334 louise a. hitchcock
visual cue referencing a deity, who sanctioned the authority of the
local political structure as embodied by the palace (Hitchcock 2007).
is constellation of features renders the western court at Gournia
distinct from those of the other palaces, and the small size of the asso-
ciated recess lends the location of the baetyl and its oering cupule the
appearance of a cult corner. In addition, its contextual relationship to
the building is not unlike the association of masseboth with gates as
mentioned above for Bethsaida and Tel Dan.
Kato Zakro, Palace, Small Dedicated Room
e second palace (ca. 1700–1490/1450 bce or MMIII/LMIA–LMIB)
at Kato Zakro on the eastern coast of Crete is organized around a
central court roughly 25% of the size of the larger palaces at Knossos,
Mallia, and Phaistos (Preziosi and Hitchcock 1999: 107). Its location,
unique water features, Linear A archive, processional road leading to
the harbor, and imports including copper ingots and elephant ivory
indicate its importance and have led archaeologists to assume that it
was built to facilitate trade with the Near East (Hitchcock 2000: 87–88;
94–97; Wiener 1987: 265). Another space that has attracted only mild
interest among Aegean scholars is a small, rectangular room, room
23, measuring 2.8 m × 2 m and appointed with two benches, a plaster
oor, and a drain. is entire constellation of features is interpreted by
Gesell (1985: 137) as a bench sanctuary and by Marinatos (1993: 101)
as a food preparation room for the dining hall located in the northern
wing of the palace. It is situated in the central part of the western wing,
between the small sunken room or lustral chamber, and archive room,
and in close proximity to the main gathering hall and storage area.
e nds, which include two piriform rhyta, two bronze plates with
lily design for a box, a grindstone, and cups decorated with double
axes (Platon 1985: 125), do not make a compelling case for a ritual
space. e small size of the room and distance from the dining hall
does not make a compelling case for a food preparation area either.
Barshinger (1988: 104) also accepted that room 23 was a bench sanc-
tuary based on its spatial centrality and proximity to the lustral basin,
while Hitchcock (2000: 54) observed that in terms of its form and size,
it could just as easily serve as a cupboard or a preparation area as the
nature of the nds do not suggest a shrine. e presence of plastered
surfaces, benches, a drain, and libation vessels in the form of rhyta are