H. Crystallographic Data Sets 371
Atom WP PS x y
Occ.
Bi b 8(e) 1 0.9829 0.2681
Sr c 8(e) 1 0.9604 0.7530
3
Cu 4(d) 2.. 0.4640
O(1) 8(e) 1 0.9153 0.6643
O(2) 8(e) 1 0.4662 0.7667
0(3) 8(e) 1 0.7071 0.9998
0.06311
0.1772
1
4
0.0716
0.1454
0.2523
0.92
a
Cation content Bi1.78Pbo.2oSrl.70CuO 6 from microprobe analysis.
b Bi = Bio.899Pbo.lo 1.
c Sr -- Sro.9239Bio.0684Pbo.o077.
Compound a (A) b (A) c (A) T c (K) Ref.
BiPbBaLaCuO6 5.4028 5.4745 24.515
a n.s.
Bil.924Pbo.216Srl.7ooCuO6 b 5.2757 5.3797 24.558 18
Bi1.8Pbo.2Srl.8Lao.2CuO6.36 5.396 5.374 24.374 21
....
a Space group
Fmmm.
b Cation content Bil.78Pbo.2oSr1.7oCuO6 from microprobe analysis.
References: 1, Pham
et al.
(1993); 2, Torardi
et al.
(1991); 3, Rajagopal
et al.
(1993).
Superconductivity in the T1-Ba-Cu-O system was first reported by
Kondoh
et al.
(1988) and Sheng and Hermann (1988a). T1-2201 crystallizes
with two structural modifications, one tetragonal and the other orthorhombic, and
is superconducting with T c up to 90 K for an optimal oxygen content. The first
structural refinement on tetragonal TlzBazCuO6
(I4/mmm)
was reported with the
T1 site on the 4-fold rotation axis (Torardi
et al.,
1988a). In more recent articles
the T1 site was found to be displaced [16(n) 0.0406 0 0.29696 (Liu
et al.,
1992b),
32(0) 0.039 0.017 0.29735 (Opagiste
et al.,
1993a)], and a partial substitution up
to 7 at.% T1 by Cu was detected. The presence of an extra O site (8(g) 0 1 0.267)
with an occupancy ranging from 0.005 (T c = 73 K) to 0.028 (nonsuperconduct-
ing), located between the
additional
T10 layers, was suggested by Shimakawa
et al.
(1990). Orthorhombic T1-2201 (a -- 5.4451, b = 5.4961, c-- 23.153 A,
nonsuperconducting) was first reported by Huang
et al.
(1988), who proposed
space group
Fmmm.
The crystal structure was also refined in subgroups of
Fmmm,
in order to take into account distortions in the
additional
layers
[A2aa
(Hewat
et al.,
1988);
Abma
(Parise
et al.,
1988; Str6m
et al.,
1994)]. Note that in
the latter refinements no O site between the T10 layers was considered. It is
generally agreed that the tetragonal structure is favored for Tl-deficient composi-
tions, whereas the orthorhombic structure is formed for higher T1 contents
(Shimakawa, 1993) (Fig. 8.36). To a minor extent, the transition from the
tetragonal to the orthorhombic modification also depends on the oxygen content,
a high oxygen content favoring the orthorhombic structure (Jorda
et al.,
1993;
Str6m
et al.,
1994). Stoichiometric compounds (with respect to the T1 content)
could be obtained by high-pressure synthesis for both structural modifications
(Opagiste
et al.,
1993b; Jorda
et al.,
1994).