Stern R. Hegelian Metaphysics
Подождите немного. Документ загружается.
390 Bibliography
Wartenberg, Thomas E., ‘Hegel’s Idealism: The Logic of Conceptuality’, in Frederick C.
Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1993), 102–29.
Wempe, Ben, T. H. Green’s Theory of Positive Freedom: From Metaphysics to Political
Theory (Exeter: Imprint Academic, 2004).
Westphal, Kenneth R., ‘Can Pragmatic Realists argue Transcendentally?’ in John Shook
(ed.), Pragmatic Naturalism and Realism (Amherst, NY Prometheus, 2003), 151–75.
‘Hegel and Realism’, in John Shook and Joseph Margolis (eds.), A Companion to
Pragmatism (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006), 177–83.
‘Hegel’s Attitude Toward Jacobi in ‘‘The Third Attitude of Thought Toward
Objectivity’’ ’, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 27 (1989), 135–56.
Hegel’s Epistemological Realism (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989).
‘Hegel, Idealism, and Robert Pippin’, International Philosophical Quarterly,33
(1993), 263–72.
Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2004).
‘On Hegel’s Early Critique of Kant’s Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science’,
in Stephen Houlgate (ed.), Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature (Albany: SUNY Press,
1998), 137–66.
White, Alan, Absolute Knowledge: Hegel and the Problem of Metaphysics (Athens, Ohio:
Ohio University Press, 1983).
Wiggins, David, Sameness and Substance Renewed (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2001).
Williams, Michael, Groundless Belief: An Essay on the Possibility of Epistemology (Oxford:
Blackwell, 1977).
Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism (Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1996).
Williamson, Timothy, The Philosophy of Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008).
Winfield, Richard Dien, Overcoming Foundations: Studies in Systematic Philosophy (New
York: Columbia University Press, 1989).
Reason and Justice (Albany: SUNY Press, 1988).
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, On Certainty,trans.DenisPaulandG.E.M.Anscombe(Oxford:
Blackwell, 1969).
Wollheim, Richard, F. H. Bradley, 2nd edn. (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1969).
Wood, Allen, Hegel’s Ethical Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).
Index
Abbot, F. C. 250–1, 253, 255, 259–63, 264
n. 94, 265–6, 289–93
absolute 30, 34, 52, 54–6, 60, 61, 68, 118,
120, 123, 130, 133, 143, 172, 181, 221,
240 n. 3, 244, 273, 279, 304–5, 307–9,
334, 339
abstract universal 150 n. 24, 151–4, 156–7,
171, 303, 315, 354–5, 357, 358, 368–9
actuality [Wiklichkeit] 81–4, 88, 95, 97–113,
247–8, 251–2, 256–7,284–5, 325
Adorno, T. W. 70 n. 77, 349 n. 5, 363 n. 33,
363–4 n. 34
Allison, H. 16 n. 42, 22 n. 54
Alston, W. P. 181 n. 10, 197 n. 45
Ameriks, K. 2 n. 5, 3 2 n. 76, 45, 46, 49, 50
n. 19, 54, 57, 58, 59, 60, 75, 76
antinomies 11–12, 223
anti-realism 47, 51, 52, 53, 54, 57, 239
Apel, K-O. 252, 256, 266
Aristotle 3 n. 7, 6, 28, 29 n. 71, 36 n. 86, 37,
50, 59, 65, 157, 169, 171, 172 n. 83, 172
n. 84, 217, 247, 261, 267, 291, 330, 349,
363 n. 33, 365, 368
Armstrong, D. 25 n. 63
Audi, R. 182 n. 10
Avineri, S. 83 n. 7, 103–4 n. 54, 108 n. 54,
108 n. 63
Ayer, A. J. 202 n. 58
Baillie, J. B. 259 n. 78
Baldwin, T. 77–9
Bardili, C. G. 263 n. 91
Baugh, B. 363 n. 31
Baumgarten, A. G. 13 n. 34, 13 n. 35
Bedell, G. 133 n. 45
being, deduction from thought 36, 126,
129–35, 276, 281, 309–14; see also
explanation; idealism, panlogistic;
Platonism
being qua being 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17,
20, 31, 32, 34
Beiser, F. C. 23 n. 56, 30–2, 57 n. 39, 228
n. 51
Bell, D. 60–1
Bergson, H. 330–1, 332, 333, 340, 341 n. 44,
368–9
Bird,G.7, 11n.28
Blanshard, B. 174–5, 177, 188–9, 193–5,
204, 205
Boler, J. 272–3 , 293 n. 97, 324 n. 83
BonJour, L. 3 n. 8, 177, 179 n. 6, 183 n. 13,
190–1, 193–5, 201, 205
Bosanquet, B. 117, 118, 145, 147, 149–50,
160, 161 n. 55, 163–4, 172–3
Boucher, D. 129 n. 37
Bowie, A. 33 n. 79, 66 n. 65, 124 n. 15, 315
n. 55
Bradley, F. H. 35, 40–1, 77, 79, 118, 121,
131–4, 139–42, 145–7,151–2, 157–8
n. 46, 158, 159–60, 166–7 n. 67, 177,
179–88, 192–3, 202–3, 205, 243 n. 14,
259 n. 78, 327–41
Bradley, J. 123 n. 9, 128
Brandom, R. B. 209, 321 n. 72, 321 n. 73
Brent, J. 251 n. 51, 265 n. 96, 289 n. 84
Brinkmann, K. 3 n. 7
Bristow, W. 216 n. 15
British Hegelianism, see British Idealism
British Idealism 35–7, 117–23, 281 n. 55
Buchdahl, G. 24 n. 61
bundle theory of individuals 157, 174, 329,
347–50, 352, 353–4, 357, 359
Burbidge, J. 256 n. 68, 269–70, 275, 284,
286
Caird, E. 129–30, 135, 150 n. 24
Caird, J. 150 n. 24
Candlish, S. 143 n. 2
Cartesianism in epistemology 37, 50, 210–18,
220, 222–30, 232, 232–6
categories 3, 5–7, 10 n. 26, 34, 35, 40, 50, 64,
66, 105, 120, 129, 131, 136–8, 204, 216,
217, 223, 231, 240–6, 247, 248–51,
253–4, 260, 262, 270, 271, 279, 287,
290, 292, 300–2, 308, 324, 326, 333,
350
Clayton, M. 143 n. 2
coherentism 36, 177–205, 212, 289, 293
Coleridge, S. T. 337 n. 33
Concept [Begriff ] 34, 48, 66, 78, 153–8, 161,
165, 240 n. 3, 255 n. 65, 279, 305 n. 20,
308–9, 358, 369
concrete universal 36, 40–1, 143–76, 303,
345, 350–8, 362, 368–9; see also
conceptual realism
Collingwood, R. G. 7 n. 17, 150 n. 24, 174
n. 96
Collins, A. 8 n. 22, 55 n. 33
392 Index
conceptual realism 28, 34, 35, 36, 38, 39,
67–76, 170, 215, 245, 262–3, 267–8,
292–3
Cook, D. 210 n. 5
Cook Wilson, J. 146 n. 11
Copelston, F. C. 141
Cornell, D. 276–7 n. 3
Couturat, L. 15 n. 38
Craig, E. 149 n. 22, 327, 334–5, 337–9
Crossley, D. J. 192 n. 34, 201 n. 56
Dancy, J. 201 n. 54
Davidson, D. 177, 190–1, 193, 205
Delaney, C. F. 181 n. 10
Deleuze, G. 41, 299, 345, 362–9
Democritus 59, 65, 68, 70 n. 77, 261,
291
DePaul, M. R. 184 n. 15
Descartes, R. 211–12, 216–20, 223, 224,
226, 228, 233
determinism 309–11
deVries, W. 60
Dewey, J. 209, 213, 214, 215
di Giovanni, G. 256 n. 68
dogmatism 3, 213, 222–3
doubt 211–25, 232–3, 235
D’Oro, G. 7 n. 17
Doz, A. 3 n. 7
Dryer, D. 7 n. 20, 20 n. 50
Dulckeit. K. 297 n. 112
Dummett, M. 6, 8, 10 n. 26, 11 n. 28
Duns Scotus 246–7, 277, 281, 293–4, 313
D
¨
using, K. 3 n. 7
Eberhard, J. 13 n. 35, 17 n. 43
Ellis, B. 26 n. 64
Empedocles 59, 65, 261, 291
empiricism 4 n. 11, 5 n. 13, 28, 32 n. 78, 36,
38, 67, 68, 70, 72, 73, 75, 122, 129, 133,
169, 172, 203, 227, 275, 337; see also
radical empiricism; thought, and relation
to experience
Engels, F. 82 n. 3
essence 9, 25, 26, 34, 36 n. 86, 54, 58, 70,
78–9, 83, 89 n. 20, 103, 104–6, 110,
153, 154–5, 160, 163, 171, 241 n. 6, 258
n. 74, 264, 267 n. 103, 301 n. 4, 333,
349, 351, 353–6, 360, 363
deducing existence from 124, 125, 128,
132, 134, 136, 138; see also being,
deduction from thought
Ewing, A. C. 183 n. 13
experience 28, 36, 72, 74, 100, 135, 166, 172,
175, 193, 200, 203–4, 242, 244, 248,
252, 257, 275–6, 278, 285–9, 304,
318–9, 328–31, 335–6, 340; see also
thought, and relation to experience
explanation 60–1, 68–71, 124, 126, 131,
137–41, 274, 280–2, 313–4, 321, 325,
335–6, 349
Fackenheim,E.L. 84n.9
fallibilism 181–2, 185–7, 193, 196–200,
212, 214, 227 n. 46
Farrell, F. 46 n. 5
Ferrarin, A. 3 n. 7
Ferreira, P. 167 n. 67
Ferrier, J. F. 123
Feuerbach, L. 41, 123, 125 n. 20, 280–1,
345, 360–1
Fichte, J. G. 103 n. 50, 124, 217, 253
Findlay, J. N. 66 n. 65, 199, 120–1, 122,
128
finite 34, 54, 57–60, 62–8, 71, 72, 76, 118,
259–61, 264, 290
Firstness 40, 41, 241–2, 243, 245, 248–9,
250, 254, 255, 267, 270, 271, 272, 273,
274, 277, 279, 280, 282, 286, 297,
299–326
Fisch, M. 210 n. 5, 239 n. 2, 250 n. 51,
264–5, 269 n. 3, 289 n. 84, 299
n. 1
Flower, E. 198 n. 50
Forster, M. 23 n. 55, 24 n. 60, 223 n. 39
Forster, P. D. 265 n. 99
Foster, M. B. 146 n. 11
foundationalism 178, 179–83, 184, 186–7,
196, 211
Franco,P. 83n.7
Frank, M. 66 n. 65, 124 n. 15
freedom 6, 161, 163, 218, 317 n. 58
free thought 48, 90–1, 93, 217, 225–9,
234
Friedman, M. 24 n. 61, 25 n. 62
Fries, J. F. 83 n. 6, 87–8 n. 18, 94
Gadamer, H-G. 235 n. 72
Garve, C. 17 n. 43
Gassendi, P. 211
Geach, P. T. 121 n. 6, 174 n. 93, 174 n. 95
Geuss, R. 112 n. 74
God 12–13, 18, 30, 32, 33, 45, 50, 52, 53,
72, 79, 124–5, 229, 230, 288, 290, 315,
334–5, 337–8, 364
Goethe,J.W. 97n.30
Good,J.A. 210n.5
Goodman, N. 197 n. 47
Goudge, T. A. 37 n. 88, 325
Green, T. H 117, 118, 167–72
Grier, M. 12 n. 32, 15 n. 37
Index 393
Griffin, N. 118
Guyer, P. 24 n. 61, 28 n. 68, 126 n. 24, 283
n. 61
Haack, S. 40 n. 99, 197 n. 47, 198 n. 49,
199–200, 214 n. 14
Hacker, P. M. S. 6–7 n. 17, 10 n. 26, 47 n. 7
Hacking, I. 310
haecceity 41, 277, 281–2, 293–5, 313,
349–53, 357, 358, 361, 367
Hamilton, W. 123
Hanna, R. 265 n. 98
Hardimon, M. 81 n. 1, 83 n. 7, 84, 102, 110,
112 n. 74, 256–7 n. 70
Harman, G. 191 n. 33
Harris, E. E. 321
Harris, H. S. 46 n. 5, 269
Harris, W. T. 259 n. 78, 263–5
Hartmann, K. 119, 128, 312–3 n. 49
Hartnack, J. 316, 319
Hausman, C. 254
Haym, R. 82 n. 3, 92 n. 27, 124, 127 n. 27,
128
Hegel, G. W. F.
and Aristotle 3 n. 7, 28, 29 n. 71, 36 n. 86,
50, 59, 157, 247, 267, 365
and the British Idealists 36–7, 117–76 see
also Bosanquet,B.;Bradley,F.H.;
Green,T.H.;McTaggart.J.McT.E.;
Seth, Andrew
conception of absolute 3 0–4, 52, 54–6, 60,
61, 118–21, 123, 30, 133, 221, 240
n. 3, 244, 273, 279, 304–5, 307–9
conceptual realism of 26, 27, 28, 34, 35, 36,
67–76, 215, 245, 259–68, 292–3
and the concrete universal 36, 40, 41,
147–9, 152–8, 174, 175–6, 303,
308–9, 345, 350–8
and Doppelsatz 35, 81–114, 118
historicism of 83, 228
and holism 59–66, 152, 158, 162–3, 261,
272, 291–2, 308, 316–7, 320, 324
and Jacobi 67–72, 229, 288, 300, 315
andmetaphysics 1–34,46–54
and methods of inquiry 81–2, 90, 215–25,
234–7
and monism 64–5, 279, 283, 304, 307,
308, 309
andnominalism 38–9,239–68, 272–3,
302
non-metaphysical readings of 1, 36,
117–42, 144, 281, 312
political views of 81–5, 91, 106, 108–12,
114
relation to Peirce 37–40, 215, 218,
239–306
Schelling’s critique of 33, 35, 41, 124–5,
127–8, 134, 136, 270, 271, 281, 299,
311–3, 314, 345, 359
view of philosophy as rationalistic 35, 70–2,
81–2, 85–114, 123–4, 126, 128,
135–6, 139, 280–1, 314–5, 334, 336
view of truth 35, 77–9
on the will 161–3
see also idealism, Hegel and; Kant, and
relation to Hegel
Heine, H. 99, 111–2
Heidegger, M. 77, 79
Henrich, D. 35 n. 85, 49 n. 15, 66 n. 65, 81
n. 1, 108 n. 62, 256 n. 68
Hepburn, R. 138 n. 57
Hinske, N. 12 n. 29
Hobhouse, L. T. 159 n. 48, 163–4
holism 59–66, 140–1, 151–2, 158, 159–65,
172, 213, 227, 261, 272, 291–2, 308,
314, 316–8, 320, 321–2, 324, 331, 333
Hookway, C. 236 n. 76, 244 n. 22, 250 n. 51,
267–8, 277 n. 37, 289 n. 84
Horstmann, R-P. 65 n. 62, 66 n. 65
H
¨
osle, V. 66 n. 65
Houlgate, S. 6 n. 15, 19 n. 46, 50, 91 n. 23,
215–8, 225, 229, 233, 235
Hume, D. 2, 23–4, 27, 36, 67, 141, 168, 213
n. 12, 220, 329, 347 n. 2
Hylton, P. 118
Hyppolite, J. 18 n. 45
idealism
absolute 55 n. 32, 240 n. 3, 253, 254, 255
n. 65, 276
Hegel and 34, 45–76, 123, 125–6, 127,
129, 131, 134–6, 253–4, 259–62,
264, 266–7, 276, 283, 289–92, 314
Kantian 16–17, 34, 46–55, 73, 262, 292,
328–9, 331
mentalistic 54–57, 59, 259, 260–1, 268,
276, 290
objective 74, 127 n. 27, 253, 283
panlogistic 124–7, 128, 131
Schelling and 124
subjective 55, 59 n. 44, 59 n. 55, 74, 253,
260, 261 n. 85, 261 n. 86, 262–3, 266,
291–3
see also anti-realism; British Idealism;
conceptual realism; finite
Identity of Indiscernibles 14, 174, 347
Ilting,K-H. 83n.6
indexicality 244–5, 277–8 , 293, 295–7
individuals 36, 41, 62, 76, 144, 151, 153,
155–8, 160–76, 270, 277, 280, 293–4,
296–7, 308, 312, 318, 321, 323–4,
346–9, 352, 355–8, 363, 367–8
394 Index
infallibilism 180–3, 186, 192, 196–200, 204,
211
infinite 31–2, 62–66, 67, 68, 72, 259, 290,
334
inquiry 6, 11, 35, 46–7, 51–2, 57, 81, 85–6,
88, 91, 94, 95, 96–9, 102–3, 107–8,
111–12, 114, 178, 184, 186, 194, 203
n. 63, 212–15, 218–22, 224–8, 230–7,
260, 276, 290
intellectual intuition 28 n. 68, 126
Inwood, M. 84 n. 9
Jackson,M.W. 81n.2
Jacobi, F. H. 13 n. 35, 62 n. 56, 67–72, 74
n. 92, 229, 288, 330, 315
James, W. 40–1, 122, 142, 209, 227 n. 48,
318 n. 62, 327–41
Jensen, K. E. 269 n. 3, 299 n. 1, 301 n. 4
Johnson,P.O. 83n.7
Jolley, N. 15 n. 38
Jones, H. 117, 128–9
judgements 154–6, 355–6
justification, regress of 178–9, 184, 194, 196
Kant, I. 5, 37, 39, 40, 126, 217, 250, 258,
278, 283, 328–9, 331–2, 364
on relation between intuitions and
concepts 126, 258, 278, 283
and relation to Hegel 2, 5, 8–9, 12, 18,
34, 45–57, 60–1, 73–6, 119, 130,
215, 253. 262, 282–3, 292, 332,
350
andmetaphysics 2, 4 n. 9, 7–8, 10–32,
45–54, 60–1, 119–20, 350
and his Copernican revolution 21 n. 52, 27,
34, 53, 253 n. 58, 362–3
see also free thought; idealism; scepticism;
synthetic a priori;
things-in-themselves
Kaufmann, W. A. 83 n. 7, 87–8 n. 18
Kemp Smith, N. 144 n. 5, 145–6
Kierkegaard, S. 41, 125 n. 19, 275, 299,
311 n. 42, 311 n. 43, 345, 360–2 ,
366 n. 39
Kluge, E-H. W. 266 n. 101
Knowles, D. 92 n. 25, 165 n. 63
Knox, T. M. 83 n. 7, 150 n. 24
K
¨
ohnke, K. C. 124 n. 14
Kreines,J. 1n.3,25n.62
Kuklik, B. 263 n. 92
Krug, W. 311 n. 43
Langton, R. 17 n. 42
Left Hegelians 123–7, 136
Lehrer, K. 177
Leibniz, G. W. 13–15, 17, 174, 218, 329,
347, 359, 364–5
Leucippus 59, 70 n. 77, 261, 291
Lewes, G. H. 123
Lewis, C. I. 188 n. 25, 197–200
Locke, J. 2, 36, 67, 167–70, 218–19, 329,
346
Longuenesse, B. 9 n. 24, 16 n. 40
Lotze, R. H. 128, 143, 175 n. 100
Loux,M. 3n.6,3n.8,47n.7,348
Lowe, E. J. 3 n. 6, 3 n. 8, 4 n. 10, 4 n. 11, 26
n. 64, 348 n. 3, 348 n. 4
L
¨
owith, K. 294 n. 101
McCarney, J. 110 n. 71, 112
Macherey, P. 62 n. 55
Mackie, J. L. 184
McDowell, J. 283 n. 63
McTaggart, J. McT. E. 35, 118, 121, 122,
131–42, 174
Maker, W. 6 n. 15, 91 n. 23, 216 n. 15
Malabou, C. 363 n. 31
Mander, W. J. 143 n. 2, 144 n. 3, 146 n. 12,
147, 185 n. 16
Mandelbaum, M. 327 n. 4
Manser, A. 143 n. 2
Mark, T. C. 177 n. 2
Marx. K. 123, 311 n. 43
materialism 69, 123, 127, 129, 133
matter 58, 65, 66, 69, 79, 171–2, 260, 262,
291, 311 n. 41, 349, 363
Menand, L. 40 n. 100, 209 n. 3
Mersenne, M. 211
metaphysics 2–41, 45, 46–54, 56, 60–1,
67–70, 102, 247, 275–6
metaphysica generalis 13, 14, 30, 32, 40, 50;
see also ontology
metaphysica specialis 13, 30, 31, 32, 50
metaphysics of experience 7–8, 10, 14, 17,
18, 20, 21, 27
see also Kant and metaphysics;
non-metaphysical readings of Hegel
Migotti, M, 214 n. 14
Mill, J. S. 53 n. 29, 227 n. 46, 227 n. 48, 263
n. 92
Milne, A. J. M. 143 n. 1, 143 n. 2
Misak, C. 213 n. 11, 236 n. 76
Mitchell, O. H. 278
Moore, G. E. 23 n. 55, 77
monism 64–5, 118, 151, 166, 279, 283, 304,
307–9, 320, 331, 333; see also neutral
monism
Mounce, H. O. 214 n. 14
Mueller, G. E. 241 n. 6, 300 n. 4
Muirhead, J. H. 122
Murphey, M. G. 198 n. 50
Index 395
natural kinds 25, 39, 68–9, 100 n. 41, 155–6,
252–3, 356, 364–5
natural laws 24–5, 39, 68–9, 100 n. 41, 156,
244, 249–50, 252–3, 258, 270, 309–10,
356
Nettleship, R. L. 150 n. 24, 173–4
Neuhouser, F. 84 n. 8
Neurath, O. 187–8, 213, 237
neutral monism 329
Newton, I. 4
Newman, J. H. 226 n. 43
Nicholson, P. 117 n. 2, 164 n. 61
Nietzsche, F. 366 n. 39
nominalism 29, 34, 36, 38–40, 75–6, 123,
167, 170–1, 239–68, 272–3, 290, 293,
302, 347, 366
Novalis 173 n. 88
Ockham, W. 245, 246
O’Connor, D. D. 250 n. 51, 289 n. 84
Oderberg, D. 5 n. 12, 26 n. 64, 28 n. 68
Olsson, E. 36 n. 87
ontological argument 33, 125, 281, 312
ontology 3, 7, 13, 15, 17, 19–21, 29–30, 32,
49, 50, 67, 68, 120, 128, 146, 261, 272,
292, 315, 316, 324–5, 330
organic view of the state 164–5; see also social
holism; state
Owens, D. 211 n. 7, 220 n. 31
Parfit, D. 139 n. 61
Parkinson, G. 15 n. 38
particularity 40, 41, 66, 70, 106, 153–8,
161–3, 165, 171–4, 279, 293, 308,
347–8, 352, 356–8, 369
Passmore, J. 172
Pastin, M. 181 n. 10, 196 n. 44, 197 n. 45,
198 n. 49, 200 n. 53
Paton, H. 7 n. 20
Peirce, C. S. 37–40, 209–15, 225, 234–6,
239–68, 269–98, 299–326
Peperzak,A.T. 85n.11
Perry, T. B. 330 n. 14
Petrick, J. A. 239 n. 2, 240 n. 4, 269 n. 3, 299
n. 1
philosophy 85–90, 92–100, 108, 112, 113
versus non-philosophy 67–8, 72
Pinkard, T. 46 n. 5, 49 n. 15, 50 n. 19, 101
n. 44, 119, 128, 135 n. 51, 210 n. 4, 281
n. 55, 313 n. 49
Pippin, R. 8–9 n. 24, 19 n. 46, 34, 45–56,
60, 74 n. 90, 75, 228 n. 51, 281 n. 55,
283 n. 63, 313 n. 49, 317 n. 58
Plant, R. 117 n. 2
Plato 59, 96, 103 n. 50, 169–70, 261, 291,
345, 350, 363
Platonism 28, 33, 36, 121, 123, 135, 157,
264, 266, 358, 369
Plumer, G. 297 n. 111
Popper, K. 82–3
potentiality 247–8, 251–2, 256–7, 272,
325
pragmatism 37, 41–54, 209–37, 243, 327,
337–41
Prauss, G. 22 n. 54
presuppositionlessness 216–8 , 220–1,
225–37, 260
Price, H. H. 199 n. 52
Priest,S. 22n.54
Principle of Sufficient Reason 16, 140–2
Pringle-Pattison, A. see Seth, A.
properties 6, 16, 25, 36, 62, 146, 151, 152–9,
167–71, 174, 294–5, 303–4, 308, 316,
325, 346–70 see also abstract universal;
concrete universal; universal
Putnam, H. 1
Quinton, A. 122 n. 7
Quine, W. V. O. 177
radical empiricism 328–9, 331, 332, 333
Ramsey, F. P. 147 n. 14
rationalism 10, 28, 35, 41, 53, 82, 86–7, 94,
96, 98, 107, 111–14, 123–4, 126, 128,
135–6, 139–140, 280, 314–15, 327–8,
334, 336–7, 340, 359
realism 75–6, 239, 243, 246–9, 251, 253–5,
259, 263–7, 272, 273, 276, 289–93; see
also conceptual realism; scholastic
realism
reason 9, 12, 18, 30–2, 48, 70, 72, 81–7, 88,
91, 96–107, 110–13, 120, 123–5, 133,
135–6, 218, 219, 235, 241 n. 6, 275,
281, 285, 289, 312–13, 334, 336, 338;
see also rationalism
reconciliation [Vers¨ohnung] 100, 112–13
Redding, P. 29 n. 71, 281 n. 55, 313 n. 49
regress of justification see justification, regress
of
Reid, T. 211
Rescher, N. 177 n. 3, 184 n. 14, 185 n. 16,
186 n. 20, 195 n. 42, 214 n. 14
Right Hegelians 122–3, 142
Ritchie, D. G. 129, 135, 138 n. 56, 259 n. 78
Robbins, P. 117 n. 1
Rorty, R. 37 n. 88, 190 n. 31, 209, 214, 215,
228 n. 52
Roscelin, J. 266 n. 101
Rosenkranz, K. 127
Rosen, M. 28 n. 67, 76 n. 98, 119, 121, 135
Rosen, S. 66 n. 65
Rowe, W. 138 n. 57
396 Index
Royce, J. 105–6 n. 58, 149–50, 152, 158,
244, 245, 246, 248, 254, 259 n. 78,
276–8, 289 n. 82, 290 n. 87, 297
Ruben, D-H. 139 n. 59
Rubinoff, L. 143 n. 2
Russell, B. 15 n. 38, 26 n. 65, 77, 82 n. 4,
118–20, 141–2
Sabine, G. H. 166
scepticism 8, 18–19, 22, 34, 37, 47, 48, 51,
52, 56–7, 72 n. 83, 139–40, 168, 179,
182, 191, 193–5, 211–14, 219–220,
222–5, 233–4, 253
Schelling, F. W. J. 28 n. 68, 32 n. 76, 33
n. 79, 33 n. 81, 35, 41, 66 n. 65, 124–5,
127–8, 134, 136, 270, 271, 280–1, 299,
307, 311, 314, 345, 359
Schlick, O. 187–8, 201–3
scholastic realism 245, 247, 263 n. 91
Schulze, G. 23 n. 56
Schulz,W. 23n.56
Secondness 40–1,241–5, 248–50, 254–5,
267, 269–98, 299, 301–2, 304–5, 306,
307, 309, 323, 324, 326
Sedgwick,S. 46n.5,48n.13
Sellars, W. 177, 190–1
sense-certainty [sinnliche Gewißheit] 75 n. 93,
147–9, 243, 245, 280, 294–6, 304 n. 17,
317–8, 319, 322, 323, 325, 352–3,
360–2
Seth, A. 35, 127–31, 133 n. 47, 134–5, 136
n. 53, 138 n. 56
Shapiro, G. 269 n. 3, 299 n. 1, 306 n. 25, 323
n. 76
Siep, L. 19 n. 46, 46 n. 5, 50 n. 19
Sigwart, C. W. 175 n. 100
Singer, P. 55 n. 32, 56 n. 36
Skorupski, J. 226–8, 339 n. 37
Smith, S. B. 83 n. 7
social holism 65 n. 63, 66, 159–65; see also
state
Soll, I. 148 n. 21, 297 n. 111
Solomon, R. C. 55 n. 32
Sosa, E. 178 n. 4
Spinoza, B. 13 n. 35, 32 n. 77, 62, 64 n. 61,
118, 139 n. 60, 177, 243 n. 17, 256, 279,
307, 316
Sprigge, T. L. S. 143 n. 2, 150 n. 24, 151
n. 25, 185 n. 16
state 65 n. 63, 66, 78, 82–4, 91, 93, 94, 95,
97–8, 104, 106, 107, 110, 111, 113, 151,
157–8 n. 46, 159–65
Stern, R.
‘Going Beyond the Kantian Philosophy: On
McDowell’s Hegelian Critique of
Kant’ 22 n. 54
Hegel and the ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’ 6
n. 16, 57 n. 38, 86 n. 14, 153 n. 32,
162 n. 57, 230 n. 58
Hegel, Kant, and the Structure of the Object 3
n. 6, 30 n. 71, 75 n. 97, 76 n. 98, 267
n. 103, 329 n. 9, 332 n. 21, 336 n. 32
‘Metaphysical Dogmatism, Humean
Scepticism, Kantian Criticism’ 11
n. 57
‘Transcendental Arguments: A Plea for
Modesty’ 20 n. 47
Stirling, J. H. 123, 127–8, 259 n. 78
Stone, A. 287 n. 79
Stout, G. F. 187
Strawson, P. F. 14 n. 36, 19–20 n. 47, 47
n. 7
sublation [Aufhebung] 63, 279, 281, 306–7
substratum 157, 171, 172, 174, 329, 346–7,
348–9, 354, 357, 358
synthetic a priori knowledge 8, 17–24, 26, 53
Thales 58, 59, 64–5, 66, 68, 69, 70, 76, 260,
261, 291
Theunissen, M. 66 n. 65
things-in-themselves 2, 8, 15 n. 37, 18, 19, 20,
22, 47, 55, 56, 262, 292
Thirdness 40, 239–68, 271–3, 276, 277,
283, 286, 293, 297, 299–305, 307, 309,
323–4, 326
Th
¨
ole, B. 24 n. 61
thought
abstract nature of 36, 144, 166–75, 314–5,
363–4
categories of 5, 6, 223, 241, 247, 248, 270,
300–301, 333
necessary structure of 6–8, 18–20,46–7
presuppositionless inquiry into 229–34
and relation to experience 73–5, 132–3,
172, 248, 252–3, 257–8, 275, 278–9,
283–4, 287–8, 319, 330–1, 339, 352,
360–1
relation between thought and reality 9–10,
26–7, 33, 39–40, 41, 47, 48, 49, 51,
56, 69–70, 73–6, 78, 123–38, 221
n. 33, 247, 248–50, 253–4, 258–68,
273, 280, 283–4, 289–93, 311–12,
336, 339, 352, 363–4
see also being, deduction from thought; free
thought; idealism, Hegel and
Townsend, H. G. 299 n. 1
Trendlenburg, F. A. 124, 127 n. 27, 128,
134
trope theory 157, 347, 348–9, 357
truth 34–5, 36, 70, 73, 77–9, 104
coherence as criterion of 177–9, 183–305
identity theory of 77–9
Index 397
propositional 77–8
material 77–8
understanding 7, 9, 19, 48, 70, 72, 125, 126,
130, 133, 168–9, 241 n. 6, 282–3, 300
n. 4, 322, 327–41, 369
universals 25–6, 28, 34, 58, 69, 76, 123,
153–7, 169, 245, 257, 270, 277, 294–7,
315, 325, 347–9, 353–4, 362, 366; see
also abstract universal; Concept; concrete
universal
Van Cleve, J. 24 n. 60
Van Fraassen, B. 29 n. 70
Vera, A. 259 n. 78
Vincent, A. 117 n. 2, 129 n. 37
Vleeschauwer, H. de 15–16 n. 39
Walker, R. C. S. 24 n. 61, 177 n. 2
Walsh, W. H. 23, 55 n. 32
Wartenberg, T. 59 n. 45, 119 n. 5, 261 n. 86,
292 n. 92
Wempe, B. 172 n. 83
Westphal, K. R. 25 n. 62, 46 n. 5, 59 n. 45,
210 n. 4, 223 n. 39, 261 n. 86, 291
n. 92
White, A. 119, 124 n. 15, 135 n. 51, 136, 281
n. 55, 313 n. 49, 314 n. 51
Wiggins, D. 26 n. 64
Williams, M. 192 n. 34, 194 n. 37
Williamson, T, 3 n. 8
Winfield, R. D. 6 n. 15, 91 n. 23, 216 n. 15
Wittgenstein, L. 235 n. 74
Wolff, C. 13 n. 34, 13 n. 35
Wollheim, R. 143 n. 2
Wood, A. 108 n. 62, 108 n. 63