and exposure of the electronic parts, see Figure 13.2, with the aim of
reducing both the complexity and time of local manufacture. This led to
a study prototype that consisted of unadorned electronic components
mounted on recycled board, see Figure 13.3. This design prompted a
reconsideration of the aims of product design and its potential links with
sustainability and localization, and it provides the basis for the design
explorations presented here.
The experimental designs shown in Figures 13.2 and 13.3 illustrate that
for an electronic circuit, such as a radio circuit, the forms of expression
given to the product can be highly diverse, from the conventional
enclosing case to the circuitry being revealed and providing aesthetic
interest. In general, however
, aesthetic variations are usually limited
to what might be referred to as the non-functioning or non-essential
components, while commonality lies in the circuitry, or functioning
components, at least until a particular technology is superseded. And,
as I suggested in the previous chapter, the purview of the industrial
designer is to define the particular, but highly variable forms of
expression of the non-functioning parts, while the engineer or scientist
develops the essential functionality. Admittedly this is something of a
generalization, but the history of industrial design shows it to be broadly
true, and perhaps especially in the fields of electrical and electronic
products. An oft-cited example of the work of the designer, from the
time when industrial design was emerging as a distinct discipline, is the
Gestetner duplicating machine. This product was restyled in the early
1930s by Raymond Loewy, the so-called father of industrial design.
4
Loewy’s contribution radically changed the outer appearance of the
product but the functioning parts remained the same as those in the
original version. Adrian Forty has said, ’Loewy described the design as a
”face-lift” job, in which he arrived at ”a form which enclosed everything
that could be enclosed”’.
5
Industrial design has generally continued
in this vein. Although new technologies, techniques and areas such
as ergonomics have expanded the discipline, the designer still creates
aesthetically pleasing enclosures for components that, if revealed, might
be considered unattractive, susceptible to damage or unsafe. And, as I
have said previously, this outer casing has become a tool for boosting
consumerism.
6
This continues to be the attitude within the product
design world; for example, the following is taken from a recent report of
the Industrial Designers Society of America:
153
book.indd 153 4/7/06 12:25:48