
SOMEONE TO WATCH OVER ME
US 1987 r/t 105 min col. Production Company: Columbia
Pictures Corporation. Executive Producer: Ridley Scott. Pro-
ducers: Thierry de Ganay and Harold Schneider. Director:
Ridley Scott. Writers: Howard Franklin, Danilo Bach, and
David Seltzer. Director of Photography: Steven Poster. Produc-
tion Designer: Jim Bissell. Music: Michael Kamen. Cast: To m
Berenger (Mike Keegan), Jerry Orbach (Lt. Garber), Lorraine
Bracco (Ellie Keegan), Mimi Rogers (Claire Gregory), John
Rubinstein (Neil Steinhart), Andreas Katsulas (Joey Venza).
Someone to Watch Over Me is perhaps one of Scott’s
most audience-friendly films, the product of a period in the
director’s career when he was somewhat wary of creating
radical, experimental work following the commercial fail-
ure of BLADE RUNNER and LEGEND. The film’s basic sto-
ryline was pitched to him by screenwriter HOWARD
FRANKLIN. At the time Scott has been trying to develop a
project tentatively called “Johnny Utah” (eventually renamed
Point Blank and directed by Kathryn Bigelow in 1991). How-
ever the idea foundered and Scott told PAUL M. SAMMON
that he took on Someone instead in the belief that the film’s
basic story of two people “thrown together into a high-pres-
sure situation” sounded attractive. Scott appreciated “the
contrast and coming together of the two main characters’
different social classes.”
Filming took place over eleven weeks in Manhattan,
Queens, and Los Angeles, where different areas stood in for
New York locations. One scene was filmed in Los Angeles’
Mayan Theater, while the initial murder scene was shot
inside a swimming-pool in the old Queen Mary, the luxury
liner now permanently in dry-dock in Long Beach, Califor-
nia. Scott told Sammon that the experience of the film as “an
absolute walk in the park, because the scale of my three pre-
vious movies had been so huge. This was a more intimate
drama ...I also felt comfortable filming in New York.”
Reviews were modest to say the least: Var iety believed
that the central love story posed “a hurdle for the audience
to believe,” while the “highly contrived climax” was “incred-
ible and unconvincing.” Vincent Canby of the New York
Times criticized Scott for his “dependence on a few, compar-
atively easy-to-achieve effects that pass for style ...all sup-
plemented by a music track that contrasts cocktail-piano
pop and high-toned classical tidbits.” Pauline Kael summed
up her experience of the film thus: she wondered why “such
morbid finicky care” had been lavished over “this silly little
story,” as the director had done nothing more than “worried
the fun out of it.” By contrast Richard Corliss of Time appre-
ciated Scott’s glamorous realization of “Manhattan in the
’40s, with its twin thrills of grandeur and menace. The side-
walks gleam like a Bakelite floor. A hired gun jogs into a
Fifth Avenue foyer.” British reviewers enjoyed the film: Iain
Johnstone of the Sunday Times recognized Scott’s ability “to
make his characters not just figures in, but tangible con-
stituents of their own landscape”; Simon Cunliffe of the New
Statesman saw the film as a criticism of yuppie culture; while
Scarth Flett of the Sunday Express (with a concern for sibi-
lants) called it “a stark, stylish thriller.”
Someone was released in September 1987 with virtually
no publicity (the victim of an administrative regime at
Columbia Pictures which failed to support the film). The
film disappeared rapidly from the few theaters in which it
had been booked, grossing only $10 million from its Amer-
ican release. Scott himself enjoyed the experience of the film,
but its box-office failure made him philosophical. He
recalled to Sammon: “I thought, ‘There goes another one. I
did it right, but it didn’t really go. Oh, well, time to move on
to the next one.’”
Nonetheless the film contains distinct echoes of Scott’s
earlier work, not least in its representation of NEW YORK
as a living presence. The opening sequence begins with a
spectacular aerial shot of the dusky Manhattan skyline
(recalling the city in Blade Runner), focusing on the Chrysler
Building before sweeping across the Hudson River and com-
ing to rest on the more mundane apartment block where
Mike (TOM BERENGER) and Ellie Keegan (LORRAINE
BRACCO) reside. Scott told Sammon that the Chrysler
Building was “real fantasy architecture, and one of the most
beautiful buildings of its era . . . A spectacular achievement.”
However, this romanticized view is abruptly superseded by
images of the city as a threatening presence: the pavements
thronged with pedestrians staring into the distance; the inte-
rior of Win Hockings’s (Mark Moses’s) ultra-chic night-
spot, where individual faces can only be briefly glimpsed in
the flashing strobe lights; and the ever-present smoke ema-
nating from the sewers, forming a background to most exte-
rior sequences. Franklin’s script describes New York City as
“the ultimate object of man’s [sic] desire and fulfillment.”
However this proves nothing but an illusion; like the
futuristic city in Blade Runner, New York is a DYSTOPIA
where no one looks after each other, where people are end-
lessly on the move with no specific objective in mind. The
smoke not only reminds us how polluted the city is, but
assumes a symbolic function, a reminder of how seldom the
characters express their feelings for one another. They would
rather put a smokescreen in front of themselves. The script
makes this clear in some of the exchanges between Claire
Gregory (MIMI ROGERS) and Mike. When Mike tells her
that Ellie knows about their love affair, Claire absorbs it the
information without making any emotional response. She
decides that the most suitable course of action would be to
leave town; however, her body language demonstrate a reluc-
tance to express herself honestly.
At the end of the film Mike and Ellie are reunited after
a shoot-out in which Venza (ANDREAS KATSULAS) dies
288
■
SOMEONE TO WATCH OVER ME