produces ten for every twenty computers the USA
produces).This disparity may be the result of better
skills by American workers in making this product.
Therefore, the USA has an absolute advantage in
computers. But the situation is reversed for auto-
mobiles: the USA makes only ten cars for every
twenty units manufactured in Japan. In this instance,
Japan has an absolute advantage.
Based on Table 2.1, it should be apparent why
trade should take place between the two countries.
The USA has an absolute advantage for computers
but an absolute disadvantage for automobiles. For
Japan, the absolute advantage exists for automobiles
and an absolute disadvantage for computers. If each
country specializes in the product for which it has
an absolute advantage, each can use its resources
more effectively while improving consumer welfare
at the same time. Since the USA would use fewer
resources in making computers, it should produce
this product for its own consumption as well as for
export to Japan. Based on this same rationale, the
USA should import automobiles from Japan rather
than manufacture them itself. For Japan, of course,
automobiles would be exported and computers
imported.
An analogy may help demonstrate the value of
the principle of absolute advantage. A doctor is
absolutely better than a mechanic in performing
surgery, whereas the mechanic is absolutely supe-
rior in repairing cars. It would be impractical for
the doctor to practice medicine as well as repair the
car when repairs are needed. Just as impractical
would be the reverse situation, namely for the
mechanic to attempt the practice of surgery. Thus,
for practicality, each person should concentrate on
and specialize in the craft which that person has
mastered. Similarly, it would not be practical for
consumers to attempt to produce all the things
they desire to consume. One should practice what
one does well and leave the manufacture of other
commodities to people who produce them well.
Principle of comparative/relative
advantage
One problem with the principle of absolute advan-
tage is that it fails to explain whether trade will take
place if one nation has absolute advantage for all
products under consideration. Case 2 of Table 2.1
shows this situation. Note that the only difference
between Case 1 and Case 2 is that the USA in Case
2 is capable of making thirty automobiles instead of
the ten in Case 1. In the second instance, the USA
has absolute advantage for both products, resulting
in absolute disadvantage for Japan for both. The
efficiency of the USA enables it to produce more
of both products at lower cost.
At first glance, it may appear that the USA has
nothing to gain from trading with Japan. But nine-
teenth-century British economist David Ricardo,
perhaps the first economist to fully appreciate rela-
tive costs as a basis for trade, argues that absolute
production costs are irrelevant.
2
More meaningful
are relative production costs, which determine what
trade should take place and what items to export
or import. According to Ricardo’s principle of
relative (or comparative) advantage, one country
may be better than another country in producing
many products but should produce only what it pro-
duces best. Essentially, it should concentrate on
either a product with the greatest comparative
advantage or a product with the least comparative
disadvantage. Conversely, it should import either
a product for which it has the greatest compara-
tive disadvantage or one for which it has the least
comparative advantage.
Case 2 shows how the relative advantage varies
from product to product. The extent of relative
advantage may be found by determining the ratio of
1111
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20111
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
40
41
42
43
44
45111
25
TRADE THEORIES AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Table 2.1 Possible physical output
Product USA Japan
Case 1 Computer 20 10
Automobile 10 20
Case 2 Computer 20 10
Automobile 30 20
Case 3 Computer 20 10
Automobile 40 20