
down a job or sustain a relationship for any length of time.
This is emphasized in a sequence where she auditions as an
MTV “VJ.” The (unseen) executive asks her to read the
autocue,“look into the camera, and give it that, that person-
ality.” Although stunningly attired, Maggie cannot show her
real personality on account of her dyslexia. Needless to say,
the company decides not to hire her. Other characters expe-
rience similar image problems: Mrs. Lefkewitz (Francine
Beers), a guest at the retirement home where Ella lives, who
returns in depression from a visit to the local shopping mall:
“[It] is for young people, people with teeth . . .You know
what I saw today? ...Pants with ‘Juicy’ written across the
heinie. I’m gonna wear that?”
Hanson suggests that the only way to overcome such
inhibitions is to be true to oneself—in metaphorical terms,
to wear one’s own clothing (including shoes) and be com-
fortable with it. As the action unfolds, Maggie’s self-esteem
gradually increases as she learns to care for others, who
respond by caring for her. This is achieved in several ways:
by reading poetry out loud to the retired professor (Norman
Lloyd); or by advising Mrs. Lefkewitz on the right kind of
clothing to wear for her son’s wedding. Maggie herself cares
little for her appearance—as shown when she walks towards
the camera in a supermarket wearing overalls and sneakers.
Rose’s transformation is signaled as she walks confidently
up the aisle, accompanied by her father Michael (Ken
Howard), wearing a pair of expensive shoes (lent to her for
the occasion by Ella). All the old inhibitions have evapo-
rated; she now possesses the courage to wear what she
pleases in public. Hanson suggests this by means of a close-
up that begins at her feet and then tracks upwards to her silk
wedding dress and her bouquet of flowers, and ends with a
medium close-up of her smiling face. This is followed by a
point-of-view shot of Maggie, Ella and Simon all looking at
her admiringly as she walks towards them.
In Her Shoes is also about overcoming loneliness, both
mental and physical. Both Rose and Maggie are prisoners of
their respective existences: Rose devotes all her energies to
her job as a lawyer (to avoid thinking about herself), while
Maggie picks up men and gets drunk most nights. Even
when they get together, they fail to connect with one
another. This is emphasized in a scene at a late-night diner,
which begins with the two of them held in a two-shot as
they laugh and joke with each other. When Rose asks the
server “Are you hiring?” the mood abruptly changes, as her
sister objects to the idea of working “the graveyard shift serv-
ing pancakes to cops and whores and drunks.” When Rose
insists that “there’s a whole world of commerce out there
that has nothing to do with sex,” Maggie flounces out in a
huff. The latter part of this sequence comprises a series of
close-ups of each sister at the edge of the frame, flanked by
empty seats, emphasizing their alienation from one another.
Following the example of designer TOM FODEN in
MATCHSTICK MEN, Hanson reinforces this theme by
means of the paintings of John Register, which hang on the
walls of Rose’s and Ella’s houses. In a documentary accom-
panying the DVD release of In Her Shoes, Hansen justified
his design concept by explaining how Register’s work elim-
inates people together, creating images that draw attention
to the void as well as emphasizing the twin themes of lone-
liness and alienation.
All three protagonists—Rose, Maggie, and Ella—suffer in
this way because they cannot reconcile themselves to the loss
of Caroline—Ella’s daughter and the sisters’ mother. They pre-
tend that it never happened at all. However, when Ella shows
the sisters a photograph album full of fading images, the truth
gradually emerges: Caroline was a wonderful mother to her
children, but experienced mental health problems. Ella wanted
to keep her daughter on medication, and judged that her rela-
tionship with her husband Michael was “far too passionate for
her to handle.” Michael wanted to put Caroline away on the
grounds that she was “unfit” to look after children. With no
means to resist either of them, Caroline had committed sui-
cide by driving her car into a tree. Hanson stages one of these
revelatory scenes—involving the two sisters—in front of a
bathroom mirror. As they speak, both Rose and Maggie look
into it, suggesting that they are at last coming to terms with
themselves and their shared CHILDHOOD.
In Her Shoes follows earlier Scott work—as director and
producer—by focusing on the idea of parenthood. As in
MONKEY TROUBLE, several characters prove bad parents:
Ella appears “bossy, self-righteous, [and] nosy about things
that weren’t her business”; Michael wants Caroline to be
hospitalized and later decided to cut Ella out of his family’s
life in the belief that they “were better off without her;” while
his second wife Sydelle (Candice Azzara) dotes on her
daughter Marcia (Jackie Geary), but pays scant attention to
her stepdaughters. Even when she does stage an engagement
party, Sydelle humiliates Rose by criticizing her love of
books, her inability to sustain a romance, and her fondness
for food. Thus it is not surprising that Rose should ask:
“Why is she giving me this party? She hates me. Someone
else should do it, somebody who l-loves me, someone who
looks at me and say[s] ‘all of this is nothing more than the
happiness you deserve.’” The only person who unreservedly
loved her children was Caroline. Maggie remembers that
“she was special, different from other moms. She used to
surprise us. One time I opened up my lunch box and there
was a tiara inside.” On another day she dressed her children
in their best party dresses and took them to Lord and Tay-
lor, the specialist department store in NEW YORK, in a vain
attempt to sell fudge to them. The fudge ended up being
spilt over the jewelry counter, but Rose recalls that “oh, God,
she [Caroline] was beautiful” as she promised to buy pres-
176
■
IN HER SHOES