
1
1.
TIDAL SYSTEMS 205
Tidal systems are potentially more
sensitive to sea level change than
wave-dominated systems, because
tidal resonance, which favours tidal
sedimentation, is a sensitive function
of basin geometry. Basin geometry, in
turn, may be dramatically altered by
small changes in sea level. Thus, tide-
dominated conditions may be turned
on and off in a "geological instant"
because of sea level rise or fall.
Transgressive systems tracts
During a lowstand of sea level, river
valleys commonly become incised. With
the succeeding transgression, the lower
reaches of these valleys are flooded by
saltwater and experience tidal action.
These areas are termed estuaries. They
trap the sediment supplied by the rivets,
and consequently little sediment
reaches the shelf. As a result,
pre-ex-
isting material, including estuarine
facies which are abandoned on the
shelf as transgression continues, may
be eroded from the
seafloor by strong
tidal currents. The mud component
commonly moves offshore into deeper
water, while the sands are either trans-
ported onshore or left in place on the
Figure
19
Distribution of tidal sand ridges off Norfolk, England, in the southern North Sea.
Depths in fathoms (1 fathom
=
6 feet, or roughly
2
m). The ridges are 35-40 m high, with
their crests in 10-15 m of water. The steepest ridge flank
(5")
is on the northeastern side of
each ridge because the strongest tidal currents flow to the north. From Swift (1975) after
Houbolt (1968).
shelf as the water deepens.
Tide-dominated estuaries
The Cobequid Bay-Salmon River
system in the Bay of Fundy (Dalrymple
et
a/., 1990, 1991) shows the typical
facies of a tide-dominated estuary
(Figs. 22, 23). A similar situation is pre-
sented by the Ord River in Australia
(Wright et
a/., 1975) and the Severn
River, England (Allen, 1990). The pat-
terns of sedimentation in these estu-
aries, and differences between tide-
dominated and wave-dominated estu-
aries are discussed by Dalrymple et
a/.
(1 992). Wave-dominated estuaries are
described in Chapter 10. It is worth
noting that the morphological distinc-
tion between tide-dominated estuaries
and deltas is not well documented,
and that many so-called
tide-domi-
nated deltas (e.g., the Ord River) may
be better classified as estuaries (see
discussions in Chapters 1 and 9).
Tide-dominated estuaries receive
sediment both from the river at the
head of the estuary, and from the ad-
jacent shelf by tidal currents. As a
result, grain sizes are coarsest at the
mouth and head of the estuary. Unlike
wave-dominated estuaries, however,
no fine-grained lagoonal facies are
present, because tidal currents pene-
trate into the estuary much more
easily than waves do (Dalrymple
etal.,
1992). Consequently, the distinct tri-
partite facies distribution (sandy barrier
-
muddy lagoon
-
sandy bay-head
delta; see Chapter 10) of
wave-domi-
nated estuaries does not occur in tide-
dominated systems. Instead, tide-
dominated estuaries are bordered
by muddy tidal flats and marshes
because tidal currents are strongest in
the sandy channels that run along the
entire length of the estuary axis (Fig.
22). The axial sands are finest grained
and contain the greatest number of
mud drapes in the vicinity of the
tidal-
fluvial transition, where the suspended
sediment turbidity maximum is situated.
The most seaward, estuarine facies
consists of elongate sand bars
(Fig.
22) which are separated by ebb-domi-
nant and flood-dominant channels
(Dalrymple et
a/.,
1990). The bars are
covered by dunes of various types and
sizes, and the bar sediments are com-
posed primarily of cross bedded,
medium to coarse sand. Lateral shift-
ing of the bars produces an
upward-