28 DECEMBER 2010 INTERNATIONAL WATER POWER & DAM CONSTRUCTION
PLANNING AND PROJECTS
RAISING TILGATE
Improvements to Tilgate Dam include raising the existing earth
embankment dam to provide ood protection for a 1 in 1000-year
event. Key parameters, for both the existing and proposed dam, are
provided in Table 1
The proposed option is raising the dam crest on the downstream
face to effectively create a new dam. A downstream slope of 4H:1V
is adopted for ease of maintenance of the grass cover. Raising the
existing embankment by construction of a new portion of embank-
ment on the downstream side was selected to avoid disturbance to
the reservoir and existing upstream face and dam crest. ‘Raising’ only
commences on the downstream side of the existing crest path to mini-
mise the load imposed on the existing dam.
In order to provide added condence in the temporary stability of
the downstream face of the existing embankment it was determined
that the reservoir should be lowered by not less than 2m during the
construction period. Such a lowering could retain the existing factor
of safety against uplift at the downstream toe of the dam.
The design assumes that ll procured from within Tilgate Park
will be used as general ll for the majority of the embankment. The
ground investigation has indicated that the geology at the site is
interbedded mudstones, siltstones and ne sandstones which tend to
weather to silty clay and sandy silty clay with some gravel. These
materials are considered suitable for general ll and investigation into
their use as core material has been implemented as part of a value
engineering exercise.
The spillway to discharge extreme floods is an overtoppable
embankment spillway with grasscrete armour layer situated on the
right abutment and thence into the sherman’s car park. The spillway
should operate, in theory, only once every 1000 years and has been
designed to safely discharge the probable maximum ood.
A stilling basin has been provided to destroy the energy of high
velocity ow over the spillway to minimise the risk of damage for
oods in excess of 1 in 1000 years. This is a shallow depression at
the toe of the spillway, with a pipe to drain rainwater laterally into
the middle of the valley.
The control structure to attenuate ood ows whilst retaining
the existing normal reservoir level will be in the area of the existing
structures on the right abutment, with control provided by an orice
plate with an open area of 0.10m
2
. A right abutment outlet will be
provided to replace the existing 0.6m diameter outlet on a like for like
basis in its existing alignment. This allows the reservoir to be lowered
by about 1m in a day, for the top 1.5m
The results of the 2006 and 2009 ground investigations show that
the embankment comprises soft sandy silty clay overlying alluvium
and terrace deposits which in turn overlie Upper Tunbridge Wells
Sands (UTWS). The UTWS comprises interbedded mudstones and
siltstones with occasional sandstone beds. Excavatability of UTWS,
both in terms of potential borrow area, and foundations for outlet
structures on right abutment could be a key issue.
In addition, near the dam there are long standing seepages emerg-
ing at the toe of the dam, and artesian groundwater was encountered
in a borehole at the toe of the existing dam. To the east groundwater
levels rise above reservoir level in the valley side
Construction work at Tilgate dam started on site in May 2010 and
has a programmed completion for the end of May 2011. The princi-
pal contractor for the works is Morrison Construction Ltd.
FLOOD STORAGE
There are three other ood storage areas and a river restoration site,
which together with the works at Tilgate Lake, make up the Upper
Mole Flood Alleviation Scheme. Two of the ood storage areas,
Worth Farm and Ield, are greeneld sites on the Gatwick Stream
and River Mole, respectively. The third site, Clay’s Lake, near Pease
Pottage, is on a tributary of the Gatwick Stream and like Tilgate
Lake, is an existing lake and involves raising the existing embank-
ment dam. Construction at these sites is currently expected to begin in
March 2012 and be completed by September 2013. The ood storage
capacity at each location is shown in table 2.
The capacity of each of the ood storage sites has been optimised
based on current guidance for climate change impacts given by
the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).
As a consequence, a precautionary approach has been adopted in
the designs for Tilgate Lake, Clays Lake and Ield and an adaptive
approach for Worth Farm. The designer for the ood storage sites
is Jacobs.
Inevitably in a large scale project such as this one there will be
some loss of woodland and vegetation. To offset this loss, new trees
will be replanted and new wildlife habitats will also be created. The
Environment Agency is taking the opportunity of carrying out these
major works to implement over ve hectares of Biodiversity Action
Plan habitat, including the regeneration of wet woodlands which are
extremely rich in invertebrate life and support a very large number of
native species.
By Graham Piper, Upper FAS Project Executive, National
Capital Programme Management Service, Environment
Agency. www.environment-agency.gov.uk
Tilgate Lake
Tilgate Lake is an existing reservoir in Tilgate Park in south Crawley, situated
on a tributary of Gatwick Stream, which itself is a tributary of the River Mole,
joining just downstream of Gatwick Airport.
Tilgate Lake is believed to have been built as an ornamental lake, probably
around 1861 when the site was purchased and the mansion built. Inspections
under the Reservoirs Acts commenced in 1958, and it was acquired by Crawley
Borough Council in 1964. The current spillway and outlet were built in 1965,
whilst the toe drains and V-notch were installed in 1970. Following overtopping
in the 1968 oods, the spillway capacity was increased by raising the dam by
0.6m in 1970. The sheet piling along the upstream face was added in 1992.
The existing reservoir comes under the Reservoirs Act 1975, as being
designed to retain more than 25,000m
3
above ‘lowest natural ground level’.
After a reservoir safety inspection in 2007 various requirements were identied
and included that:
r5IFPWFSáPXDBQBDJUZCFNPEJàFEUPTBGFMZBDDPNNPEBUFUIFáPPE
and wave surcharge.
r"TFJTNJDTBGFUZFWBMVBUJPOJTSFRVJSFEXJUIJOàWFZFBST
r-FBLBHFUISPVHIUIFTQJMMXBZTUSVDUVSFUPCFTUFNNFE
r$SBDLJOHUPUIFDSFTUUPCFàMMFEXJUIBCJUVNJOPVTTFBMBOUPSTJNJMBS
Left: Ian Tomes (Flood Risk Manager, Thames Region of the Environment
Agency), Councillor Keith Blake, Stewart Wingate (CEO Gatwick Airport) and
Graham piper (Project lead Environment Agency)
Table 2: Flood storage capacity
Flood storage location Max. height (m) of
dam above river bed
Flood storage
capacity m
3
Worth Farm 7.0 230,000
Clays Lake 10.8 350,000
Ield 2.7 520,000
IWP& DC