392
Marketing Dynamics: Theory and Practice
and refinement of the message and materials. In situations, where time and cost are important
considerations, focus groups may be the most efficient method of data collection. Among their many
uses are: generating ideas about services or products, and pre-testing product positioning, message
concepts or pre finished communication materials.
A focus group generally consists of eight to ten unacquainted participants, who are fairly similar
to each other in terms of sex, age, ethnic background, risk factors and other relevant characteristics
related to the target audience. A trained moderator, who poses open-ended questions from a discussion
outline and tries to involve everyone in the discussion, leads the group. This occurs in a comfortable,
non-threatening environment where participants are encouraged to speak what’s on their minds,
especially if it is different than what other people are saying. The discussion is usually recorded on
audio or video tape, and lasts one to two hours. Although focus groups are an excellent technique for
obtaining qualitative information from several respondents at once, there are some disadvantages to
the method. First, people may be reticent to discuss sensitive subjects, such as sexual behaviour, in
front of a group. For certain topics, it may be more appropriate to conduct individual in-depth interviews,
which use the qualitative probing questions of focus groups, but afford more privacy to the respondent.
Another disadvantage is that focus group results are not directly to be projected back to the target
population. However, after hearing the same thing from a number of participants, it is likely that their
views are common to many in the target audience. The qualitative nature of the research and small
sample sizes preclude the use of focus group results as baseline data for program evaluation.
Baseline KAP Study
Based upon the information unearthed by the secondary research review and/or focus groups, it
should be possible to narrow down the scope of the problem. Prior to the implementation of a
program, data are needed regarding audience awareness, knowledge, attitudes and behaviours related
to the program issue. In order to guide the development of the marketing strategy and to provide a
baseline from which to determine whether the program accomplishes its goals, a KAP (knowledge,
attitudes and practices) study should be conducted. Using the preliminary research, the survey is
drafted and pre-tested in order to evaluate its validity, reliability and to identify any other problems
with its design. As with any survey, the interviewers must be trained, interviews must be conducted
and data must be entered and analyzed. This can be an expensive and time-consuming task. However,
this type of survey can be very useful for identifying and understanding the audience better in terms
of their demographics, psychographics and individual behaviours. Depending upon the validity of the
technique used, the survey can help estimate how many in the population are “users” of the product
(e.g., how many practice safer sex), identify their attitudes toward the product and learn other
quantitative information on the attributes of users and non-users.
Many other important facts can be determined from the results of the KAP study. A crucial issue
is the consumer’s readiness to adopt the product. Within the population, there are many segments of
people who have different levels of awareness, knowledge or adoption of the behavior. In Prochaska’s
“Stages of Change” model, consumers are thought to move along a “readiness continuum,” consisting
of different stages—from being unaware to aware, to knowledgeable, interested, motivated, ready-
to-try, users, and then possibly non-users. The strategy that will be used for the program depends
upon the point on the continuum at which the majority of the target audience is located. For example,
gay males in San Francisco who may need help in maintaining their safer sex behavior would merit