|
θ radians
θ units
30
◦
=
π
6
45
◦
=
π
4
60
◦
=
π
3
120
◦
=
2
π
3
135
◦
=
3
π
4
150
◦
=
5
π
6
90
◦
=
π
2
180
◦
= π
210
◦
=
7
π
6
225
◦
=
5
π
4
240
◦
=
4
π
3
270
◦
=
3
π
2
300
◦
=
5
π
3
315
◦
=
7
π
4
330
◦
=
11
π
6
0
◦
= 0 radians
θ
hypotenuse
opposite
adjacent
0 (
≡ 2π)
π
2
π
3
π
2
I
II
III
IV
θ
(
x, y)
x
y
r
7
π
6
reference angle
reference angle =
π
6
sin +
sin −
cos +
cos −
tan +
tan −
A
S
T
C
7
π
4
9
π
13
5
π
6
(this angle is
5
π
6
clockwise)
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
0
−
1
−
2
−
3
−
4
−
5
−
6
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
1
0
−
1
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
2π
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
2
π
3
π
2
π
π
2
y = sin(
x)
y = cos(
x)
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x), −
π
2
< x <
π
2
0
−
π
2
π
2
y = tan(
x)
−
2π
−
3π
−
5
π
2
−
3
π
2
−
π
−
π
2
π
2
3
π
3
π
5
π
2
2
π
3
π
2
π
y = sec(
x)
y = csc(
x)
y = cot(
x)
y = f(
x)
−
1
1
2
y = g(
x)
3
y = h
(x)
4
5
−
2
f(
x) =
1
x
g(
x) =
1
x
2
etc.
0
1
π
1
2
π
1
3
π
1
4
π
1
5
π
1
6
π
1
7
π
g(
x) = sin
1
x
1
0
−
1
L
10
100
200
y =
π
2
y = −
π
2
y = tan
−
1
(x)
π
2
π
y =
sin(
x)
x
, x > 3
0
1
−
1
a
L
f(
x) = x sin (1/x)
(0 < x < 0
.3)
h
(x) = x
g(
x) = −x
a
L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
+
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) DNE
M
}
lim
x
→a
−
f(x) = M
lim
x
→a
f(x) = L
lim
x
→a
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = L
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = ∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) = −∞
lim
x
→−∞
f(x) DNE
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
+
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
−
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = ∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) = −∞
lim
x →a
f(
x) DNE
y = f (
x)
a
y =
|
x|
x
1
−
1
y =
|
x + 2|
x + 2
1
−
1
−
2
1
2
3
4
a
a
b
y = x sin
1
x
y = x
y = −
x
a
b
c
d
C
a
b
c
d
−
1
0
1
2
3
time
y
t
u
(
t, f(t))
(
u, f(u))
time
y
t
u
y
x
(
x, f(x))
y = |
x|
(
z, f(z))
z
y = f(
x)
a
tangent at x = a
b
tangent at x = b
c
tangent at x = c
y = x
2
tangent
at x = −
1
u
v
uv
u + ∆
u
v + ∆
v
(
u + ∆u)(v + ∆v)
∆u
∆v
u∆v
v∆u
∆u∆v
y = f(x)
1
2
−2
y = |x
2
− 4|
y = x
2
− 4
y = −2x + 5
y = g(x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
−5
−6
y = f (x)
3
−3
3
−3
0
−1
2
easy
hard
flat
y = f
0
(x)
3
−3
0
−1
2
1
−1
y = sin(x)
y = x
x
A
B
O
1
C
D
sin(x)
tan(x)
y =
sin(x)
x
π
2π
1
−1
x = 0
a = 0
x > 0
a > 0
x < 0
a < 0
rest position
+
−
y = x
2
sin
1
x
N
A
B
H
a
b
c
O
H
A
B
C
D
h
r
R
θ
1000
2000
α
β
p
h
y = g(x) = log
b
(x)
y = f(x) = b
x
y = e
x
5
10
1
2
3
4
0
−1
−2
−3
−4
lim
x→∞
2
x
and lim
x→∞
1
3
x
.
Section 9.4.4: Behavior of exponentials near ∞ or −∞ • 185
To handle the first one, let’s use the identity A = e
ln(A)
with A = 2
x
to write
2
x
= e
ln(2
x
)
= e
x ln(2)
.
Now as x → ∞, we also have x ln(2) → ∞, so the first limit is ∞. As for the
second limit, this time we can use the same trick to write
1
3
x
=
1
3
x
=
1
e
x ln(3)
.
As x → ∞, we see that e
x ln(3)
→ ∞, so the reciprocal goes to 0. We have
proved that
lim
x→∞
2
x
= ∞ and lim
x→∞
1
3
x
= 0.
These are special cases of the following important limit:
lim
x→∞
r
x
=
∞ if r > 1,
1 if r = 1,
0 if 0 ≤ r < 1.
The middle case, when r = 1, is obvious, since 1
x
= 1 for all x ≥ 0. The other
two cases can be shown in the same way as we handled the limits of 2
x
and
(1/3)
x
above—just write r
x
as e
x ln(r)
.
This is not the whole story. The limit
lim
x→∞
e
x
= ∞
says that e
x
gets larger and larger—as large as you want—when x gets larger;
but how fast does this happen? After all,
lim
x→∞
x
2
= ∞
as well. Which one grows faster, x
2
or e
x
? The answer is that e
x
kicks butt
over x
2
when x is large. After all, when x = 100, the quantity x
2
is only
100 × 100, while
e
100
= e × e × ··· × e.
There are a hundred factors of e but only two factors of 100, so e
100
is much
bigger than 100
2
. The situation is even more in favor of e
x
when x is larger
still. Since e
x
is so much bigger than x
2
, when you divide x
2
by e
x
you should
get a tiny number. In fact,
lim
x→∞
x
2
e
x
= 0.
We won’t prove this until we look at l’Hˆopital’s Rule in Chapter 14. For the
moment, I want to point out that the above limit is also true if you replace
x
2
by any power of x. Even x
999
can’t compete with e
x
. When x is a billion,
x
999
is 999 copies of a billion, multiplied together—but e
x
is a billion copies
of e, multiplied together! Even though e is a lot smaller than a billion, e
x
just