consequence that would also proceed from the
on-board re-forming of methanol into hydrogen.
Studies comparing the environmental con-
sequences of hydrogen production and use in
fuel-cell vehicles with the refining of petroleum
and combustion in conventional automobile
engines have found a net reduction of ozone
and greenhouse gases in favor of hydrogen.
Hydrogen production using renewable energy
resources would not create such emissions or,
in the case of biomass, would create near-zero
net emissions.
In addition to the inherent losses of energy in
the conversion of feedstock to produce hydrogen,
which makes hydrogen less advantageous as an
energy carrier, there are economic and energy
penalties associated with packaging, distribution,
storage, and transfer of hydrogen.
Researchers in the area of artificial photo-
synthesis are trying to replicate the process of
splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen using
sunlight energy. If successful, this process could
provide a source of hydrogen as a clean, non-
polluting fuel. The attraction of hydrogen is that
it produces no pollution or greenhouse gases at
the tailpipe. Current methods of producing hydro-
gen from oil and coal produce substantial carbon
dioxide. Unless and until this carbon can be
captured and stored, renewable (wind or solar)
and nuclear power, with their attendant pro-
blems of supply and waste, are the only means
of producing hydrogen without also producing
greenhouse gases.
In addition, setting up a completely new
infrastructure to distribute hydrogen would cost
at least US$5,000 per vehicle. Transporting,
storing, and distributing a gaseous fuel, as
opposed to a liquid, raises many new problems.
It has been estimated that a substantial invest-
ment of many billion dollars will be needed to
develop hydrogen fuel cells that can match
the performance of today’s gasoline engines.
Researchers indicate that improvements to cur-
rent cars and current environmental rules are
more than 100 times cheaper than hydrogen
cars at reducing air pollution. And for several
decades, the most cost-effective method to
reduce oil imports and CO
2
emissions from cars
will be to increase fuel efficiency.
Buses, trains, PHB© bicycles, cargo bikes,
golf carts, motorcycles, wheelchairs, ships, air-
planes, submarines, high-speed cars, and rock-
ets already can run on hydrogen, in various
forms and sometimes at great expense. NASA
uses hydrogen to launch space shuttles. Some
airplane manufacturers are pursuing hydrogen
as fuel for airplanes. Unmanned hydrogen planes
have been tested, and in February 2008 Boeing
tested a manned flight of a small aircraft pow-
ered by a hydrogen fuel cell. Boeing reported
that hydrogen fuel cells were unlikely to power
the engines of larger passenger jets, but could
be used as backup or auxiliary power units
onboard. Rockets use hydrogen because it gives
the highest exhaust velocity as well as providing a
lower net weight of propellant than other fuels.
It is very effective in upper stages, although it
has also been used on lower stages, usually in
conjunction with a dense fuel booster.
The main disadvantage of hydrogen in this
application is its low density and deeply cryogenic
nature, requiring insulation—this makes the
hydrogen tankage relatively heavy, which greatly
offsets many of the otherwise overwhelming
advantages for this application. See also:
Artificial
photosynthesis
Hydrogen-rich fuel Fuel that contains a sig-
nificant amount of hydrogen, such as gasoline,
diesel fuel, methanol, ethanol, natural gas,
and coal.
Hydrological cycle Process of evaporation and
transport of vapor, condensation, precipitation,
and the flow of water from continents to
oceans. It is a major factor in determining climate
through its influence on surface vegetation,
clouds, snow and ice, and soil moisture. The
Hydrological cycle 129