
2
Mohandas K. Gandhi, Hind Swaraj (Indian Home Rule), 1938 reprint from original publication in 1909, p.
20, Chapter I: The Congress And Its Officials.
311
As I write in America, I must address the prevailing perception that the Civil Rights
Movement of the mid-1900s is reflective of Satyagraha. I trust that the readers will see that what
this movement sought and attained falls short of the more expansive scope of Satyagraha. There
are differing perceptions of what the Civil Rights Movement was, especially when you talk with
people who were involved in aspects of this movement ignored by mainstream media coverage.
Yet despite the diversity of perceptions, an honest analysis will show that the Civil Rights
Movement exempted major components of Satyagraha, most notably Swaraj. I share this point
not to criticize my predecessors, because even in their incomplete application of Satyagraha
there is much to be praised, particularly their courage and willingness to suffer and act against
injustice. And as I am someone who directly benefitted from the work of the Civil Rights
Movement, I share Gandhi’s sentiment that:
“It is a mark of wisdom not to kick away the very step from which
we have risen higher. The removal of a step from a staircase
brings down the whole of it. When, out of infancy, we grow into
youth, we do not despise infancy, but, on the contrary, we recall
with affection the days of our childhood. If after many years of
study, a teacher were to teach me something, and if I were to build
a little more on the foundation laid by that teacher, I would not, on
that account, be considered wiser than the teacher. He would
always command my respect.”
2
I acknowledge that the road that led to my personal discovery of Gandhi ran through my study of
the Civil Rights Movement. And for the participants of that movement, I hold great respect and
appreciation. But I also realize that movement did not adequately represent or embody the
complete expanse of Satyagraha. As I hope the readers have realized by now, an incomplete
practice of Satyagraha is not Satyagraha -- just as the standard of Truth requires that all things
true be completely true. (I’m reminded of a mystic saying that proclaims a statement that is 99%
true is a lie because Truth demands one hundred percent purity; but lies don’t mind being
partially true, especially since this helps them appear more valid.)
In the larger quest for Truth, human progression will at times fall short of fully
embracing (beneficent) lessons readily available; but in realizing this, the challenge becomes to