
[15:33 13/3/03 n:/3991 RUSSELL.751/3991-004.3d] Ref: 3991 Whisky Chapter 4 Page: 145 114-151
numbers in the final prod uct. Fortunately such contaminants can grow only
in the first few hours of the distillery fermentation (Campbell, 1996b), but
some, especially Pichia spp., produce in that time sufficiently high levels of
esters to affect the congener profile of the wash and, more probably in malt
distilleries, of the spirit. Fermentative yeast contaminants are more likely to
be associated with brewery yeast. Although they can be a serious problem in
breweries, with their similar metabolism to S. cerevisiae they are unlikely to
cause flavour problems in a distillery. The bacteria producing acetic and
lactic acids may be present on malt, and Geddes (1985) reported introduction
of both into the fermentation from that source. Since acetic bacteria are strict
aerobes they are less of a problem than the lactic bacteria, especially lacto-
bacillus, which can grow throughout the fermentation. Although written
primarily for brewery microbiologists, the review by Priest (1996) also
includes distillery lactobacilli. Enterobacteria are unlikely contaminants, but
may be introduced if contaminated water is used for rinsing sterilized equip-
ment. However, that group also includes Obesumbacterium, which is a pos-
sible contaminant of brewery yeast. Fortunately these bacteria are quickly
inactivated by the falling pH and increasing alcohol content during fermen-
tation. They are a more serious problem in breweries, since they increase
over successive fermentations with re-use of contaminated yeast, but that is
irrelevant to Scotch whisky distilleries: yeast is never re-pitched to a follow -
ing fermentation. The Gram-negative bacteria that disappeared within ten
hours of pitching the fermentations studied by Dolan (1976) could well
have been either acetic bacteria or enterobacteria.
Manufacturers of distillery yeast do not guarantee a pure culture (R. C.
Jones, 1998), but in practice the likely level of contamination is low. Brewery
yeast, on the other hand, is a potential source of both fermentative yeasts and
bacteria that are able to grow sufficiently during distillery fermentations to
produce detectable amounts of flavour congeners. If obtained from an unreli-
able source, brewery yeast could be contaminated by lactobacilli, pediococci
and Zymomonas, all of which produce congeners that distil with the spirit
fraction and compete with the culture yeast for fermentable sugars to reduce
the spirit yield (Dolan, 1976, 1979). Inhibition of yeast growth by some strain s
of acetic and lactic bacteria (Thomas et al., 2001) is also a possibility, although
in practice the developing anaerobic conditions and excess of culture yeast
suppress the antibiotic effect of acetic bacteria. In an interesting incidental
observation Barbour and Pr iest (1988) noted that different strains of lactobacilli
varied in their effects: even if the amount of their growth was approximately
equal, some strains caused a substantial loss of spirit yield while in other
contaminated fermentations different strains had no such effect.
Ineffective sterilization of washbacks and associated equipment, or contami-
nated rinse water, are other possible sources of contamination, but are largely
avoidable with correct procedures. Stainless steel washbacks cleaned after
each fermentation and sterilized either by steam or by the final stage of a
CIP system are less likely to be a source of contamination than wooden wash-
backs, which are almost impossible to sterilize (Dolan, 1976). However, even
though some microbial contaminants in the cracks will survive any practical
Chapter 4 Yeast and fermentation 145