In his role as Reich Minister of Agriculture and Reich Peasant Leader,
Darre
´
was primarily interested in ‘peasant policy’, and he now protested in
vain at the appointment of a representative of the SS as head of the Land
Office and at the resultant gearing of future settlement in the Protectorate to
the requirements of population policy. The working-group, which Rei-
schle, the head of Darre
´
’s staff office, had already set up in 1938 to prepare for
the settlement of Bohemia and Moravia, had long been aware of the fact that
control over the Land Office would be the decisive administrative prerequi-
site for the transfer of agricultural property in the Protectorate, and had,
therefore, also sought to secure it.
176
However, the SS had beaten Darre
´
’s
people to it, for they had the impression that Darre
´
and his agrarian experts
considered the settlement issue too much in terms of ‘food policy’.
177
During the following months Darre
´
, supported by the Reich Protector’s
office, kept complaining about Gottberg’s policy and, as Pancke reported to
Himmler, trying to ‘torpedo’ it.
178
A particular problem was the fact that
the acting headship of the Land Office lacked clear administrative authority,
as ‘hitherto its legal position [has been based] exclusively on the policing
role assigned to the Reichsfu
¨
hrer-SS’.
179
Gottberg aimed at ‘promoting’ his Czech Land Office to be ‘the Reich
Protector’s supreme settlement authority’.
180
By trying to take over the
DAG (German Settlement Society), founded by Darre
´
, through an associa-
tion of which he was the chairman, Gottberg sharpened the conflict with
Darre
´
, who in response tried to have it transferred to the state.
181
Darre
´
may
well not have been entirely innocent in Gottberg’s involvement in a
dubious financial affair in connection with the purchase of the DAG. As a
result, the latter was first relieved of his post as head of the Settlement Office
in November 1939 and then, in December, also of the headship of the Land
Office.
182
The views on settlement policy of Gottberg’s successor, Theodor
Gross, who came from the Reich Protector’s office, were much closer to
those of the Ministry of Agriculture than to those of the SS.
183
Thus Himmler’s move to take over settlement policy failed initially,
above all as a result of the opposition of Darre
´
. After the latter had been
kicked out, Himmler had envisaged a comprehensive settlement policy
based on effective cooperation between the individual parts of his organiza-
tion. His contacts and responsibilities as Reichsfu
¨
hrer-SS and Chief of the
German Police had appeared to make him predestined to become commis-
sar for the resettlement of the South Tyroleans, and his control of the police
in the Protectorate, which was not constrained by any legal restrictions,
wa r pr e pa rat i o n s a n d ex pans i o n 421