Innovative Marketing Strategies
369
Relationship between EVA and Market
Value Added is more complicated than the
one between EVA and Firm Value. The
market value of a firm reflects not only the
Expected EVA of Assets in Place but also
the Expected EVA from Future Projects, To
the extent that the actual economic value
added is smaller than the expected EVA the
market value can decrease even though the
EVA is higher. This does not imply that
increasing EVA is bad from a corporate
finance standpoint. In fact, given a choice
between delivering a “below-expectation”
EVA and no EVA at all, the firm should deliver
the “below-expectation” EVA. It does suggest
that the correlation between increasing year-
to-year EVA and market value will be weaker
for firms with high anticipated growth (and
excess returns) than for firms with low or no
anticipated growth. It does suggest also that
“investment strategies” based upon EVA have
to be carefully constructed, especially for firms
where there is an expectation built into prices
of “high” surplus returns.
When focusing on year-to-year EVA changes
have least side effects:
1. Most or all of the assets of the firm
are already in place; i.e., very little
or none of the value of the firm is
expected to come from future
growth. [This minimizes the risk
that increases in current EVA come
at the expense of future EVA]
2. The leverage is stable and the cost
of capital cannot be altered easily
by the investment decisions made
by the firm. [This minimizes the
risk that the higher EVA is
accompanied by an increase in the
cost of capital]
Strategy Focus 10.1: Packaged Food:
Changing Consumer Needs in India
The consumer preferences are shifting from traditional
home-made delicacy to the packaged foods in India.
Although Indian consumers are becoming more
sensitive with regard to the food they purchase,
convenience packaged food products are affordable
only to certain consumer groups. Indian consumers
are price-sensitive for the packaged food products
especially as the average Indian household does not
consider most packaged food essential. Middle and
upper-middle income segments are thus the major
targets for value-added food products, such as ready
to serve, semi-cooked and frozen foods. The majority
of households still prefer fresh foodstuffs, which are
readily available at affordable prices. Freshly prepared
food is also overwhelmingly preferred, and achieves
high sales through the huge number of eating
establishments. The unorganized segment, in the form
of cottage industries producing mostly unbranded and
often unpackaged food products, also remains
important in the Indian landscape. Euro-monitor
projects current value growth of just over 8% for the
packaged foods market in 2003. Similar to the preceding
year, a combination of price discounts and small
packaging sizes is expected to allow leading packaged
food manufacturers in India to increase product
penetration into rural areas, as well as entice repeated
purchases.
Despite the various catch-up strategies deployed by
Hindustan Lever and other regional players within
confectionery, ice cream, dairy and oils and fats, the
Gujarat Co-op. Milk Marketing Federation Ltd.
(GCMMF) further extends its market during 2001-
2003 with frequent product launches and re-launches.
Its brand presence especially at the mass level, an
excellent distribution network spanning all urban areas,
and continued expansion into rural areas added values
to the customers preferences. More importantly, while
Britannia Industries enjoyed good realization within
bakery products, Hindustan Lever suffered from the
continued poor performance of its ice cream
operations. The retailing scene in India is evolving,
and the emergence of these modern retail stores is
gradually shaping changes in the shopping habits of
the Indian population. The outlook for packaged food
in India will, however, be pale in comparison with
countries on a similar path of economic progress, such
as China, Indonesia and Vietnam.