POLYPHENOL OXIDASE BROWNING
Polyphenol oxidase (PPO, EC 1.10.3.1, systematic
name 1,2 benzenediol:oxygen oxidoreductase) is
also labeled as phenoloxidase, phenolase, monophe-
nol and diphenol oxidase, and tyrosinase. This en-
zyme catalyzes one of the most important color re-
actions that affects many fruits, vegetables, and
seafood, especially crustaceans. This postmortem
discoloration in crustacean species such as lobster,
shrimp, and crab is also called melanosis or black
spot. It connotes spoilage, is unacceptable to con-
sumers, and thus reduces the market value of these
products.
Polyphenol oxidase is responsible for catalyzing
two basic reactions. In the first reaction, it catalyzes
the hydroxylation of phenols with oxygen, to the
o-position adjacent to an existing hydroxyl group.
For example, tyrosine, a monohydroxy phenol, is
present naturally in crustaceans. PPOs from shrimp
and lobster are activated by trypsin or by a trypsin-
like enzyme in the tissues to hydroxylate tyrosine
with the formation of dihydroxylphenylamine
(DOPA). The second reaction is the oxidation of the
diphenol to o-benzoquinones, which are further oxi-
dized to melanins (brown to dark products), usually
by nonenzymatic mechanisms.
The major effect of reducing agents or antioxi-
dants in the prevention of browning is their ability to
reduce the o-quinones to the colorless diphenols, or
to react irreversibly with the o-quinones to form
stable colorless products. The use of reducing com-
pounds is the most effective control method for PPO
browning. The most widespread antibrowning treat-
ment used by the food industry was the addition of
sulfiting agents. However, because of safety con-
cerns, other methods have been developed, including
the use of other reducing agents (such as ascorbic
acid and analogs, cysteine and glutathione), chelat-
ing agents (phosphates, EDTA), acidulants (citric
18 Part I: Principles
presence of putrescine and cadaverine is more sig-
nificant in shellfish, such as shrimp. The detection
and quantification of histamine is fairly simple and
inexpensive. However, the detection and quantifica-
tion of putrescine and cadaverine are more compli-
cated and expensive. It is suspected that histamine
may not be the real and main cause of poisoning, as
histamine is not stable under strong acidic condi-
tions such as pH 1 in the stomach. However, the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has strict
regulations governing the amount of histamine per-
missible in canned tuna, as an index of freshness of
the raw materials, because of the simplicity of hista-
mine analysis (Gopakumar 2000).
PRODUCTION OF AMMONIA FROM UREA
Urea is hydrolyzed by urease (EC 3.5.1.5) to ammo-
nia, which is one of the components of total volatile
base (TVB). TVB nitrogen has been used as a quality
index of seafood acceptability by various agencies
(Johnson and Linsay 1986, Cadwallader 2000, Go-
pakumar 2000). A good example is shark, which
contains fairly high amounts of urea in the live fish.
Under improper handling, urea is converted to am-
monia by urease, giving shark meat an ammonia
odor that is not well accepted by consumers. To
overcome this problem, the current practice of
bleeding the shark near its tail right after harvest is
very promising.
ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE DEGRADATION
Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is present in all bio-
logical systems. Its degradation in seafood has often
been reported (Fig. 1.3) (Gill 2000, Gopakumar
2000). The degradation products, such as inosine
and hypoxanthine, have been used individually or in
combination as indices of freshness for many years.
Table 1.15. Secondary Amine Production in Seafoods
Enzyme Reaction
Histidine decarboxyalse (EC 4.1.1.22) L-Histidine → histamine CO
2
Lysine decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.18) L-Lysine → cadaverine CO
2
Ornithine decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.17) L-Ornithine → putrescine CO
2
Sources: Gopakumar 2000, IUBMB-NC website (www.iubmb.org).