effects on the quality and purity of water, and
on the organisms that live in water. Left pol-
luted, biota will either change in structure and
species, or will perish.
Water-powered car Genepax, a Japanese
company, unveiled in 2008 an eco-friendly car
prototype that is claimed to run solely on any
kind of water—even seawater or tea. With just 1
litre of water, the car is said to be able to run for
up to an hour, at a speed of 80 km/h (50 mph).
Typical fuel cell vehicles take in hydrogen and
emit water, but Genepax’s car generates elec-
tricity by breaking down water into hydrogen
and oxygen. The company reported that this is
made possible by a technology called “mem-
brane electrode assembly”, which contains a
material that is capable of breaking down water
into hydrogen and oxygen through a chemical
reaction. According to Genepax, it does not
require batteries to be recharged, as is the case
for most electric cars. Skeptics have questioned
the car’s legitimacy, claiming that the technol-
ogy appears to violate the first law of thermo-
dynamics. Genepax is reportedly filing a patent
for its new technology.
Water rights, laws governing Modern legal
governance of access to water and water use
has become a paramount issue because of the
exponential increase in demand for water
caused by increased populations, climate chan-
ges, development of bigger urban areas, rapid
economic development worldwide, and more
industrialization and commercial manufactur-
ing. All these socioeconomic factors intensify
worldwide pressures on water resources and
supplies, and require a more orderly manage-
ment and regulation of water resources and
water rights to replace the semi-laissez-faire
practices established in the 19th century.
Water rights are defined as the legal right to
abstract and use water from a natural source,
such as a river, stream, or aquifer. The laws
governing water rights depend on a country’s
legal structure, geographical, socioeconomic, and
political circumstances. Based on the unique
situation of each political jurisdiction and
country, it is impossible to have one legal fra-
mework for water rights. No one law would fit
all the cultural, hydrogeological, economic, and
social conditions in the world. In some coun-
tries, such as Spain and Chile, water is owned
nationally to ensure access by all citizens and to
protect the purity of the water. In some states in
the USA, water is considered public property
and cannot be owned privately. In England, and
the New England area of the USA, riparian
rights have been the prevailing practice since
the 19th century, and the right to abstract and
use water from a stream, river, or lake was an
integral part of the right of ownership of that
parcel of land. In the western USA during the
19th century, the practice of prior appropriation
prevailed and severed the link between land
and water rights. Prior appropriation was based
on the practice and right of “first come, first
use”. However, The Dublin Principles, estab-
lished as part of the 1992 United Nations Rio
Declaration, declared that water development
and management should involve users, plan-
ners, and policy-makers at all levels; and water
sources, availability, and purity should be safe-
guarded. To achieve these goals, conservation
organizations, government bodies, and interna-
tional groups such as United Nations agree that
the traditional land-based approach to water
rights, including the rights to groundwater, is no
longer a sound basis for sustainable manage-
ment and use of water resources. Some groups
have
proposed
state ownership of all water;
others have proposed capping the volume
abstracted by water rights-holders; all propose
regulations to provide equity, transparency, and
minimum negative impacts on the environment
and third parties. Most agree that water rights-
holders should be guaranteed some security,
but bear the responsibility of limiting their use
256 Water-powered car